Victor Meldrew wrote:It was Zammo who asked the question about evidence against Blatter-if only you and others would read things properly rather than diving in with your size 12s you would realise that my input was to point out that in this country we have a habit of picking on foreign hate figures just because we don't get our own way (latterly our pathetic world cup bid where we sent the 3 stooges).Royal Rother wrote:It's one of the most frustrating things on the periphery of my life that despite everyone on the planet except for Victor Meldrew knows that Blatter is a disgusting corrupt slime ball and he has been allowed to get away with it for decades.
I liken him to Lance Armstrong, Jimmy Savile etc. but his misdeeds are far more common knowledge and accepted without question than the others.
He'll die before he gets put away.
Cnut.
In my lifetime there was Charles de Galle followed by many French and German presidents and EU leaders seen as anti-English.
As a nation we seem to have lost the art of diplomacy whether that be the FA in terms of world football, the MCC in world cricket or currently our very own slimeball (to use RR's word relating to Blatter) Cameron in his pathetic attempts to change the terms of our EU membership.
We want to be part of everything but also want to tell the foreigners what to do, forgetting that this is 2015 and not 1815 when we were very busy telling the world what to do and using force (not diplomacy) to get our own way.
Back to Blatter and FIFA-it's surely a good thing that the Yanks are doing their best to expose corruption with the help of their own freeloader turned witness and the outcome might be that there is greater openness concerning world cup bids and who knows, if the FA manages to continue to supress details of fans' violence that still exist in this country and manages to convince FIFA that this is a safe country in which to hold a tournament, we might get the world cup again in 2066.
wingnut wrote:While not for one second disagreeing with the as sterile that a latter is a massively corrupt tool, the shambles of the decision to award the World Cup to Qatar can't be laid at his door; he was in favour of it going to USA and his rival in the presidential election (this and the last one) of course was strongly in favour of the Qatari bid. Platini voted for Qatar too.
The biggest cock up in the whole Qatari bid farce though was FIFA's own evaluation of the bid - ignoring its own rules about the number of cities, ignoring that 9 of the stadiums would be within 20 miles of each other and ignoring their human rights abuses and booze bans, never mind that the tournament would be unplayable in the summer.
They forced the Brazilian government to make an amendment to their no beer inside stadiums law last summer, so I'm sure they'll manage to twist the Qatari's arm.Sutekh wrote:wingnut wrote:While not for one second disagreeing with the as sterile that a latter is a massively corrupt tool, the shambles of the decision to award the World Cup to Qatar can't be laid at his door; he was in favour of it going to USA and his rival in the presidential election (this and the last one) of course was strongly in favour of the Qatari bid. Platini voted for Qatar too.
The biggest cock up in the whole Qatari bid farce though was FIFA's own evaluation of the bid - ignoring its own rules about the number of cities, ignoring that 9 of the stadiums would be within 20 miles of each other and ignoring their human rights abuses and booze bans, never mind that the tournament would be unplayable in the summer.
I'm sure FIFA will get round the booze bans by explaining it's a requirement of hosting the tournament and nothing to do with the megawonga they'll get from whatever brewing company they'll have a partnership with of course.
Reveal yourself.Sutekh wrote:Victor Meldrew wrote:It was Zammo who asked the question about evidence against Blatter-if only you and others would read things properly rather than diving in with your size 12s you would realise that my input was to point out that in this country we have a habit of picking on foreign hate figures just because we don't get our own way (latterly our pathetic world cup bid where we sent the 3 stooges).Royal Rother wrote:It's one of the most frustrating things on the periphery of my life that despite everyone on the planet except for Victor Meldrew knows that Blatter is a disgusting corrupt slime ball and he has been allowed to get away with it for decades.
I liken him to Lance Armstrong, Jimmy Savile etc. but his misdeeds are far more common knowledge and accepted without question than the others.
He'll die before he gets put away.
Cnut.
In my lifetime there was Charles de Galle followed by many French and German presidents and EU leaders seen as anti-English.
As a nation we seem to have lost the art of diplomacy whether that be the FA in terms of world football, the MCC in world cricket or currently our very own slimeball (to use RR's word relating to Blatter) Cameron in his pathetic attempts to change the terms of our EU membership.
We want to be part of everything but also want to tell the foreigners what to do, forgetting that this is 2015 and not 1815 when we were very busy telling the world what to do and using force (not diplomacy) to get our own way.
Back to Blatter and FIFA-it's surely a good thing that the Yanks are doing their best to expose corruption with the help of their own freeloader turned witness and the outcome might be that there is greater openness concerning world cup bids and who knows, if the FA manages to continue to supress details of fans' violence that still exist in this country and manages to convince FIFA that this is a safe country in which to hold a tournament, we might get the world cup again in 2066.
Hi Dave.
Most of UEFA is supporting Ali in the vote (about 46 countries). Ali has advised UEFA today that he believes that he has around 60 votes from other non European nations. If so, if UEFA didn't turn up it would hand Blatter the presidency again.Kitsondinho wrote:If (when) Blatter wins tomorrow, David Gill will not take his seat as UEFA Ex-co member. A good move from the various GB FAs. Sadly I'm sure we will be the only ones to take this action and it will only be symbolic as UEFA are already back tracking on their threat to boycott the vote/ future meetings.
Was that a real headline? If so it makes my eyes bleed.Sutekh wrote:BBC advising FIFA's sponsors are also voicing concerns...
Blatter is going to win. UEFA know that, Platini said as much himself earlier. The only way to oust him is putting enough pressure on him to force him out. Platini's comments about what will happen after Blatter wins tomorrow were very interesting, I really think the end is almost here for our beloved Sepp. Too many things are starting to come together and that speech he gave, he looked old, tired and really rattled. That was not the confident, defiant Blatter normally seen. He knows that he is one interview away from being caught.Stranded wrote:Most of UEFA is supporting Ali in the vote (about 46 countries). Ali has advised UEFA today that he believes that he has around 60 votes from other non European nations. If so, if UEFA didn't turn up it would hand Blatter the presidency again.Kitsondinho wrote:If (when) Blatter wins tomorrow, David Gill will not take his seat as UEFA Ex-co member. A good move from the various GB FAs. Sadly I'm sure we will be the only ones to take this action and it will only be symbolic as UEFA are already back tracking on their threat to boycott the vote/ future meetings.
As is, he is still likely to win but if Ali gets 100+ votes, he will at least take it to a second vote and if he gets 106 in that then he will win. Blatter winning is based on Asia & Africa voting en bloc for him, with the events of the past few days it wouldn't surprise me if a handful jump ship and that may well be enough.
Suppression of human rights violations and rampant racism wasn't necessary for Qatar and Russia to have successful bids.Victor Meldrew wrote:....who knows, if the FA manages to continue to supress details of fans' violence that still exist in this country and manages to convince FIFA that this is a safe country in which to hold a tournament, we might get the world cup again in 2066.
Spot on. Then let's see where all those nations that support Blatter go when they realise that without involvement from those parties their football revenue will more or less dry up.Kitsondinho wrote:So Blatter is now saying all of football must take responsibilty (including him) for the changes that need to be made. Yesterday, he was explaining it wasn't his fault and therefore it wasn't his responsibility. Gotta love Sepp logic. As for UEFA, why the delegates who aren't gonna vote for him later didn't walk out on him this morning, I don't know. Yes the same would happen to Prince Ali bin Al-Hussein later on....but Blatter is going to win anyway! UEFA, Australia, US, Canada and NZ need to work together on this to oust him. Don't vote, boycott FIFA until he goes. If he doesn't, don't allow European based players to travel to W/Cup qualifiers etc....The CL clubs would LOVE that!
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 19 guests