Most of my complaints about Gunter have never been about errors, so I'm afraid it doesn't wash.Stranded wrote:Of course he has flaws - no-one is making out he is an outstanding player but he simply is not as bad as his detractors want to believe. The problem with a defender who does make mistakes, and Gunter does make them (as all defenders at this level do) is they are so much easier to remember and point out than the multitude of times where he does something well or even adequately. If a RB blocks a cross, then you don't even remember it as nothing of note has happened but when he doesn't do so or is out of position then it sticks in the memory bank esp if it leads to a chance or a goal.NewCorkSeth wrote:But the Gunter supporters are the first to ignore key points. In almost every arguement about Gunter someone will state his inability to block crosses, his poor positioning around the box and his frankly appalling man marking. Nobody on the pro Gunter side ever tries to argue against those points. And I dont blame them. The evidence overwhelming supports it.Stranded wrote:
That is fine but as part of a discussion it helps not to ignore a key point of a posters point to try and make a counter point.
Gunter is a footballer with premier league level fitness and League 1 ability. He is only consistent in his inconsistencies. 1 game he does the positioning correctly but cant pass the ball forward. The next he is crossing beautifully into the box but leaves his man free at the far post.
In short hes a wing back who has been playing in a team that rarely plays wing backs at a level too difficult for him to cope with.
The level of his errors simply haven't been as high as people think over his career here but when they happen they are highlighted because people have this view that he constantly makes errors so it reinforces and backs up this view of him as a player.
It's the reverse of a striker, he can have a couple of awful games, miss some sitters but taps one away to win a game or salvage a point and everyone forgets the free header he put wide earlier in the game. Gunter can have 5 or 6 decent, steady games where he does nothing wrong, then he fails to block a cross, a goal results and he's shit.
Zip wrote:Gunts is a decent right back at this level. He is technically good and a better passer of the ball than Yiadom, Being a defender is not just about closing players down. That is definitely his biggest weakness though. He does stay too far off his opponent and lacks Yiadom’s fierce determination.
He is a good player to bring on if we are winning a game with ten minutes to go.
Where I disagree is with the poster...was it you Seth? who thought we could sell him for two million. Not a chance. He is 30 in July and about to enter the final year of his contract. No chance we will get that much for him.
I think you should be excluded from making any comment on this player because of your vested interest.Zip wrote:Zip wrote:Gunts is a decent right back at this level. He is technically good and a better passer of the ball than Yiadom, Being a defender is not just about closing players down. That is definitely his biggest weakness though. He does stay too far off his opponent and lacks Yiadom’s fierce determination.
He is a good player to bring on if we are winning a game with ten minutes to go.
Where I disagree is with the poster...was it you Seth? who thought we could sell him for two million. Not a chance. He is 30 in July and about to enter the final year of his contract. No chance we will get that much for him.
oxf*rd off Victor you saes oxf*rdVictor Meldrew wrote:I think you should be excluded from making any comment on this player because of your vested interest.Zip wrote:Zip wrote:Gunts is a decent right back at this level. He is technically good and a better passer of the ball than Yiadom, Being a defender is not just about closing players down. That is definitely his biggest weakness though. He does stay too far off his opponent and lacks Yiadom’s fierce determination.
He is a good player to bring on if we are winning a game with ten minutes to go.
Where I disagree is with the poster...was it you Seth? who thought we could sell him for two million. Not a chance. He is 30 in July and about to enter the final year of his contract. No chance we will get that much for him.
Is that something in Welsh?Zip wrote:oxf*rd off Victor you saes oxf*rdVictor Meldrew wrote:I think you should be excluded from making any comment on this player because of your vested interest.Zip wrote:
Bleedin’ foreignersVictor Meldrew wrote:Is that something in Welsh?Zip wrote:oxf*rd off Victor you saes oxf*rdVictor Meldrew wrote:
I think you should be excluded from making any comment on this player because of your vested interest.
Twas me indeed. Hes got a good reputation still. Full back prices have been rising recently and as his supporters on here will tell you, hes a good, consistent, leading international right back. His age shouldn't affect that moderate price.Zip wrote:Zip wrote:Gunts is a decent right back at this level. He is technically good and a better passer of the ball than Yiadom, Being a defender is not just about closing players down. That is definitely his biggest weakness though. He does stay too far off his opponent and lacks Yiadom’s fierce determination.
He is a good player to bring on if we are winning a game with ten minutes to go.
Where I disagree is with the poster...was it you Seth? who thought we could sell him for two million. Not a chance. He is 30 in July and about to enter the final year of his contract. No chance we will get that much for him.
AgreedNewCorkSeth wrote:That's putting it lightly IanSnowflake Royal wrote:Yeah, ropey cross on the wrong foot. Big deal. He had his issues today, but he was fine.URZZZZ wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
what a load of nonsense
And I'm no fan by any means.![]()
And I am right there with you..
Couldn't agree more.Forbury Lion wrote:Ejaria MOTM for me, not only was he tackling and winning the ball but he seemed to be wearing Glen Little's magic boots as the ball was sticking to his feet at times when it really shouldn't have.
Rinamota and Ejaria - That's who I'd like to see the midfield built around,
AgreedSnowflake Royal wrote:This, except I'd describe him as mediocre and passive rather than pretty shit.CountryRoyal wrote:+1
I actually think Gunter has been pretty consistent during his time here. Yes occasionally he has had quite a decent game, and on occasion he has been truly uncompromisingly shocking, but by and large, more often than not, week in week out he’s just pretty shit.
Also don't think his closing down was well executed against Brentford, but it was improved in that he was actually trying it.
Exactly, this is what full backs are supposed to do and our defence has rarely been sound since the day Gunter arrived because he doesn't do the basics in stopping our box being bombarded with crosses.Victor Meldrew wrote:Gunter was o.k for these past two games for the most part but, with all that experience, the player does so little in terms of marking a player or stopping crosses which IMHO are prerequisites for full-back play and he never learns.
thisRoyalBlue wrote:Disappointing that what should have been a pretty positive thread on the Brentford game has descended into another war of words over Gunter.
There is so much criticism over his apparent failure to close players down and allow crosses to come in. I would suggest that over the past couple of seasons a lot of this is probably due to the failure of whoever is playing ahead of him on his side of the pitch failing to drop back and do their defensive duties properly. Gunter then has to decide whether to cover the player who is moving in more centrally or get drawn out wide to try to stop a cross coming in. To my mind, leaving a player unmarked in a more central position poses the more significant immediate threat.
Which is a damning indictment, tbh.Hound wrote:Of all the regular debates on HNA, the Gunter one is surely the dullest
I told myself I would never get roped back into one. I failed.Hound wrote:Of all the regular debates on HNA, the Gunter one is surely the dullest
Pah, stop talking sense and reason. You're taking all the fun out of it.RoyalBlue wrote:Disappointing that what should have been a pretty positive thread on the Brentford game has descended into another war of words over Gunter.
There is so much criticism over his apparent failure to close players down and allow crosses to come in. I would suggest that over the past couple of seasons a lot of this is probably due to the failure of whoever is playing ahead of him on his side of the pitch failing to drop back and do their defensive duties properly. Gunter then has to decide whether to cover the player who is moving in more centrally or get drawn out wide to try to stop a cross coming in. To my mind, leaving a player unmarked in a more central position poses the more significant immediate threat.
In the spirit of the niggliness of the ongoing discussion, may I just point out that in the last game, Gunter made more defensive contributions than anybody else on the pitch. Including clearing a goal-bound header.... Anybody would think he's actually a decent defender!Maneki Neko wrote:thisRoyalBlue wrote:Disappointing that what should have been a pretty positive thread on the Brentford game has descended into another war of words over Gunter.
There is so much criticism over his apparent failure to close players down and allow crosses to come in. I would suggest that over the past couple of seasons a lot of this is probably due to the failure of whoever is playing ahead of him on his side of the pitch failing to drop back and do their defensive duties properly. Gunter then has to decide whether to cover the player who is moving in more centrally or get drawn out wide to try to stop a cross coming in. To my mind, leaving a player unmarked in a more central position poses the more significant immediate threat.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 58 guests