Stewards

AthleticoSpizz · by **AthleticoSpizz** » 16 Nov 2007 20:13

Schards#2 wrote:Whilst not wishing to indulge Voyeur and Behindu's worrying obsession, I feel compelled to ask what shredded paper has to do with either me or RL.

It was your lighters probably

Behindu · by **Behindu** » 16 Nov 2007 21:10

Schards#2 wrote:
Haven't either you got anything better to do with your lives?

Many things, thankfully.

The paranoia is still there though I see...

Schards#2 · by **Schards#2** » 16 Nov 2007 21:23

Behindu wrote:
Schards#2 wrote:
Haven't either you got anything better to do with your lives?
Many things, thankfully.

The paranoia is still there though I see...

Well run along and do them then, there's a good chap. You don't want to end up like voyeur.

Riseley · by **Riseley** » 19 Nov 2007 10:33

I am amazed that the constant cyber bullying of both RL and Schards is seemingly condoned by the obviously incompetent moderators. No wonder the paranoia inflicted RL has increased her consumption of Chateaux Neuf de pape to three bottles a day.

Gloria Gooner · by **Gloria Gooner** » 19 Nov 2007 11:29

voyeur wrote:
Behindu wrote:
Riseley wrote:I think our stewards are wonderful. The time I got threatened with removal of my ST for throwing shredded paper is just one example of their superb customer service skills.
The paper was very poorly shredded though....
Careful, Schards and RL may think that you are having a dig at them.

One of the most bizarre posts ever, and that's saying something. Absolutely no connection between the two whatsoever.

sheshnu · by **sheshnu** » 19 Nov 2007 11:49

Gloria Gooner wrote:One of the most bizarre posts ever, and that's saying something. Absolutely no connection between the two whatsoever.

I think that's his "point".

Riseley · by **Riseley** » 19 Nov 2007 11:50

It says a lot for the sensitivities of RL and Schards when a sweet little thing like Glo steps into the fray.

Dr Hfuhruhurr · by **Dr Hfuhruhurr** » 19 Nov 2007 12:12

sheshnu wrote:
Gloria Gooner wrote:One of the most bizarre posts ever, and that's saying something. Absolutely no connection between the two whatsoever.
I think that's his "point".

Yeah, I understood it as well.
Bit childish, though, wasnt it?

Gloria Gooner · by **Gloria Gooner** » 19 Nov 2007 12:14

Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:
sheshnu wrote:
Gloria Gooner wrote:One of the most bizarre posts ever, and that's saying something. Absolutely no connection between the two whatsoever.
I think that's his "point".
Yeah, I understood it as well.
Bit childish, though, wasnt it?

Ah, now I see. My mistake.

Behindu · by **Behindu** » 19 Nov 2007 12:15

Although there are some posters who seem prone to assuming everything written on a thread to which they may have contributed is a 'dig' at them...

Dr Hfuhruhurr · by **Dr Hfuhruhurr** » 19 Nov 2007 12:17

Behindu wrote:Although there are some posters who seem prone to assuming everything written on a thread to which they may have contributed is a 'dig' at them...

And....?

Behindu · by **Behindu** » 19 Nov 2007 12:21

Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:
Behindu wrote:Although there are some posters who seem prone to assuming everything written on a thread to which they may have contributed is a 'dig' at them...
And....?

And what ?

Dr Hfuhruhurr · by **Dr Hfuhruhurr** » 19 Nov 2007 12:24

No, thats my question to you.
If the idiosyncracies of Schards and his missus frustrate you so much, you really arent going to lose any face by just leaving them be. Otherwise you might just end up on their level.

So they consider digs to personal. And....?

readingbedding · by **readingbedding** » 19 Nov 2007 12:26

Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:No, thats my question to you.
If the idiosyncracies of Schards and his missus frustrate you so much, you really arent going to lose any face by just leaving them be. Otherwise you might just end up on their level.

So they consider digs to personal. And....?

Good point.

Skin · by **Skin** » 19 Nov 2007 12:36

readingbedding wrote:
Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:No, thats my question to you.
If the idiosyncracies of Schards and his missus frustrate you so much, you really arent going to lose any face by just leaving them be. Otherwise you might just end up on their level.

So they consider digs to personal. And....?
Good point.

Not on a thread about stewards its not.

Behindu · by **Behindu** » 19 Nov 2007 12:37

readingbedding wrote:
Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:No, thats my question to you.
If the idiosyncracies of Schards and his missus frustrate you so much, you really arent going to lose any face by just leaving them be. Otherwise you might just end up on their level.

So they consider digs to personal. And....?
Good point.

Indeed, and worthy of reflection.

readingbedding · by **readingbedding** » 19 Nov 2007 12:42

Skin wrote:
readingbedding wrote:
Dr Hfuhruhurr wrote:No, thats my question to you.
If the idiosyncracies of Schards and his missus frustrate you so much, you really arent going to lose any face by just leaving them be. Otherwise you might just end up on their level.

So they consider digs to personal. And....?
Good point.
Not on a thread about stewards its not.

It was about stewards, but I certainly didn't change the subject, I'm just agreeing with what someone else said.

Anyway, I cannot see one mention of stewards on this page, just arguments.

Matt de K · by **Matt de K** » 21 Nov 2007 15:07

I think that some of the moderators on here are stewards

There you go - back on track.....

Skin · by **Skin** » 30 Nov 2007 12:16

I'm looking forward to more comedy capers with the old gang tomorrow. Anyone else?

handbags_harris · by **handbags_harris** » 30 Nov 2007 12:31

Absolutely. It should be interesting at the top of Y25 once again...

Links

Forums

Stewards

Who is online