by Winston Biscuit » 27 Oct 2022 11:29
27 Oct 2022 11:29by Royality creeps In » 27 Oct 2022 15:49
27 Oct 2022 15:49Agreed Horrible clubWinston Biscuit wrote:really hope Spurs go out
by Ascotexgunner » 27 Oct 2022 20:37
27 Oct 2022 20:37Good news is that there's several ex gooner rejects in that Marseilles side. Some of them may yet become Arsenal legends.Winston Biscuit wrote:really hope Spurs go out
by Vision » 27 Oct 2022 21:09
27 Oct 2022 21:09Cheers, as I suspected, I never really knew what the law actually wasStranded wrote:It has always been the case that the direction of the ball is meaningless when it comes to offside decisions (at least for as long as I can remember). The only things that are important are (alongside the relatively new active passage of play part)Vision wrote:I'm hoping someone can confirm if it's always been the law that you can be offside even if the ball travels backwards at the point you're supposedly in an offside position. Also as an aside if VAR is drawing a line from the actual ball, what part of the ball are they drawing it from? The centre? The furthest point forward? The furthest point back?Royal Rother wrote:
Don’t think clear and obvious error comes into it.
It’s just offside or not.
It may be that I've had this law wrong all along but my concern here is that the laws are being set to help service VAR rather than VAR being there to service the laws.
That said watching Conte lose his ever loving shite was amusing.
1. Are there 2 defenders (one may be the GK) between you and the goal?
2. If 1 is no, are you behind the ball when it was passed to you?
Naturally, 99.9% of the time if you are behing the ball it goes without saying that if the ball goes backwards you will be behind the ball but in this instance Kane was fractionally in front of it which meant he was offside.
by Loafer » 27 Oct 2022 23:10
27 Oct 2022 23:10
by Stranded » 28 Oct 2022 09:15
28 Oct 2022 09:15It's his "thing".Loafer wrote:Wtaf was anthony doing randomly spinning around like that on the ball in acres of space![]()
![]()
![]()
Ten haag was fuming at him
by Loafer » 28 Oct 2022 09:33
28 Oct 2022 09:33Its oxf*rd weird and pointlessStranded wrote:It's his "thing".Loafer wrote:Wtaf was anthony doing randomly spinning around like that on the ball in acres of space![]()
![]()
![]()
Ten haag was fuming at him
by Stranded » 28 Oct 2022 09:50
28 Oct 2022 09:50"things" normally are. He's clearly hoping he'll be able to trademark it or something and use to sell t-shirts etc.Loafer wrote:Its oxf*rd weird and pointlessStranded wrote:It's his "thing".Loafer wrote:Wtaf was anthony doing randomly spinning around like that on the ball in acres of space![]()
![]()
![]()
Ten haag was fuming at him
by From Despair To Where? » 28 Oct 2022 18:33
28 Oct 2022 18:33I don't mind showboating as such as long as its not followed by a pass that rolls harmlessly out for a goal kick.Loafer wrote:Wtaf was anthony doing randomly spinning around like that on the ball in acres of space![]()
![]()
![]()
Ten haag was fuming at him
by Loafer » 28 Oct 2022 19:13
28 Oct 2022 19:13Showboating is fine if you beat a man or trick somebodyFrom Despair To Where? wrote:I don't mind showboating as such as long as its not followed by a pass that rolls harmlessly out for a goal kick.Loafer wrote:Wtaf was anthony doing randomly spinning around like that on the ball in acres of space![]()
![]()
![]()
Ten haag was fuming at him
When that happens, you look an utter bellend.
by Winston Biscuit » 01 Nov 2022 21:55
01 Nov 2022 21:55by Loafer » 01 Nov 2022 21:57
01 Nov 2022 21:57+1Winston Biscuit wrote:Kane's diving really is embarrassing
by Winston Biscuit » 01 Nov 2022 22:00
01 Nov 2022 22:00by Loafer » 02 Nov 2022 06:11
02 Nov 2022 06:11Rooney?Winston Biscuit wrote:I don't remember the last time (or ever) England had a captain I found so easily dislikable as Kane
by Stranded » 02 Nov 2022 10:10
02 Nov 2022 10:10by genome » 02 Nov 2022 10:12
02 Nov 2022 10:12by Conservative_dad » 02 Nov 2022 13:17
02 Nov 2022 13:17by Sutekh » 02 Nov 2022 15:54
02 Nov 2022 15:54Marseille had to win to qualify for the last 16 any other result would take Spurs through. From what I saw in the last half of the first half I thought Marseille were destroying Spurs so surprised to see Spurs win but then if you don’t create much despite a ton of possession there’s always a chance you’ll get done at the other end of the pitch.genome wrote:Their manager was on the pitch basically begging the ref to blow up for 1-1. I don't know why Marseille chucked everyone forward to get a winner, they could've just taken the draw.
Good strike from Hojbjerg though to be fair, proper hit
by Conservative_dad » 02 Nov 2022 18:30
02 Nov 2022 18:30Conte's M.O. tbfSutekh wrote:Marseille had to win to qualify for the last 16 any other result would take Spurs through. From what I saw in the last half of the first half I thought Marseille were destroying Spurs so surprised to see Spurs win but then if you don’t create much despite a ton of possession there’s always a chance you’ll get done at the other end of the pitch.genome wrote:Their manager was on the pitch basically begging the ref to blow up for 1-1. I don't know why Marseille chucked everyone forward to get a winner, they could've just taken the draw.
Good strike from Hojbjerg though to be fair, proper hit
by Hendo » 02 Nov 2022 19:11
02 Nov 2022 19:11Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests