What omissions are there really though, most of those missing are injured.Lower West wrote:Seems to be selecting the match day squad without fear. Easy to fill with established pros. Instead going for the players with character. Who want to pull the shirt on. The ommissions speak volumes about desire and commitment. Knowing the U23's is a definate bonus.Snowflake Royal wrote:You what? Good position? You lot would be baying for blood with our last two results if Clement or Stam had been in charge.Old Man Andrews wrote:
Marshall is accidently now getting himself into a good position. If he is in charge for Middlesbrough and we pick up a win I think he gets it until the end of the season. Really would worry me in the January window though, can't see the owners trusting him with any cash. Might be a case of just doing enough to stay up with what we have and then seeing which managers are available in the summer. Owners can then invest heaviliy then.
Meyler, Aluko, Barrow.Snowflake Royal wrote:What omissions are there really though, most of those missing are injured.Lower West wrote:Seems to be selecting the match day squad without fear. Easy to fill with established pros. Instead going for the players with character. Who want to pull the shirt on. The ommissions speak volumes about desire and commitment. Knowing the U23's is a definate bonus.Snowflake Royal wrote: You what? Good position? You lot would be baying for blood with our last two results if Clement or Stam had been in charge.
Fair enough, largely a continuation of Clement's policy though rather than something new.Lower West wrote:Meyler, Aluko, Barrow.Snowflake Royal wrote:What omissions are there really though, most of those missing are injured.Lower West wrote:
Seems to be selecting the match day squad without fear. Easy to fill with established pros. Instead going for the players with character. Who want to pull the shirt on. The ommissions speak volumes about desire and commitment. Knowing the U23's is a definate bonus.
In a relegation dog fight. You'd normally expect the senior players to be first choices.
Ian Royal came in at 25/1 purely because someone claimed he was a youth coach at the club.genome wrote:For an example of how little money can affect the Reading manager odds, some weirdo started a rumour on Twitter about Leonardo Jardim, got about 10 likes, and now Jardim is fourth favourite at 12/1.
genome wrote:For an example of how little money can affect the Reading manager odds, some weirdo started a rumour on Twitter about Leonardo Jardim, got about 10 likes, and now Jardim is fourth favourite at 12/1.
Er he is.....Ranty McRantface wrote:genome wrote:For an example of how little money can affect the Reading manager odds, some weirdo started a rumour on Twitter about Leonardo Jardim, got about 10 likes, and now Jardim is fourth favourite at 12/1.![]()
There's more chance of us getting Leonardo Di Caprio. I bet whoever started this thought that Jardim was Portuguese too.
And familiar with the ground and its emergency response timesEaststandman wrote:JM is Portuguese!
Venezuelan, but managed in Portugal.Old Man Andrews wrote:Er he is.....Ranty McRantface wrote:genome wrote:For an example of how little money can affect the Reading manager odds, some weirdo started a rumour on Twitter about Leonardo Jardim, got about 10 likes, and now Jardim is fourth favourite at 12/1.![]()
There's more chance of us getting Leonardo Di Caprio. I bet whoever started this thought that Jardim was Portuguese too.
Love seeing ridiculous comments like this.From Despair To Where? wrote:...and the day he becomes Reading manager is the day I walk away from the club.
On the contrary about specific timings he seemed "confused"Uke wrote:And familiar with the ground and its emergency response timesEaststandman wrote:JM is Portuguese!
Old Man Andrews wrote:Love seeing ridiculous comments like this.From Despair To Where? wrote:...and the day he becomes Reading manager is the day I walk away from the club.
I think that's a bit harsh on OMA.From Despair To Where? wrote:He's a lying, arrogant, disruptive pcunt.
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], GURoyal, Jammy Dodger and 239 guests