Crimes against anecdotes?Winston Biscuit wrote:Dean Saunders locked up for 10 weeks
Failing to provide a breath test, which one can assume means he was waaaaaaaaay over the limit.Old Man Andrews wrote:Crimes against anecdotes?Winston Biscuit wrote:Dean Saunders locked up for 10 weeks
Old Man Andrews wrote:Crimes against anecdotes?Winston Biscuit wrote:Dean Saunders locked up for 10 weeks
Does he avoid a driving ban though? He might have considered jail the lesser of two evils.Hendo wrote:Failing to provide a breath test, which one can assume means he was waaaaaaaaay over the limit.Old Man Andrews wrote:Crimes against anecdotes?Winston Biscuit wrote:Dean Saunders locked up for 10 weeks
Nope, 30 month ban.Old Man Andrews wrote:Does he avoid a driving ban though? He might have considered jail the lesser of two evils.Hendo wrote:Failing to provide a breath test, which one can assume means he was waaaaaaaaay over the limit.Old Man Andrews wrote: Crimes against anecdotes?
Excellent. Well deserved.Hendo wrote:Nope, 30 month ban.Old Man Andrews wrote:Does he avoid a driving ban though? He might have considered jail the lesser of two evils.Hendo wrote:
Failing to provide a breath test, which one can assume means he was waaaaaaaaay over the limit.
by The Enfield Royal71 » 28 Aug 2019 12:48
28 Aug 2019 12:48He may not have necessarily refused. If you cant give one (too drunk/not blowing enough) Thats the same.Sanguine wrote:If I'm understanding correctly, if he'd just given a breath sample, he'd have got a driving ban, but because he refused (both, it seems, at the roadside, and back at the station) he's got himself a prison term as well. Whoever said footballers weren't stupid?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... e-49497817The Enfield Royal71 wrote:He may not have necessarily refused. If you cant give one (too drunk/not blowing enough) Thats the same.Sanguine wrote:If I'm understanding correctly, if he'd just given a breath sample, he'd have got a driving ban, but because he refused (both, it seems, at the roadside, and back at the station) he's got himself a prison term as well. Whoever said footballers weren't stupid?
bad experience Enfielders?The Enfield Royal71 wrote:He may not have necessarily refused. If you cant give one (too drunk/not blowing enough) Thats the same.Sanguine wrote:If I'm understanding correctly, if he'd just given a breath sample, he'd have got a driving ban, but because he refused (both, it seems, at the roadside, and back at the station) he's got himself a prison term as well. Whoever said footballers weren't stupid?
Whatever do you mean genome?genome wrote:Does Talksport only employ alcoholics?

The man looks like he'll explode any second.Hendo wrote:Whatever do you mean genome?genome wrote:Does Talksport only employ alcoholics?
Again, I don't know what you mean.genome wrote:The man looks like he'll explode any second.Hendo wrote:Whatever do you mean genome?genome wrote:Does Talksport only employ alcoholics?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests