It's pretty obvious that McCleary was unfit and carrying an injury for much of the latter stages of the season Stam changed up our shape to deal with the selection problems he had. And clearly it worked seeing as we had a strong end to the season. And he stuck with those changes in the final game. It wasn't the shape that failed us, it was a complete lack of doing what we'd done right in attack in the previous games that saw us winning them.Muskrat wrote:Well you've pretty much got in one there. Our last competitive game and we had three wingers on the bench, one came on after 74 minutes and the other two not at all, so I'm correct to say that Stam chose ( not refused as you said I said) to play them. We've now aquired two more who can play on the wings, so why do we need another? Plus he doesn't even look as good as the one's we've got already, so kinda pointless really
It's a fair point but it would be nice to see any sort of speed compared to some of our slowcoach performances last season. Raw speed always carries some sort of threat no matter how inconsistent the end product is.From Despair To Where? wrote:I'd take a consistent end product over searing pace any day of the week.
Glen Little didn't have pace but is the best winger I've ever seen in a Reading shirt. A drop of the shoulder or a deft touch gave him all the space he needed.
Our problem last season wasn't pace, it was urgency coupled with an inability to change the pace of an attack. Speed of thought rather than just speed.
to be fair, the way Leeds played - i.e. just hoof it up to Wood and hope for the best - wasn't especially conducive to good wing playSutekh wrote:Not sure whats happening on this one. As of this morning there's a rumour on vital football that Reading have cooled interest yet HITC and Planet Swans report last night that Reading are expecting to complete the signing. HITC also running Leeds fan's twitter comments about how they think Reading can't actually have seen him play....
But tbf that team he was in specialised in breaking very quickly and relentlessly, so we had a fair amount of pace all through the team.From Despair To Where? wrote:I'd take a consistent end product over searing pace any day of the week.
Glen Little didn't have pace but is the best winger I've ever seen in a Reading shirt. A drop of the shoulder or a deft touch gave him all the space he needed.
Our problem last season wasn't pace, it was urgency coupled with an inability to change the pace of an attack. Speed of thought rather than just speed.
This is where Harper was so under appreciated. He moved the ball through midfield and into dangerous places so effortlessly and with the minimum touches.leon wrote:But tbf that team he was in specialised in breaking very quickly and relentlessly, so we had a fair amount of pace all through the team.From Despair To Where? wrote:I'd take a consistent end product over searing pace any day of the week.
Glen Little didn't have pace but is the best winger I've ever seen in a Reading shirt. A drop of the shoulder or a deft touch gave him all the space he needed.
Our problem last season wasn't pace, it was urgency coupled with an inability to change the pace of an attack. Speed of thought rather than just speed.
Amen to that brotherSnowflake Royal wrote:This is where Harper was so under appreciated. He moved the ball through midfield and into dangerous places so effortlessly and with the minimum touches.leon wrote:But tbf that team he was in specialised in breaking very quickly and relentlessly, so we had a fair amount of pace all through the team.From Despair To Where? wrote:I'd take a consistent end product over searing pace any day of the week.
Glen Little didn't have pace but is the best winger I've ever seen in a Reading shirt. A drop of the shoulder or a deft touch gave him all the space he needed.
Our problem last season wasn't pace, it was urgency coupled with an inability to change the pace of an attack. Speed of thought rather than just speed.
Just simple balls out wide to Murty, Shorey, Little and Convey where the opposition were weak and we could do damage.
There was no control, touch, look, roll it forward, touch, touch, dither, pass back, lump it. he just played it early where it needed to go for the best route forward eventually.
The players really need to be thinking two to three passes ahead like Chess. I'm passing to you so you have these options to move us forward. We didn't think ahead enough last year.
Add in Sidwell's end to end dynamism and that was some midfield.bcubed wrote:Amen to that brotherSnowflake Royal wrote:This is where Harper was so under appreciated. He moved the ball through midfield and into dangerous places so effortlessly and with the minimum touches.leon wrote:
But tbf that team he was in specialised in breaking very quickly and relentlessly, so we had a fair amount of pace all through the team.
Just simple balls out wide to Murty, Shorey, Little and Convey where the opposition were weak and we could do damage.
There was no control, touch, look, roll it forward, touch, touch, dither, pass back, lump it. he just played it early where it needed to go for the best route forward eventually.
The players really need to be thinking two to three passes ahead like Chess. I'm passing to you so you have these options to move us forward. We didn't think ahead enough last year.
Mass Saar was an athlete?Gus the teenage cow wrote:No, No, No, this guy is another Mass Sarr - an athlete but not a footballer.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Brum Royal, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Richard and 48 guests