would love to see that. would also improve the standard of L2 IMO as the top few in the National League are always a pretty decent standard these days. Not sure turkeys are going to vote for Christmas though.All 72 National League clubs have written to the EFL Board demanding the introduction of three promotion and relegation spots between the two leagues from next season.
Would love to see 3 up and 3 down between the FL and NL, make it a bit easier for relegated clubs to come back quicker too.Winston Biscuit wrote:would love to see that. would also improve the standard of L2 IMO as the top few in the National League are always a pretty decent standard these days. Not sure turkeys are going to vote for Christmas though.All 72 National League clubs have written to the EFL Board demanding the introduction of three promotion and relegation spots between the two leagues from next season.
So if refs are incapable of counting to 6, what makes the FA think they can make it to 8?Winston Biscuit wrote:Rule change from next season - goalkeeper can hold on to the ball for 8 seconds and if they exceed that a corner kick to the opposing team will be given.
Current rule is 6 seconds with a free kick given to the opposing team, but it's rarely enforced.
I assume this announcement means it's going to be strictly enforced from next season, rather than now where no one really enforces it.Sutekh wrote:So if refs are incapable of counting to 6, what makes the FA think they can make it to 8?Winston Biscuit wrote:Rule change from next season - goalkeeper can hold on to the ball for 8 seconds and if they exceed that a corner kick to the opposing team will be given.
Current rule is 6 seconds with a free kick given to the opposing team, but it's rarely enforced.
Looking forward to VAR getting involved each time to make a thorough pig’s ear of it all.Winston Biscuit wrote:I assume this announcement means it's going to be strictly enforced from next season, rather than now where no one really enforces it.Sutekh wrote:So if refs are incapable of counting to 6, what makes the FA think they can make it to 8?Winston Biscuit wrote:Rule change from next season - goalkeeper can hold on to the ball for 8 seconds and if they exceed that a corner kick to the opposing team will be given.
Current rule is 6 seconds with a free kick given to the opposing team, but it's rarely enforced.
Also the refs are being told that the final 5 seconds needs to be 'visually counted on their fingers', which i assume means they hold their hand in their air and count it down so everyone can seehow much more is the ref going to have to do?! It's quite ridiculous. What happens when he starts counting then something happens which he has to deal with? More reason for fans to be faux angry
How many games into next season until we first see a goal scored from a corner awarded after 8 seconds is deemed to have been exceeded, only for one of Carragher or Neville to then show it with a timer, prove it was only 7.8 seconds, then label the ref 'an absolute disgrace' and pile into him?
It’s not working because of the state of officialling in this country is so awful. This is an issue with referees not the original law which was perfectly clear and perfectly enforceable. Wonder what the next change will be because refs aren’t doing their jobs properly.stealthpapes wrote:I can actually see the logic of it - slightly longer time, slightly less threatening penalty, so a chance to better enforce it.
Given the current law/interpretation isn't working, this feels like a reasonable tweek.
This happens fairly often, right? Different tournaments/leagues give the match officials different steers and interpretations.And is this FIFA wide or do we now have a different law operating in England than we do everywhere else?
I think the problem (and the reason refs turn a strategic blind eye to this) is that an indirect free kick in the box is always an absolute nightmare to control and administer and one they try to avoid at all costs.Sutekh wrote:So if refs are incapable of counting to 6, what makes the FA think they can make it to 8?Winston Biscuit wrote:Rule change from next season - goalkeeper can hold on to the ball for 8 seconds and if they exceed that a corner kick to the opposing team will be given.
Current rule is 6 seconds with a free kick given to the opposing team, but it's rarely enforced.
Oh you can’t put your foot up in Europestealthpapes wrote:Right. But its clearly not being enforced. So look at the potential reasons why. Time too short. Freekick perceived as too threatening.
This happens fairly often, right? Different tournaments/leagues give the match officials different steers and interpretations.And is this FIFA wide or do we now have a different law operating in England than we do everywhere else?
(Off top of head, tackles from behind were treated much more seriously in Europe than in home leagues for a solid chunk of the mid90s, same laws in place).
my favourite difference is the blasphemy law used in Italian football. You can get banned for numbers of games if you use the lords name incorrectlySilver Fox wrote:Oh you can’t put your foot up in Europestealthpapes wrote:Right. But its clearly not being enforced. So look at the potential reasons why. Time too short. Freekick perceived as too threatening.
This happens fairly often, right? Different tournaments/leagues give the match officials different steers and interpretations.And is this FIFA wide or do we now have a different law operating in England than we do everywhere else?
(Off top of head, tackles from behind were treated much more seriously in Europe than in home leagues for a solid chunk of the mid90s, same laws in place).
You can’t show your studs on the ‘nent
They take a dim view of a slightly raised shoe
So think on if you’re up against Ghent, my lad
Think on if you’re up against Ghent
Seems sensible to me - torso is where the body is 'at', anything else is a stretch or a reach from there. We shouldn't be calling offside using VAR by someone's boot.Whore Jackie wrote:FIFA are continuing trials of a new approach to offside, whereby an attacking player is onside if any part of their torso is in line with a defending player. Currently a player is offside if any body part that can legally score a goal is in advance of a defender.
Moving the line back, to where the player’s torso is in line, is gaining favour among lawmakers, with the rationale that not only would it be a more balanced cut off point, but that the torso is easier to capture using tracking software, potentially allowing for quicker decisions.
This seems a much more sensible approach, so no doubt it will be binned off.
I mean, its called football...Sanguine wrote: We shouldn't be calling offside using VAR by someone's boot.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 98 guests