Jacob has a knee injury.Mr Sitter wrote:Anyone got any information at all about Burns and Jacob’s injuries assuming they are injured ?
With Burns, it's bound to be a knee or elbow issue, seeing as that's 85% of his anatomy.Sutekh wrote:Jacob has a knee injury.Mr Sitter wrote:Anyone got any information at all about Burns and Jacob’s injuries assuming they are injured ?
Burns has the same injury as Fraser - an undefined knock likely to keep him out for an undefined period.
Should keep them out until about January I'd guess...Sutekh wrote:Jacob has a knee injury.Mr Sitter wrote:Anyone got any information at all about Burns and Jacob’s injuries assuming they are injured ?
Burns has the same injury as Fraser - an undefined knock likely to keep him out for an undefined period.
He scores at that rate and yet it's his fault his team doesn't win??!!Hound wrote:A fit KE yes. And yes a different sort of striker in Jan. LR will undoubtedly have someone in mind, Hunt seemed to have MoM in mind, it just don’t work ormorganb wrote:Just checking - do you expect Kelvin E and/or MOM to keep a fit Marriott out of the side and then for Couhig to bring in a (better) striker in the January window?Hound wrote:
If we are relatively successful til then, with the window opening shortly after, fair chance he won’t be getting back in the side imo if he’s out that long. Definitely in his own interest to get back sooner
Admittedly we now have a new manager but neither of these things happened earlier in the season so not sure either will happen now
To the other poster - scoring 6 in 8 or whatever is no good if your team doesn’t win when you play. He is prob an occasional starter/sub at this level
We must have been watching a completely different player then. Some of those accusations are nonsensical based on what I've seen of him. And, unlike KE at least he gets in the right position (not unlike Jamie Cureton) to grab those opportunistic tap ins.Brogue wrote:+1 he's completely ineffectual in games outside of his goals, most of which have been opportunistic tap in's . He doesn't work the channels or press the oppositions defense, he cant hold the ball up, or play with his back to goal. He's very much a sub striker who feeds off scraps in the box. Not someone who can lead the line for us. If MoM scores a few to get his season going i see him as a much more suitable striker for the second half of the season than Marriott. If kelvin plays like he did against Stevenage then there is no way Marriott starts ahead of him.Hound wrote:A fit KE yes. And yes a different sort of striker in Jan. LR will undoubtedly have someone in mind, Hunt seemed to have MoM in mind, it just don’t work ormorganb wrote:
Just checking - do you expect Kelvin E and/or MOM to keep a fit Marriott out of the side and then for Couhig to bring in a (better) striker in the January window?
Admittedly we now have a new manager but neither of these things happened earlier in the season so not sure either will happen now
To the other poster - scoring 6 in 8 or whatever is no good if your team doesn’t win when you play. He is prob an occasional starter/sub at this level
It’s not Marriotts fault as such, it’s just because he adds so little else, esp defensively, that it’s like playing with ten except his goals. Hence why we don’t get results when he plays even when he scoresRoyalBlue wrote:He scores at that rate and yet it's his fault his team doesn't win??!!Hound wrote:A fit KE yes. And yes a different sort of striker in Jan. LR will undoubtedly have someone in mind, Hunt seemed to have MoM in mind, it just don’t work ormorganb wrote:
Just checking - do you expect Kelvin E and/or MOM to keep a fit Marriott out of the side and then for Couhig to bring in a (better) striker in the January window?
Admittedly we now have a new manager but neither of these things happened earlier in the season so not sure either will happen now
To the other poster - scoring 6 in 8 or whatever is no good if your team doesn’t win when you play. He is prob an occasional starter/sub at this level
KE has had about one game where he has played really well and worked hard. His fitness levels are questionable and I suspect he is one of those that LR was referring to when he complained about lack of fitness at this stage of the season. Nor does he have a natural strikers instincts in the way that Marriott does. He can do a job for us but IMO it's not as a main/central striker.
Was the follow up question why not !!Mid Sussex Royal wrote:From today's press conference, Richardson said he would not be giving updates on injured players. I can understand this on players due back but it would be nice to know now and then how the longer term absentees are doing.
Maybe he thinks it...Royals and Racers wrote:Was the follow up question why not !!Mid Sussex Royal wrote:From today's press conference, Richardson said he would not be giving updates on injured players. I can understand this on players due back but it would be nice to know now and then how the longer term absentees are doing.
I thought the mantra of Rob Couhig was to be honest and open with the supporters !Snowflake Royal wrote:Maybe he thinks it...Royals and Racers wrote:Was the follow up question why not !!Mid Sussex Royal wrote:From today's press conference, Richardson said he would not be giving updates on injured players. I can understand this on players due back but it would be nice to know now and then how the longer term absentees are doing.
puts unnecessary pressure on injured players?
sets fan expectations for a return and causes disatisfaction when there are unanticipated delays?
allows him to hide internal issues around performance under a mask of potential injury?
isn’t any of the fans' business to know about medical issues of players?
masks potential squad movements if players aren't being selected because they're about to be sold / returned to their home club?
About his running the club. Not anything to do with the manager's job.Royals and Racers wrote:I thought the mantra of Rob Couhig was to be honest and open with the supporters !Snowflake Royal wrote:Maybe he thinks it...Royals and Racers wrote: Was the follow up question why not !!
puts unnecessary pressure on injured players?
sets fan expectations for a return and causes disatisfaction when there are unanticipated delays?
allows him to hide internal issues around performance under a mask of potential injury?
isn’t any of the fans' business to know about medical issues of players?
masks potential squad movements if players aren't being selected because they're about to be sold / returned to their home club?
Keeping schtum only leads to speculation and will eventually come out from sources within the medical dept.
Or numerous other potential leaking points within the club.Royals and Racers wrote:I thought the mantra of Rob Couhig was to be honest and open with the supporters !Snowflake Royal wrote:Maybe he thinks it...Royals and Racers wrote: Was the follow up question why not !!
puts unnecessary pressure on injured players?
sets fan expectations for a return and causes disatisfaction when there are unanticipated delays?
allows him to hide internal issues around performance under a mask of potential injury?
isn’t any of the fans' business to know about medical issues of players?
masks potential squad movements if players aren't being selected because they're about to be sold / returned to their home club?
Keeping schtum only leads to speculation and will eventually come out from sources within the medical dept.
So the manager's wife got sacked even before he joined the club?Snowflake Royal wrote:About his running the club. Not anything to do with the manager's job.Royals and Racers wrote:I thought the mantra of Rob Couhig was to be honest and open with the supporters !Snowflake Royal wrote: Maybe he thinks it...
puts unnecessary pressure on injured players?
sets fan expectations for a return and causes disatisfaction when there are unanticipated delays?
allows him to hide internal issues around performance under a mask of potential injury?
isn’t any of the fans' business to know about medical issues of players?
masks potential squad movements if players aren't being selected because they're about to be sold / returned to their home club?
Keeping schtum only leads to speculation and will eventually come out from sources within the medical dept.
He also said leakers get sacked.
Exactly !RoyalBlue wrote:Or numerous other potential leaking points within the club.Royals and Racers wrote:I thought the mantra of Rob Couhig was to be honest and open with the supporters !Snowflake Royal wrote: Maybe he thinks it...
puts unnecessary pressure on injured players?
sets fan expectations for a return and causes disatisfaction when there are unanticipated delays?
allows him to hide internal issues around performance under a mask of potential injury?
isn’t any of the fans' business to know about medical issues of players?
masks potential squad movements if players aren't being selected because they're about to be sold / returned to their home club?
Keeping schtum only leads to speculation and will eventually come out from sources within the medical dept.
We don't necessarily want nor need full details on the medical issues relating to each individual player. What we would like to know is, based on latest assessments, how long they are likely to be unavailable for. Err on the pessimistic side if they're worried about raising fans' expectations. And if there is a good reason why they can't do that with a particular player(s) e.g. awaiting results of scans and/or to see specialist, just say so.
Wouldn’t CBD oil be safer ?Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Bit of injury info from Leam via the new Chronicle guy....
Marriott close to a return
Fraser progressing - on the grass now
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 163 guests