Yes, I think it probably would as there would only have been 3,000 tickets up for grabs.Silver Fox wrote:It wasn't the same product though Schards, had those provisions been in place for Spuds in the league do you think we'd have sold out?
Not many have actually denied that demand has fallen. What most are saying is that the demand is still there for expansion.Schards#2 wrote:The ticket office manager confirming the reduction in demand still being denied by a few flatearthers.Wycombe Royal wrote:What was the point of Schards highlighting that article?
It's all there for those who want to see it.
Schards#2 wrote:The proof of the pudding is in the eating. All of this was on offer for the Spurs match - sufficient capacity, ability to sit together, flexible (reduced) ticket price.Dirk Gently wrote:Let me just pose a couple of questions here for people to consider :
- How many of you would love to bring friends/family etc along to matches if there was sufficient capacity for them and sufficient flexibility for them to sit with you?
- How many of you know people who would come to matches (either with you or separately) if there was capacity and greater (downward) flexibility in ticket prices?
Both of these options are impossible when there is minimal spare capacity.
Actions speak louder than words, there were 2,000 empty seats.

Even that wouldn't be accurate as I'm sure some STH's didn't go but let someone else use it.Skyline wrote:I contacted the TO to see if they could give an idea of what the split was between STH and non-STH on Tuesday, but unfortunately the information is classed as commercially sensitive so they couldn't say.
Riseley wrote:If Schards is middle class then I am a dutchman who spends Saturdays polishing tulips and refining my clog dancing routine.
Regards
Hans T Hatdodishes
I'd rather we didn't let in more away fans than we currently do.West Stand Man wrote:Scenario 1. Directors Meeting.
JM - Nigel, thanks for your detailed business plan showing that we can make a stadium extension viable. Let's look at developing it now. I understand that we will not always fill the larger ground, but there is clearly scope to offer more seats to away fans on occasions like last Saturday (when Man Utd were here), and I can see that your market research has shown that we can sell more than enough tickets to make it worthwhile.
If we hadn't given Spurs the whole away end, the gate would have struggled to reach 20,000 at £20 a head.SpaceCruiser wrote:I'd rather we didn't let in more away fans than we currently do.West Stand Man wrote:Scenario 1. Directors Meeting.
JM - Nigel, thanks for your detailed business plan showing that we can make a stadium extension viable. Let's look at developing it now. I understand that we will not always fill the larger ground, but there is clearly scope to offer more seats to away fans on occasions like last Saturday (when Man Utd were here), and I can see that your market research has shown that we can sell more than enough tickets to make it worthwhile.
Indeed, but would have still been a record gate for a reserve game.Schards#2 wrote:If we hadn't given Spurs the whole away end, the gate would have struggled to reach 20,000 at £20 a head.SpaceCruiser wrote:I'd rather we didn't let in more away fans than we currently do.West Stand Man wrote:Scenario 1. Directors Meeting.
JM - Nigel, thanks for your detailed business plan showing that we can make a stadium extension viable. Let's look at developing it now. I understand that we will not always fill the larger ground, but there is clearly scope to offer more seats to away fans on occasions like last Saturday (when Man Utd were here), and I can see that your market research has shown that we can sell more than enough tickets to make it worthwhile.
Sorry, I just picked a name. Could have been anyone- it was the sentiment that was intended. Perhaps I should have specifically taken Atletico Spizz as the target name (given his thread on the Team board!)Schards#2 wrote:I'd be fascinated to know where you heard I wouldn't be renewing my season ticket.
They should actually be letting less Man Utd fans in next time around due to their persistent standing. However, wonder which counts most, income or safety?SpaceCruiser wrote:I'd rather we didn't let in more away fans than we currently do.West Stand Man wrote:Scenario 1. Directors Meeting.
JM - Nigel, thanks for your detailed business plan showing that we can make a stadium extension viable. Let's look at developing it now. I understand that we will not always fill the larger ground, but there is clearly scope to offer more seats to away fans on occasions like last Saturday (when Man Utd were here), and I can see that your market research has shown that we can sell more than enough tickets to make it worthwhile.
That's down to the FA/Premier League, not RFC.RoyalBlue wrote:They should actually be letting less Man Utd fans in next time around due to their persistent standing. However, wonder which counts most, income or safety?SpaceCruiser wrote:I'd rather we didn't let in more away fans than we currently do.West Stand Man wrote:Scenario 1. Directors Meeting.
JM - Nigel, thanks for your detailed business plan showing that we can make a stadium extension viable. Let's look at developing it now. I understand that we will not always fill the larger ground, but there is clearly scope to offer more seats to away fans on occasions like last Saturday (when Man Utd were here), and I can see that your market research has shown that we can sell more than enough tickets to make it worthwhile.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests