They also had the picture framer in Woodley who has been getting calls because whoever produced these leaflets put the wrong phone number on them
I went to that, and believe I saw you there too, but the word that springs to mind is tumbleweed. The club officials must have outnumbered those looking at the plans.Behindu wrote:
There was a widely publicised evening at the club where the plans were on show, the club and the architects were available to dicsuss any aspect of the plans and very few people actually went along to have a look.
At that session the club were open to all sorts of suggestions and (for example) disabled fans have been in long and detailed discussion about the facilities and I believe have had changes made.
To be fair the leaflet about the meeting did imply it was for businesses and 'interest groups' rather than individuals, but I gate crashed quite easily despite not being one of those !starliaison wrote:I went to that, and believe I saw you there too, but the word that springs to mind is tumbleweed. The club officials must have outnumbered those looking at the plans.
Do the figures exist or is it just an assumption? Have they worked out what the normal supporter spends per head when they come to a game? I know they can sell corporate hospitality at what appears to be a high price but that hospitality is not cheap to provide and you can't cram in as many bums on seats.bigmike wrote:Of course it is if not why have it?RoyalBlue wrote:I'd be interested in knowing how much the club believe they make per square foot of corporate hospitality compared to that they get from each square foot of ordinary supporter seating.
I wonder whether the difference in income per square foot is as much as people might assume.
Symantecs. You're taking away long standing loyal supporters for those who can afford a privileged, hospitality seat.Behindu wrote:Has it not already been stated that there is NOT a plan to put boxes in the East Stand....
That's right - more money for the club to help them to keep on progressing.Gregster wrote:Boxes / padded seats, it will all have the same effect.
Gregster - have received the e-mail and will respond later today.Gregster wrote:If STAR have a line of communication open with the club on this already, I would think that the best course of action is to write to STAR so they can present this feedback to the club.
I've written and will also ensure I write also to the club. Although quite what impact any of this will have remains to be seen, the club's already stated it's intentions.
Kiss good bye to east stand atmosphere when these concrete boxes line the stand. Talk about breaking up the chance to have a superb one tier stand.
Laughable.Wycombe Royal wrote:That's right - more money for the club to help them to keep on progressing.Gregster wrote:Boxes / padded seats, it will all have the same effect.
Thanks STAR, look forward to it. If there are misapprehensions, I'll be all too happy to be set right.STAR Campaigns wrote:Gregster - have received the e-mail and will respond later today.Gregster wrote:If STAR have a line of communication open with the club on this already, I would think that the best course of action is to write to STAR so they can present this feedback to the club.
I've written and will also ensure I write also to the club. Although quite what impact any of this will have remains to be seen, the club's already stated it's intentions.
Kiss good bye to east stand atmosphere when these concrete boxes line the stand. Talk about breaking up the chance to have a superb one tier stand.
But just to correct a misapprehension. No "concrete boxes will line the stand". Although, as I keep repeating, the plans are not fixed, change regularly and won't be finalised until after planning permission is granted - this is a single area, for East Stand fans, rather than a line of boxes as in the West Stand.
So I don't think it will break up the stand much more than the current disabled areas break up the current East Stand, and as it'll be full of Reading fans who will be paying a little extra to be able to get their beer without having to queue forever, it might even help the atmosphere.
Why is it laughable? Just because one revenue stream has increased it doesn't mean you should look to increase other revenue streams as well. At least those in charge of the club seem to understand that fundemental business principle. So around 600 fans are going to have to move seat - they will be compensated and will have 6000 shiny new seats to choose from.Gregster wrote:Laughable.Wycombe Royal wrote:That's right - more money for the club to help them to keep on progressing.Gregster wrote:Boxes / padded seats, it will all have the same effect.
With the revenue from Sky, our largest ever sponsors deal, this years bank balance (considering all the increased fan costs and club revenue yet a reaonsably small expenditure on players), yet again the deluded fan accepts RFC's treatment of the long term fan by citing the need for more money for RFC to continue progressing.
One question - if they hiked STs up another £200 and again gave the reason 'money to progress the club' when do you begin to question the costs?
I understand the need to support the club but surely not at the expense of fans.......
Taken to an extreme, if they introduced these seats in further areas of the stadium each season (again pushing the increased revenue to fund the club line) , how can you not admit the fact that clubs are pricing the long term fans out? It's for good reason this very fact is making national headlines.
Reclaim the East Stand. It starts here
Although there are already queues to get in and the plan is to double the number of people in the stand !.:BigDaveInTheDungeon:. wrote:plus if you want to have a beer before the game in a nice place with carpet and soft chairs the jazz cafe already serves this purpose and is free to all current season ticket holders.
I have no problem with these "fans" paying extra to get a beer. What I have a problem with is getting kicked out so that they can get a nice view of the pitch (presumably with no game in progress). What is wrong with a nice view of B&Q instead?STAR Campaigns wrote: So I don't think it will break up the stand much more than the current disabled areas break up the current East Stand, and as it'll be full of Reading fans who will be paying a little extra to be able to get their beer without having to queue forever, it might even help the atmosphere.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests