by Hound » 08 Mar 2017 12:09
by Rudolph Hucker » 08 Mar 2017 12:20
by Royal Tezza » 08 Mar 2017 12:20
by Woodcote Royal » 08 Mar 2017 12:34
jd82wingnutgenome
Very harsh. We were okay, nowhere near utter dross. Improved much more than "a bit" in the second and domin8ed - actually a lot to do with Williams and Obita more than G-Mac I thought, who only really threatened in the last 10 minutes.
Kelly had a right shocker, though.
I'm with jd82 here. We were so poor in the first half I nearly fell asleep - all of our possession was just in front of our penalty area and Newcastle had the bulk of the chances. I've not seen Kelly play such a bad half of football and it was no surprise he didn't reappear for the second.
We were much better in the second half and at least we had spells of decent possession in newcastle's half. Blackett looks so much better as a central defender than a full back so I don't know why Stam keeps picking him over Obita.
Weird innit.. might have something to do with the fact I don't go that often so I'm not used to this torturous style of play.
Obita must be spitting every week when he sees Blackett ahead of him at lb
by genome » 08 Mar 2017 12:39
by Ian Royal » 08 Mar 2017 12:45
by jd82 » 08 Mar 2017 13:28
Woodcote Royaljd82wingnut I'm with jd82 here. We were so poor in the first half I nearly fell asleep - all of our possession was just in front of our penalty area and Newcastle had the bulk of the chances. I've not seen Kelly play such a bad half of football and it was no surprise he didn't reappear for the second.
We were much better in the second half and at least we had spells of decent possession in newcastle's half. Blackett looks so much better as a central defender than a full back so I don't know why Stam keeps picking him over Obita.
Weird innit.. might have something to do with the fact I don't go that often so I'm not used to this torturous style of play.
Obita must be spitting every week when he sees Blackett ahead of him at lb
There's nothing weird about it all. You are living proof that this club has always been handicapped by more than it's fair share of Grade A Twats in the fan base.
Most supporters were desperate for a top 10 finish back in the summer. Then, as the season progressed with results proving better than expected, an increasingly vociferous minority started to come to the fore by booing the team for keeping possession rather than moving forward more quickly.
Slowly but surely these idiots were silenced as the team moved into the playoff places but the cost was reduced attendances as many "know nothings" mercifully decided to stay away.
In time honoured fashion it was never hard to predict the sort of fixture that would tempt some back. Just as 40k we're happy to travel to Wembley for a meaningless cup final when we often struggled to attract 5k to Elm Park, the mighty Newcastle at the Mad Stad was clearly too big a temptation for the whinging stay always to resist and we were treated to first half boing because we were keeping the ball in our own half.
I trust last night was sufficient to keep you and others absent for the rest of the season.
by Maguire » 08 Mar 2017 14:22
genome Seeing loads of comments about the st8 of the buses/traffic/etc.
I read the warning on Twitter by the club about getting there early, so I got a bus from town that got me to the stadium for 7, without a hitch. I stayed to the final whistle and got back to the buses without rushing, waited no longer than 10 minutes and was back in town by half ten.
by mambo3 » 08 Mar 2017 15:23
BasildonElm Park Kid It's funny - I was on the bus with some Newcastle fans on the way back and they were saying that they thought the game was pretty awful and the standard of football dreadful. They were asking me if 'it's always this bad' at the mad stad. However I thought it was one of the more interesting Reading games i'd seen this season - certainly better than Wolves on Saturday.
Compared to the later Adkins/Clarke days at least we look like a solid football side that isn't going to shatter under the slightest pressure.
Have to say though that I still think that Kermorgant is the weak link. He's another Pogrebnyak. Football fans can often be blinded to the failings of their own players and anyone that thinks he's good enough for a promotion chasing team is mistaken. Until we get in a £10m striker I can't see us being competitive in the big games.
Call me crazy but I would actually argue Kermie has been one of our best, most consistent players all season. Sure he could have got a few more goals, but he puts in a shift week in week out, I rarely come away from a game thinking that he hasn't played well.
by genome » 08 Mar 2017 15:36
mambo3 Best Defender you mean. No point putting a shift if he isn't scoring that's what he's paid to do.
by Basildon » 08 Mar 2017 15:43
mambo3BasildonElm Park Kid It's funny - I was on the bus with some Newcastle fans on the way back and they were saying that they thought the game was pretty awful and the standard of football dreadful. They were asking me if 'it's always this bad' at the mad stad. However I thought it was one of the more interesting Reading games i'd seen this season - certainly better than Wolves on Saturday.
Compared to the later Adkins/Clarke days at least we look like a solid football side that isn't going to shatter under the slightest pressure.
Have to say though that I still think that Kermorgant is the weak link. He's another Pogrebnyak. Football fans can often be blinded to the failings of their own players and anyone that thinks he's good enough for a promotion chasing team is mistaken. Until we get in a £10m striker I can't see us being competitive in the big games.
Call me crazy but I would actually argue Kermie has been one of our best, most consistent players all season. Sure he could have got a few more goals, but he puts in a shift week in week out, I rarely come away from a game thinking that he hasn't played well.
Best Defender you mean. No point putting a shift if he isn't scoring that's what he's paid to do.
by mambo3 » 08 Mar 2017 15:44
genomemambo3 Best Defender you mean. No point putting a shift if he isn't scoring that's what he's paid to do.
12 goals in 40 (9) league appearances for us, not bad for a 35 year old in the second tier.
by genome » 08 Mar 2017 15:47
mambo3genomemambo3 Best Defender you mean. No point putting a shift if he isn't scoring that's what he's paid to do.
12 goals in 40 (9) league appearances for us, not bad for a 35 year old in the second tier.
How many from set pieces?
by mambo3 » 08 Mar 2017 16:04
genomemambo3genome
12 goals in 40 (9) league appearances for us, not bad for a 35 year old in the second tier.
How many from set pieces?
Oh, sorry m8. I forgot they didn't count as goals.
by Basildon » 08 Mar 2017 16:21
mambo3genomemambo3
How many from set pieces?
Oh, sorry m8. I forgot they didn't count as goals.
Just to correct you its 8 goals from 29 games 2016/17 Championship. all being equal he scored 5 in open play
by Victor Meldrew » 08 Mar 2017 17:24
by genome » 08 Mar 2017 18:16
mambo3genomemambo3
How many from set pieces?
Oh, sorry m8. I forgot they didn't count as goals.
Just to correct you its 8 goals from 29 games 2016/17 Championship. all being equal he scored 5 in open play
by Westwood52 » 08 Mar 2017 18:45
by Ian Royal » 08 Mar 2017 20:02
genomemambo3genome
12 goals in 40 (9) league appearances for us, not bad for a 35 year old in the second tier.
How many from set pieces?
Oh, sorry m8. I forgot they didn't count as goals.
by Muskrat » 08 Mar 2017 21:40
Users browsing this forum: Fluff, WestYorksRoyal and 328 guests