Still no reason why we don't need it. 6 pages and counting.Skin wrote:Still no reason why we need goal music.. 6 pages and counting
Ooops I did it again.
Still no reason why we don't need it. 6 pages and counting.Skin wrote:Still no reason why we need goal music.. 6 pages and counting
Weird analogy. Thousands of people don't visibly enjoy leaving the windscreen wipers on yet thousands can be seen do the dance.Skin wrote:I compare it to leaving your windscreen wipers on after its stopped raining. You put them on to improve your visibility but even though it does no harm leaving them on afterwards you just don't do it.Stranded wrote:It was brought in when it was to try and remedy a peceived lack of atmosphere, people enjoyed it and joined in and as a result it became a permanent fixture.Skin wrote:Still no reason why we need goal music.. 6 pages and counting
It is not needed but people enjoy it and chose to join in with the dance. If they did not, it would be phased out, it's really not that hard a thing to grasp.
Still no reason why it has to be Tom Hark.West Stand Man wrote:Still no reason why we don't need it. 6 pages and counting.Skin wrote:Still no reason why we need goal music.. 6 pages and counting
Ooops I did it again.
If that's how they wish to celebrate a goal then again so what!Winchester Royal wrote:If people want to dance en masse to Tom Hark, they're at the wrong event - We're talking Football matches here, not dancing events..
That and the fact that you love to get up and boogie with the other Upper West prawn sandwich brigadeMr Angry wrote:Playing Tom Hark after a goal winds up the opposition fans; for that reason alone it should stay.
Yep, I noticed that maybe the BTB team were comparing it. I would certainly agree though that the celebrations certainly subsided more quickly and I saw quite a few in the North Stand still doing the dance even without the music.Deadlock wrote:So, no music after Doyle's goal on Saturday. It seemed to me that the crowd celebrations subsided more quickly then they did after Seol's goal.
Or that people were expecting TH to start and weren't quite sure what to do.Deadlock wrote:So, no music after Doyle's goal on Saturday. It seemed to me that the crowd celebrations subsided more quickly then they did after Seol's goal.
how very sad. But probably truePlatypuss wrote:Or that people were expecting TH to start and weren't quite sure what to do.Deadlock wrote:So, no music after Doyle's goal on Saturday. It seemed to me that the crowd celebrations subsided more quickly then they did after Seol's goal.
Exactly.Big Ern wrote:If enough people ignore it when it's played, then I'm sure the club will stop playing it.
More than our first against Boro, which also had no TH? That goal against Boro and Doyle's goal on Saturday and every away goal proves we dont need TH so can we please scrap it!Alan Partridge wrote:I enjoyed the second goal more than any other home goal this season.
I'd love it if TH suddenly started up when the other team were taking a penalty/free kick, etc.Stranded wrote: I could understand it more if the tannoy was playing TH at totally random points in the game
I look forward to seeing the response - something along the lines ofNezhen wrote:Although I tried, I did'nt make it up to the PA announcers box as I wanted to on Saturday to speak to those numbskulls and tell them where they could stick their Tom Hark goal celebration music !
However, I did manage to provide the RFC commerical with a letter to show my utter contempt and disgust with the way in which we, as fans, are being nannied and dictatored to by the club over OUR celebrations.
If I get a reply, I'll fill you in, but it was sheer pleasure to have the opportunity to celebrate Doyles goal without the embarrasing and sickening TH rubbish blaring and drowning out the goal celebrations. Maybe, just maybe they read my letter as one of the suggestions I made was to just try not playing the music to see what a difference it would make.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 45 guests