by Platypuss » 01 Jul 2006 07:00
by The 17 Bus » 01 Jul 2006 07:36
by PieEater » 01 Jul 2006 10:16
by Matt de K » 01 Jul 2006 12:02
by Row Z Royal » 01 Jul 2006 12:48
by Volvicanus » 01 Jul 2006 13:15
Row Z Royal John Howarth is a moron. Fact. Trust nothing he suggests for our roads.
If you've looked at the plan for the Butter Market, you'll know what I mean.
Furthermore, he's not the most respected person in the Council Chamber either.
by The 17 Bus » 01 Jul 2006 14:37
by Jerry St Clair » 01 Jul 2006 19:53
by The 17 Bus » 01 Jul 2006 20:49
by Platypuss » 02 Jul 2006 00:59
The 17 Bus As indeed was posted on here a long time ago, regarding how dangerous it was, still WDC do similar at Shinfield, just one life lost so far tho.
by 66DD » 02 Jul 2006 06:25
PlatypussThe 17 Bus As indeed was posted on here a long time ago, regarding how dangerous it was, still WDC do similar at Shinfield, just one life lost so far tho.
That roundabout is fine - plenty of morons who can't stay within their lanes though.
by The 17 Bus » 02 Jul 2006 06:36
PlatypussThe 17 Bus As indeed was posted on here a long time ago, regarding how dangerous it was, still WDC do similar at Shinfield, just one life lost so far tho.
That roundabout is fine - plenty of morons who can't stay within their lanes though.
by Row Z Royal » 02 Jul 2006 11:44
The 17 BusPlatypussThe 17 Bus As indeed was posted on here a long time ago, regarding how dangerous it was, still WDC do similar at Shinfield, just one life lost so far tho.
That roundabout is fine - plenty of morons who can't stay within their lanes though.
Not many seem to share that view, the lanes do not naturally follow on some of the sections, coming from Shinfield then turn righ to Lower Earley is the most glaringly one that is wrong.
by AthleticoSpizz » 02 Jul 2006 18:01
wait till he erects the Ken Livingstone gantriesThe 17 Bus Heard traffic supremo John Howarth talking bout this the other day, he said it will allow the council to monitor the lights so that traffic can flow better.
by M U R T Y » 02 Jul 2006 23:47
Row Z RoyalThe 17 BusPlatypussThe 17 Bus As indeed was posted on here a long time ago, regarding how dangerous it was, still WDC do similar at Shinfield, just one life lost so far tho.
That roundabout is fine - plenty of morons who can't stay within their lanes though.
Not many seem to share that view, the lanes do not naturally follow on some of the sections, coming from Shinfield then turn righ to Lower Earley is the most glaringly one that is wrong.
The Roundabout of Doom is by far and away the worst roundabout ever designed.
It probably looked really good on the design board, but like some many others, the designers have failed to take into account how practical it would be. If everyone sticks to their lane it's fine, but it only takes one person in a bit a hurry to cause the system to break down.
I prefered the old double roundabout there and that was bad!!!
by Chicken Balti Pie » 03 Jul 2006 01:35
by Yahoops » 03 Jul 2006 08:42
by fridays child » 03 Jul 2006 08:55
Yahoops I am thinking of travelling to games by helicoptor, where's the nearest landing spot that beats the traffic?
by Scarface » 03 Jul 2006 13:43
Yahoops I am thinking of travelling to games by helicoptor, where's the nearest landing spot that beats the traffic?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests