Terry hasn't committed any crimes (this time, he's past history is very dodgy though). What he has done (which is totally different to anything Gerrard, Rooney, Ferdinand et al have done)is to commit a 'crime' against a team mate. In that respect it doesn ot pale into insignificance at all because the issue directly relates to how England do on the pitch. I think Capello will make the right decision (on the basis that not only is he a pretty switched on guy but he'll have better info than any of us). If he decides that Terry should continue then that will either show Wayne Bridge has been extremely magnanimous or the rest of the squad have all sided with Terry.readingbedding wrote: In regards to Terry's crimes, it pales into significance to what other footballers have done, affairs happen, the people booing, yes even them may have committed an affair sometime.
So let the stupid fans boo, it will all be forgotten if England perform well in South Africa.
You seem to have deleted half your post.readingbedding wrote:Incorrect.
All forgotten about by South Africa.
As you were...
Whatever, who really gives a flying phuck.Sun Tzu wrote:You seem to have deleted half your post.readingbedding wrote:Incorrect.
All forgotten about by South Africa.
As you were...
I'm sure Bridge will have completely forgotten the whole sordid affair in 6 months time !
Given the behaviour of the 'lady' in question it seems this one will run for months, and the former Mrs Terry will be flogging her story to the tabloids too.
You. Clearly.readingbedding wrote:
Whatever, who really gives a flying phuck.
That's fine. No one asked you to boo anyonereadingbedding wrote:I don't really care enough about someone I don't know to boo.
He'll make a choice and whatever it is it will have to be the right one. But terry is damaged goods and we'd be better off with a different captain. I'd take very little pride in seeing him lift the World Cup (which is not the same as not taking pride in England winning it)readingbedding wrote:I just want England to do well.
Capello will make the right choice.
I think your captain needs to be a nailed on starter.Ideal wrote:Gareth Barry.
Pretty much an opening bout on a low quality card isn't it ?papereyes wrote:Under Cappello, I thought he was. Certainly the formation seems to be Barry + one other in midfield rather than a slavish adherence to Gerrard and Lampard.
Anyway, Readingbedding vs Sun Tzu ...
LOL
Is he ?papereyes wrote:Under Cappello, I thought he was. Certainly the formation seems to be Barry + one other in midfield rather than a slavish adherence to Gerrard and Lampard.
LOL
I thought that's what HNA? was forrfcjoe wrote:Or just a street fight, where you talk drunken sh1t to eachother.
Except no one's drunk.Terminal Boardom wrote:I thought that's what HNA? was forrfcjoe wrote:Or just a street fight, where you talk drunken sh1t to eachother.
Victor Meldrew wrote:Reading TBM's earlier post I think he lives in some kind of Captain Marvel world.
Have you actually read what i wrote?..........i've been saying this since the start of the thread, that England captain is more about how they handle themselves off the pitch and the influence they can bring to the players/media/fans - whether this is "right" or "wrong" its what being England captain is about.Victor Meldrew wrote:if we are going to have an England captain (if we really have to have one) the role is as some kind of PR man.
So i'm not living in some kind of "Captain Marvel world" as this is what i said and you very much agree with it. I was basically pointing out what the role of captain was, to whoever it was that asked what a captain actually doesVictor Meldrew wrote:I very much agree that at club level and to some extent at international level the captain can be the link between the players and the manager when airing grievances ether way and getting both sides' views across and therefore an off-the-pitch spokesman has a role to play and indeed some clubs do have a non-playing captain.
Whatever.TBM wrote:Victor Meldrew wrote:Reading TBM's earlier post I think he lives in some kind of Captain Marvel world.Have you actually read what i wrote?..........i've been saying this since the start of the thread, that England captain is more about how they handle themselves off the pitch and the influence they can bring to the players/media/fans - whether this is "right" or "wrong" its what being England captain is about.Victor Meldrew wrote:if we are going to have an England captain (if we really have to have one) the role is as some kind of PR man.
So i'm not living in some kind of "Captain Marvel world" as this is what i said and you very much agree with it. I was basically pointing out what the role of captain was, to whoever it was that asked what a captain actually doesVictor Meldrew wrote:I very much agree that at club level and to some extent at international level the captain can be the link between the players and the manager when airing grievances ether way and getting both sides' views across and therefore an off-the-pitch spokesman has a role to play and indeed some clubs do have a non-playing captain.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], retro royal and 36 guests