I'm with Frimmers, none of those sides are definitely better than SpursRow Z Royal wrote:No.frimmers3 wrote:are they? remains to be seen does it not?Silver Fox wrote:Because they're all better
HTH
But they dont have that European experience - its a totally different game, hence why i think Liverpool are more suited in Europe than Spurs/Man City/Villa etcWax Jacket wrote: I'm with Frimmers, none of those sides are definitely better than Spurs
better than Liverpool for sure, but Spurs are a lot better than Liverpool
reminder for the youngsters...'spurs were the first english club to lift a major european title.and the first to reach a european cup semi final back when you had to win something to be in it,like the championship of your home league.TBM wrote:But they dont have that European experience - its a totally different game, hence why i think Liverpool are more suited in Europe than Spurs/Man City/Villa etcWax Jacket wrote: I'm with Frimmers, none of those sides are definitely better than Spurs
better than Liverpool for sure, but Spurs are a lot better than Liverpool
remind me how many years ago that was?!frimmers3 wrote:reminder for the youngsters...'spurs were the first english club to lift a major european title.and the first to reach a european cup semi final back when you had to win something to be in it,like the championship of your home league.TBM wrote:But they dont have that European experience - its a totally different game, hence why i think Liverpool are more suited in Europe than Spurs/Man City/Villa etcWax Jacket wrote: I'm with Frimmers, none of those sides are definitely better than Spurs
better than Liverpool for sure, but Spurs are a lot better than Liverpool
all those held dear in the hearts of tottenham supporters:their presence still lingers and enthuses.Silver Fox wrote:How many of those succesful Spurs will be playing in the qualifier in August?
obviously,you donated little "thought" to my response.nothing new there.Silver Fox wrote:So, your "point" has no relevance to the qualifier? Thought as much
Does this empty, meaningless nonsense translate as you've got my number?frimmers3 wrote:obviously,you donated little "thought" to my response.nothing new there.Silver Fox wrote:So, your "point" has no relevance to the qualifier? Thought as much
I knew I was right not to vote for you.Wax Jacket wrote:I'm with Frimmers, none of those sides are definitely better than SpursRow Z Royal wrote: No.
better than Liverpool for sure, but Spurs are a lot better than Liverpool
FiNeRaIn wrote:Well done to Harry redknapp, takes a lot of stick from people who call him a crook ( with absolutely no proof)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8624753.stmStranded wrote:What happened to Harry's court date for tax evasion - wasn't that meant to take place in April?
That article's got a really confusing (or just confused) headline:floyd__streete wrote:FiNeRaIn wrote:Well done to Harry redknapp, takes a lot of stick from people who call him a crook ( with absolutely no proof)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8624753.stmStranded wrote:What happened to Harry's court date for tax evasion - wasn't that meant to take place in April?
It sounds like it's the lawyers who are being accused of tax evasion.Football bosses' lawyers accused of tax evasion charges
+1Maguire wrote:LOL@chucking around hyperbole over who finishes fourth. Who gives a shit, quite frankly.
I really don't think the shockwaves from this will echo through English football forever more.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 21 guests