Yes - it was all down to you. Well doneiang040563 wrote:I sent this email to JM at the weekend - about an hour before "his signature" appeared on the Petition. Do you think this had anything to do with it?
I wasn't aware that our high level of discontent focused on Radio Berkshire's decision 'not to pay the live commentary fee that we (RFC)requested for the forthcoming Premiership season.'bluehoops wrote:From the Official Site:
"We are aware that some supporters are unhappy with the announcement that BBC Radio Berkshire has decided not to pay the live commentary fee that we requested for the forthcoming Premiership season.
107 deny they have an exclusive agreement, although it will work out that way if nobody else comes to an agreement to buy the rights.RoyalBlue wrote:their subsequent decision to grant exclusive rights to a radio station (partly owned by the Chairman) with an extremely poor area of coverage in a contest that many suspect took place on a far from level playing field!
Jay wrote:1077 - Boyd Butler - We are currently talking with BBC Radio Berkshire in the hope we can sort something out, for a fee less than has been reported. What we don't want is unhappy supporter. The fans must come first.
Yes, Boyd. Whatever you say.EP wrote:When the Evening Post put it to Mr Madejski that half a million listeners would lose out on hearing live matches, he said: ?Okay, tell them to send me a pound each and I?ll give it [the rights] back to Radio Berkshire.?
If they want to plausibly deny that they "negotiated" exclusive access, perhaps they should think about editing their own website?Forbury Lion wrote:107 deny they have an exclusive agreement, although it will work out that way if nobody else comes to an agreement to buy the rights.RoyalBlue wrote:their subsequent decision to grant exclusive rights to a radio station (partly owned by the Chairman) with an extremely poor area of coverage in a contest that many suspect took place on a far from level playing field!
We should quote them too, before they change it...Platypuss wrote:If they want to plausibly deny that they "negotiated" exclusive access, perhaps they should think about editing their own website?Forbury Lion wrote:107 deny they have an exclusive agreement, although it will work out that way if nobody else comes to an agreement to buy the rights.RoyalBlue wrote:their subsequent decision to grant exclusive rights to a radio station (partly owned by the Chairman) with an extremely poor area of coverage in a contest that many suspect took place on a far from level playing field!
http://www.reading107fm.com/page.pl?id=5
As you can see though they did it for us of course!In other news, Reading 107 are delighted to announce exclusive rights to the Royals 2006-2007 Premiership Campaign.
The Royal Box will provide unrivalled commentary from a range of voices, including Players, Coaching Staff, ex-Royals...and of course, most importantly, you!
The last line proves that 1077 is fake! Either that or BB has recently undertaken a trip to Damascus!Jay wrote:1077 - Boyd Butler - We are currently talking with BBC Radio Berkshire in the hope we can sort something out, for a fee less than has been reported. What we don't want is unhappy supporter. The fans must come first.
*Cough*
But why should people just accept it is the way RFC have always been and learn to live with it? If people protest/complain/make their views known, perhaps there's just a miniscule chance that the club might start to take note and things might start to improve.Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:
Why try and start arguements on this thread for the sake of it?
.
juvenile mode on# "...to annoy you? " juvenile mode off#
Listen, Reading FC have, in the past been absolutely crap at PR. They are now and probably continue to be in the future.
It is part of the world that is " supporting the Royals ". Learn to live with it.
I have.
I am currently in negotiations with Reading FC myself about another matter and believe me I'm pulling my hair out. That is the way it is.
True, but after a couple of decades you get a little weiry...........RoyalBlue wrote:But why should people just accept it is the way RFC have always been and learn to live with it? If people protest/complain/make their views known, perhaps there's just a miniscule chance that the club might start to take note and things might start to improve.Gordons Cumming wrote:Alan Partridge wrote:
Why try and start arguements on this thread for the sake of it?
.
juvenile mode on# "...to annoy you? " juvenile mode off#
Listen, Reading FC have, in the past been absolutely crap at PR. They are now and probably continue to be in the future.
It is part of the world that is " supporting the Royals ". Learn to live with it.
I have.
I am currently in negotiations with Reading FC myself about another matter and believe me I'm pulling my hair out. That is the way it is.
One thing's certain, learn to live with it, put up with it and things are never going to get any better.
Did they do the better commentary when they weren't doing any?LJ wrote:I have to say i am glad the the shambles that was BBC radio berkshire's radio comentary has ended. I have always believed that 107 do the better commentary, get better interviews and are overall more professional.
I don't believe Boyd B has found God, that would be stretching the imagination a bit too far, what I do think is that the club are now desperatley trying to create a silk purse out of a self inflicted Pig's ear of a decision.RoyalBlue wrote:I don't believe Boyd B has found God,Jay wrote:1077 - Boyd Butler - We are currently talking with BBC Radio Berkshire in the hope we can sort something out, for a fee less than has been reported. What we don't want is unhappy supporter. The fans must come first.
*Cough*
The last line proves that 1077 is fake! Either that or BB has recently undertaken a trip to Damascus!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 38 guests