Same here. I sit in the Upper West with my son, and it will cost me £600 to renew the traditional way, or an extra £200 with the new bundles. I’m already on 1600+ points, so this scheme has no real benefit for me.PieEater wrote: ↑30 Apr 2026 17:33 I dont like change.
I'll be sticking with the ST single payment.
I also note that the points change if I miss a game will encourage people to hand STs to other people, so the club could miss out on revenue. Seems like a daft idea to me, why put that penalty on if you've paid the money?
And me, always thought the fact that you commit a large chunk of money up front, you get the points to reflect that so a bit disappointed the club doesn't recognise that as a big commitment anymore, can't be arsed to worry about a few points here or there though.PieEater wrote: ↑30 Apr 2026 17:33 I dont like change.
I'll be sticking with the ST single payment.
I also note that the points change if I miss a game will encourage people to hand STs to other people, so the club could miss out on revenue. Seems like a daft idea to me, why put that penalty on if you've paid the money?
Another scenario around not giving points for games you don't attend, however I doubt you'll have any problem getting tickets for any northern game.Royalscot wrote: ↑30 Apr 2026 23:47 I now live in Scotland since 2022 and do attend a reasonable number of home games, hence why a season ticket to sit with my friends for over 25 years is the right thing to do. I will also attend a reasonable number of away matches in the northern half of England it is a shame that my loyalty after having been a season ticket holder since 1997 will impact the games I can now easily get to to. I do fly from Scotland and back on the same day for those home games I can attend, which does incur more expense than those who live locally which is my choice to support my team.
I fully understand that football teams are generally a locally supported, however it is not beyond the IT utilised to help those closer to away games to support the team and be given a fair chance to do so, especially if they are a season ticket holder.
As a distant customer, but a loyal one the One Royal holds no appeal to me personally. Perhaps they should consider those which are quite a few some degree of obtaining away tickets.
I am not against change but always to be inclusive.

Or some may not bother at all.RoyalBlue wrote: ↑30 Apr 2026 16:27 I'm a season ticket holder but for a variety of different reasons, probably can't get to somewhere between 5 and 10 games a season.
Next season, it appears that I have an option to either pay up front for a season ticket or commit to 12 monthly payments, yet only get loyalty points for the games I can actually get to.
Looks like I might be better off not making any commitment and just paying for tickets when I can attend.
It would seem crazy if you couldn't. Why would they want to miss out on a larger lump sum up front? They could still have auto-renew (with 3 months' notice required to opt out).katweslowski wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:07 Can someone just tell me... I don't want monthly payments, I avoid them wherever possible - including insurance, council tax even, and just prefer an annual or one-off fee.
Can I still benefit from the higher tiers by just paying a lump sum?
No.katweslowski wrote: ↑01 May 2026 10:07 Can someone just tell me... I don't want monthly payments, I avoid them wherever possible - including insurance, council tax even, and just prefer an annual or one-off fee.
Can I still benefit from the higher tiers by just paying a lump sum?
Counter-productive if that leads to people deciding not to get a season ticket or sign up to One Royal. Good luck with encouraging enough additional people to pay to attend every game to compensate for those lost up front sales.Elm Park Kid wrote: ↑01 May 2026 12:37 I disagree. I think you should only get the points for attending games, not paying for a ticket.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests