Dickie's Spear wrote:Fantastic news !.
Still reckon Brian McDermott would be the man to walk in and restore some order.
Imagine if he had received the support afforded to Jaap but was dumped far too easily
by that fly by night Russian. Especially as Jaap has now blown the budget.
Like oxf*rd did he walk. 'Mutual consent' will just mean we've managed to sell it to him in a way that we don't have to pay quite so much compo.McDermolenko wrote:Lol so it turns out he wasn’t even sacked, he walked.
Surely that means Ulderink is a realistic possibility?
I was only thinking about what resources would be available to the new manager. Brian did have a knack of picking up some good players though at good prices. Anyhow I'm not complaining whoever it is has to be an improvement on Jaap ( this season's Jaap anyway ).handbags_harris wrote:On a footballing level I'd be all for McDermott returning again Dickie, but sadly with half the support at best sceptical the last time around and the tarnishing his reputation took thanks to the inept half-hearted efforts of disinterested lightweights such as Piazon and Vydra I fear it'd be even worse now. Not only do we need someone capable of instantly getting results, we also need someone who will unite the support.
No he didn't walk he was sacked.McDermolenko wrote:Lol so it turns out he wasn’t even sacked, he walked.
Surely that means Ulderink is a realistic possibility?
yeah would be a potentially very good appointment. Villa was obvs a disaster, but before that he was decentUpNorth wrote:Assuming Gourlay rather than Trevenden is in charge of finding the new manager then Di Matteo is going to be high on the list of possible replacements. As mentioned by SCIAG and Royal Rother, these two have worked together successfully at Chelsea. Plus he is available immediately.
Di Matteo always struck me as a poser. Fluked his way to success and was rightly found out at Schalke.UpNorth wrote:Assuming Gourlay rather than Trevenden is in charge of finding the new manager then Di Matteo is going to be high on the list of possible replacements. As mentioned by SCIAG and Royal Rother, these two have worked together successfully at Chelsea. Plus he is available immediately.
He only had 12 games as Villa manager, ridiculous decision to sack him. He only lost four games!Hound wrote:yeah would be a potentially very good appointment. Villa was obvs a disaster, but before that he was decentUpNorth wrote:Assuming Gourlay rather than Trevenden is in charge of finding the new manager then Di Matteo is going to be high on the list of possible replacements. As mentioned by SCIAG and Royal Rother, these two have worked together successfully at Chelsea. Plus he is available immediately.
agreed. I would rather have redknapp then himNewCorkSeth wrote:Di Matteo always struck me as a poser. Fluked his way to success and was rightly found out at Schalke.UpNorth wrote:Assuming Gourlay rather than Trevenden is in charge of finding the new manager then Di Matteo is going to be high on the list of possible replacements. As mentioned by SCIAG and Royal Rother, these two have worked together successfully at Chelsea. Plus he is available immediately.
That is because you are clueless.double d wrote:agreed. I would rather have redknapp then himNewCorkSeth wrote:Di Matteo always struck me as a poser. Fluked his way to success and was rightly found out at Schalke.UpNorth wrote:Assuming Gourlay rather than Trevenden is in charge of finding the new manager then Di Matteo is going to be high on the list of possible replacements. As mentioned by SCIAG and Royal Rother, these two have worked together successfully at Chelsea. Plus he is available immediately.
or we've agreed to continue paying his salary until a new financial fair play window opens allowing us to pay him offwinchester_royal wrote:Like oxf*rd did he walk. 'Mutual consent' will just mean we've managed to sell it to him in a way that we don't have to pay quite so much compo.McDermolenko wrote:Lol so it turns out he wasn’t even sacked, he walked.
Surely that means Ulderink is a realistic possibility?
Wasn't either. 'Mutual consent' so some form of pay off would've been agreed.Old Man Andrews wrote:No he didn't walk he was sacked.McDermolenko wrote:Lol so it turns out he wasn’t even sacked, he walked.
Surely that means Ulderink is a realistic possibility?
He only won that because Ribery and Robben decided to forget how to get a shot on target. Its not like he built that team in any way. He had nothing to lose so let luck, Drogba and the questionable decision to play Bertrand as a winger to lead him to undeserved victory.Old Man Andrews wrote:That is because you are clueless.double d wrote:agreed. I would rather have redknapp then himNewCorkSeth wrote: Di Matteo always struck me as a poser. Fluked his way to success and was rightly found out at Schalke.
Di Matteo is a Champions League winner and more than good enough to manage Reading.
But he won the Champions League yes?NewCorkSeth wrote:He only won that because Ribery and Robben decided to forget how to get a shot on target. Its not like he built that team in any way. He had nothing to lose so let luck, Drogba and the questionable decision to play Bertrand as a winger to lead him to undeserved victory.Old Man Andrews wrote:That is because you are clueless.double d wrote:
agreed. I would rather have redknapp then him
Di Matteo is a Champions League winner and more than good enough to manage Reading.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], yappy and 100 guests