its the principle that it is intended to be behind closed doors and so club representatives such as Brian will treat it in that way. If it becomes considered 'ok' by the moderators of a site with such a huge readership as HNA? has then it erodes that principle and the club won't be able to approach those session in the same way as they evidently feel they can at the moment.southbank1871 wrote:It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
Why is it that the few people on here who do stick up for STAR sound like they're reading off a prepared script?pea wrote:its the principle that it is intended to be behind closed doors and so club representatives such as Brian will treat it in that way. If it becomes considered 'ok' by the moderators of a site with such a huge readership as HNA? has then it erodes that principle and the club won't be able to approach those session in the same way as they evidently feel they can at the moment.southbank1871 wrote:It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
SummarisedIan Royal wrote:Dear STAR fukwits
you bunch of fuking twats.
FAO the Comms deptOnly one Trevor Morley wrote:Interesting that the club swooped within a couople of hours - obviously HNA is required reading in the comms dept.southbank1871 wrote:It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
ultimately the club embrace the digital age when it suits them but not when it doesnt.pea wrote:its the principle that it is intended to be behind closed doors and so club representatives such as Brian will treat it in that way. If it becomes considered 'ok' by the moderators of a site with such a huge readership as HNA? has then it erodes that principle and the club won't be able to approach those session in the same way as they evidently feel they can at the moment.southbank1871 wrote:It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
their pensions will dramatically increase though!HoneyRoastHoax wrote:they are fooked if we all join as we can out vote them on anything.
STAR ran the event, Brian attended on invite.Simon's Church wrote:It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
Cypry wrote:On a serious note, I hope STAR learn from this, and make it clear to everyone what the etiquette is for the forum.
I was blissfully unaware
You've done nothing wrong, STAR should have informed attendees before the event.Cypry wrote:I know now that I've been a very naughty boy, and I will not do it again!!!!
or moderate it and nicely explain why.Turns8 wrote:My biggest gripe is this whole 'top secret' clique...you represent the fans...so instead of deleting the original thread...why not have the balls to actually post a STAR version up
You'll find it on-line if you know where to look, in fact there are other summaries of the evening too out there (someone was actually tweeting the odd line during the fans forum).Turns8 wrote:Just a shame I didn't copy and paste the original thread as I'd be reposting it as we speak!!!![]()
1. You allow a new member to joinstarliaison wrote:As someone who has a business to run rather than spend all my time on here I apologise that I have not been replying to everyone who is slagging off STAR.
Yes it is run by volunteers (not amateurs but people who have lots of other things to do) and so things do not always happen as fast as they would if it were our job, but it is also successful at what it does. The fact that STAR members were trusted enough by Brian that he was happy to tell us more than anodyne press conferences (a special meaning to those who were there) is because of what we have done over the last 10 years. If that is ruined by one post on here (and that is entirely possible both with the team management and the club management not trusting us in future) then those of you complaining that we are seen to censor the forum will have even less information in the future. Enjoy
If one was to run a private forum and ask in the sign up process not to report the contents, would that prevent someone reporting a post?hobnob wrote:However, they are running a "private" event and don't want it reported on so you have to respect those wishes!
But when the club contacted hobnob they surely weren't acting at STAR's behest?The Rouge wrote:STAR ran the event, Brian attended on invite.Simon's Church wrote:It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
I'll stick up for Bognor here as I've a lot of friends in the towndavis69 wrote:What do you actually get from your star membership??
The chance to sit on a coach with no leg room , full of people looking there going for a lovely trip to Bognor Regis to play some bingo rather than going to a football match.![]()
Moderators: STAR Campaigns, starliaisonSimon's Church wrote:But when the club contacted hobnob they surely weren't acting at STAR's behest?The Rouge wrote:STAR ran the event, Brian attended on invite.Simon's Church wrote:It's a sad day when the club feel the need to strong arm the admin of a supporters' forum because of their own oversight.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 42 guests