Errr. Yes. Doesn't mean it's a good result dropping points at home after two defeats in a week.Extended-Phenotype wrote:You just said you can't see us winning it and predicted us losing, Retardo.No Fixed Abode wrote:Surprising you say that. I would say a draw at home to Wolves would be a bad result for you.Royal Lady wrote:I think a draw would be a good result for us against their team
Unfortunately yes. Think I moved to Cambridge that season and couldn't afford to come back and forth whilst temping.SPARTA wrote:You missed the play-off semi at home?Ian Royal wrote:Home record since '95genome wrote:You say that like we've consistently beaten them in those 19 years, I seem to remember losing a good 5 or 6 games against them from the late 90's to mid 00's
P9, W4, D2, L3
I've seen four that I can recall and we won all of them. Two of them are amongst the most memorable games I've been to. So it kinda sticks out for me.
Both Gunter and Obita are pretty quick too though. The danger is that they are caught too far forward. It's attackers driving at our central defence with speed that scares me!Dave-Royal wrote:tea peg
don't think so 4.0 reading
wovles got a young black man winger very fast
Sounds a good option to me if it can be arranged.The Cap wrote:BTW Hemenbruff Royal, given your views, I'd venture that you're also wanting the bovril laced with urine. Given their past antics.
No Fixed Abode wrote:T I can't see Reading winning.
In the circumstances? You were 1-0 at HT and in total control. Then you lost the plot for a bit. Wolves were so poor in the 1st half they were there for taking.Royal Lady wrote:Hi Kes! It was a draw and, in the circumstances, I think that was a good result for us.
Users browsing this forum: Kev Royal and 63 guests