Might find this hard to imagine because it happens so rarely but fans are allowed to disagree with a manager.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Gomes clearly didn't rate him so what was the point of having him around when an offer was on the table and he was on Gourlay Man United wages?SCIAG wrote:I really like Gomes but he's made a mistake here. Losing one of our best midfielders for such a small fee, and to a bigger club, is a joke.
If that fee lets us get someone better in (Baker being the obvious option) or lets us get two adequate first teamers, then it makes sense, but that seems unlikely, and otherwise it's one of the most baffling sales of recent years.
There have been a few comments about his attitude. Can't work out if this are veiled remarks about something I've missed. I pay zero attention to social media so if he's been sexually harassing people in Instagram then obviously I retract my comments.
If the fan's opinion is that Kelly is one of our best midfielders then that suggests the fan is wrong. He wasn't one of our best 2 last season. He may be considered one of our best currently but that's only because we've not yet signed his replacement.SCIAG wrote:Might find this hard to imagine because it happens so rarely but fans are allowed to disagree with a manager.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Gomes clearly didn't rate him so what was the point of having him around when an offer was on the table and he was on Gourlay Man United wages?SCIAG wrote:I really like Gomes but he's made a mistake here. Losing one of our best midfielders for such a small fee, and to a bigger club, is a joke.
If that fee lets us get someone better in (Baker being the obvious option) or lets us get two adequate first teamers, then it makes sense, but that seems unlikely, and otherwise it's one of the most baffling sales of recent years.
There have been a few comments about his attitude. Can't work out if this are veiled remarks about something I've missed. I pay zero attention to social media so if he's been sexually harassing people in Instagram then obviously I retract my comments.
Obviously given Gomes' opinion then we had to sell, but to paraphrase Samuel L. Jackson, given that it is a bad opinion I've elected to ignore it.
Given that we've already lost Baker and Ejaria (and Ezatolahi), our only remaining central midfielders with first team appearances are Rinomhota, Swift, Meyler, and East. Kelly is clearly better than Meyler and East, and Swift is a sub-optimal option in a two. So almost by default, Kelly was in the top two.Nameless wrote:If the fan's opinion is that Kelly is one of our best midfielders then that suggests the fan is wrong. He wasn't one of our best 2 last season. He may be considered one of our best currently but that's only because we've not yet signed his replacement.SCIAG wrote:Might find this hard to imagine because it happens so rarely but fans are allowed to disagree with a manager.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
Gomes clearly didn't rate him so what was the point of having him around when an offer was on the table and he was on Gourlay Man United wages?
Obviously given Gomes' opinion then we had to sell, but to paraphrase Samuel L. Jackson, given that it is a bad opinion I've elected to ignore it.
He commented that the squad never felt in danger of relegation the season before last. Which is worrying. And Gomes publically criticised his attitude (and performance) post Sheff U. So there's enough to speculate on.0SCIAG wrote:I really like Gomes but he's made a mistake here. Losing one of our best midfielders for such a small fee, and to a bigger club, is a joke.
If that fee lets us get someone better in (Baker being the obvious option) or lets us get two adequate first teamers, then it makes sense, but that seems unlikely, and otherwise it's one of the most baffling sales of recent years.
There have been a few comments about his attitude. Can't work out if this are veiled remarks about something I've missed. I pay zero attention to social media so if he's been sexually harassing people in Instagram then obviously I retract my comments.
Rinomhota, Kelly, Ejaria >> Rinomhota, Ejaria, Swift >>>Zip wrote:Part of the problem I had with Kelly was that alongside Swift it made us incredibly lightweight in midfield. Given that Swift still appears to be in Gomes plans there was no realistic opportunity for Kelly next season. Obvs I hope Baker returns. Failing that I hope we can bring someone else in who will be a better fit with Swift and Rinomhota than Kelly would have been. Meyler isn’t the answer. I have no idea if East can step up.SCIAG wrote:Baker is obviously a much better player than Kelly, he'll have an extended career at the highest level. Baker is much too good for us. Only midfielders we've had with that level of talent in the last ten years or so are Carrico and Gylfi. You don't need to be that good to cut it for Reading.Zip wrote:
If he is as good as you suggest then it is a very poor deal. Personally I just don’t think he is that good, When I compare the way Baker controlled games from deep in the back end of last season I just don’t believe Kelly can do that. It will be interesting to see how he does. If he succeeds let’s hope there is a decent sell on clause otherwise we have lost out one one of our home in a big way.
At the moment it isn't a choice between Kelly and Baker, it's a choice between Kelly and East or Meyler. I would argue that the gap between Kelly and East/Meyler is a similar size to the gap between Baker and Kelly.
As I said, if we get an upgrade then fine - but given the tiny fee and our perilous financial position, we'll do very well indeed to get an upgrade.
Social media is a toxic place for footballers. Lose a game/make a mistake and you apologise on twitter, then people say it's just a PR stunt and not genuine, don't write anything and people say you don't care. See the reaction after Stevenage away last season. It's really a loss - loss situation for the playersSnowflake Royal wrote:He commented that the squad never felt in danger of relegation the season before last. Which is worrying. And Gomes publically criticised his attitude (and performance) post Sheff U. So there's enough to speculate on.0SCIAG wrote:I really like Gomes but he's made a mistake here. Losing one of our best midfielders for such a small fee, and to a bigger club, is a joke.
If that fee lets us get someone better in (Baker being the obvious option) or lets us get two adequate first teamers, then it makes sense, but that seems unlikely, and otherwise it's one of the most baffling sales of recent years.
There have been a few comments about his attitude. Can't work out if this are veiled remarks about something I've missed. I pay zero attention to social media so if he's been sexually harassing people in Instagram then obviously I retract my comments.
Oh and some melts are upset because he posted some social stuff on social media after we lost a few times.
You mean where Gunter apologised on behalf of our club captain who had acted like a twat?URZZZZ wrote:Social media is a toxic place for footballers. Lose a game/make a mistake and you apologise on twitter, then people say it's just a PR stunt and not genuine, don't write anything and people say you don't care. See the reaction after Stevenage away last season. It's really a loss - loss situation for the playersSnowflake Royal wrote:He commented that the squad never felt in danger of relegation the season before last. Which is worrying. And Gomes publically criticised his attitude (and performance) post Sheff U. So there's enough to speculate on.0SCIAG wrote:I really like Gomes but he's made a mistake here. Losing one of our best midfielders for such a small fee, and to a bigger club, is a joke.
If that fee lets us get someone better in (Baker being the obvious option) or lets us get two adequate first teamers, then it makes sense, but that seems unlikely, and otherwise it's one of the most baffling sales of recent years.
There have been a few comments about his attitude. Can't work out if this are veiled remarks about something I've missed. I pay zero attention to social media so if he's been sexually harassing people in Instagram then obviously I retract my comments.
Oh and some melts are upset because he posted some social stuff on social media after we lost a few times.
You would hope that Gomes will add more steel to midfield. Allowing Swift a freer role with less defensive duties.Snowflake Royal wrote: Shame with Kelly gone it's him or Swift alongside Rino.
Stevanage was the single lowest point of supporting Reading for me. No desire, no heart, no plan, and a captain who looked like he couldn't care less. It was lower L2 opposition ffs.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:You mean where Gunter apologised on behalf of our club captain who had acted like a twat?URZZZZ wrote:Social media is a toxic place for footballers. Lose a game/make a mistake and you apologise on twitter, then people say it's just a PR stunt and not genuine, don't write anything and people say you don't care. See the reaction after Stevenage away last season. It's really a loss - loss situation for the playersSnowflake Royal wrote: He commented that the squad never felt in danger of relegation the season before last. Which is worrying. And Gomes publically criticised his attitude (and performance) post Sheff U. So there's enough to speculate on.0
Oh and some melts are upset because he posted some social stuff on social media after we lost a few times.
Couldn't agree more with all of that. Think Gunter has been very harshly treated and everything I've seen he seems an absolute gent off the pitch.Chameleon wrote:Stevanage was the single lowest point of supporting Reading for me. No desire, no heart, no plan, and a captain who looked like he couldn't care less. It was lower L2 opposition ffs.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:You mean where Gunter apologised on behalf of our club captain who had acted like a twat?URZZZZ wrote:
Social media is a toxic place for footballers. Lose a game/make a mistake and you apologise on twitter, then people say it's just a PR stunt and not genuine, don't write anything and people say you don't care. See the reaction after Stevenage away last season. It's really a loss - loss situation for the players
And on that point it's part of the reason why I like Gunter, he's one player who quite clearly runs and runs for the club and actually looks like he gives a f*ck every time he puts on the hoops. He'd be vastly better rated if he didn't have to cover for the RM as well as occasionally the CB as well.
If you've got one man who you're relying on for crossing it it, blocking crosses, and heading crosses away inside the box almost every phase of play, slating him for not being perfect at each one is pretty blind.
Totally agree, hope Gunter ends up staying for at least one more season.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Couldn't agree more with all of that. Think Gunter has been very harshly treated and everything I've seen he seems an absolute gent off the pitch.Chameleon wrote:Stevanage was the single lowest point of supporting Reading for me. No desire, no heart, no plan, and a captain who looked like he couldn't care less. It was lower L2 opposition ffs.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
You mean where Gunter apologised on behalf of our club captain who had acted like a twat?
And on that point it's part of the reason why I like Gunter, he's one player who quite clearly runs and runs for the club and actually looks like he gives a f*ck every time he puts on the hoops. He'd be vastly better rated if he didn't have to cover for the RM as well as occasionally the CB as well.
If you've got one man who you're relying on for crossing it it, blocking crosses, and heading crosses away inside the box almost every phase of play, slating him for not being perfect at each one is pretty blind.
I don't get this harshly treated view. He has been told upfront by the manager that he doesn't see him as part of his first team plans and given ample opportunity to find another club before the August deadline.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Couldn't agree more with all of that. Think Gunter has been very harshly treated and everything I've seen he seems an absolute gent off the pitch.Chameleon wrote:Stevanage was the single lowest point of supporting Reading for me. No desire, no heart, no plan, and a captain who looked like he couldn't care less. It was lower L2 opposition ffs.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
You mean where Gunter apologised on behalf of our club captain who had acted like a twat?
And on that point it's part of the reason why I like Gunter, he's one player who quite clearly runs and runs for the club and actually looks like he gives a f*ck every time he puts on the hoops. He'd be vastly better rated if he didn't have to cover for the RM as well as occasionally the CB as well.
If you've got one man who you're relying on for crossing it it, blocking crosses, and heading crosses away inside the box almost every phase of play, slating him for not being perfect at each one is pretty blind.
I was meaning more harshly treated by the fans.Stranded wrote:I don't get this harshly treated view. He has been told upfront by the manager that he doesn't see him as part of his first team plans and given ample opportunity to find another club before the August deadline.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Couldn't agree more with all of that. Think Gunter has been very harshly treated and everything I've seen he seems an absolute gent off the pitch.Chameleon wrote:
Stevanage was the single lowest point of supporting Reading for me. No desire, no heart, no plan, and a captain who looked like he couldn't care less. It was lower L2 opposition ffs.
And on that point it's part of the reason why I like Gunter, he's one player who quite clearly runs and runs for the club and actually looks like he gives a f*ck every time he puts on the hoops. He'd be vastly better rated if he didn't have to cover for the RM as well as occasionally the CB as well.
If you've got one man who you're relying on for crossing it it, blocking crosses, and heading crosses away inside the box almost every phase of play, slating him for not being perfect at each one is pretty blind.
He has full access to the club facilities to keep fit whilst his agent works on getting him a new club. He is also being paid handsomely to do so. He has also not on tour so as to further give himself a chance to find alternative employment.
If that does not happen, or he chooses not to move, he will have been made aware he is not in tbe 1st team squad at least to start with. Given he fell out of favour last season, I doubt any of this is a shock to him plus at his age, he will want to play not be back up to younger players.
So all in all, Gunter and all the players we are looking to shift have been handled pretty well - it is now up to their well paid agents to get them a move or accept the likelihood they will be paid not to play until at least January, when they could move again.
In that case, fully on boardJagermesiter1871 wrote:I was meaning more harshly treated by the fans.Stranded wrote:I don't get this harshly treated view. He has been told upfront by the manager that he doesn't see him as part of his first team plans and given ample opportunity to find another club before the August deadline.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
Couldn't agree more with all of that. Think Gunter has been very harshly treated and everything I've seen he seems an absolute gent off the pitch.
He has full access to the club facilities to keep fit whilst his agent works on getting him a new club. He is also being paid handsomely to do so. He has also not on tour so as to further give himself a chance to find alternative employment.
If that does not happen, or he chooses not to move, he will have been made aware he is not in tbe 1st team squad at least to start with. Given he fell out of favour last season, I doubt any of this is a shock to him plus at his age, he will want to play not be back up to younger players.
So all in all, Gunter and all the players we are looking to shift have been handled pretty well - it is now up to their well paid agents to get them a move or accept the likelihood they will be paid not to play until at least January, when they could move again.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Sutekh and 95 guests