Wolves - You've Let us down again

513 posts
Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 May 2012 15:06

boycey
SWLR Back to Wolves, i was once told that the old South Bank Terrace was the largest capacity 'end' - bigger than the Kop/ Stretford End etc. Was this right or have I been "let down again".


I thought the Holte end at V Park was the biggest.....


The south bank was the deepest terrace, but wasn't the same depth for its whole width, so the Holte End held more.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 May 2012 15:17

Terminal Boardom
Wimb Cheers for that TB, might well give that book a read.

I guess the irregularity of most stadiums came as they were developed ad-hoc, so you used to end up with 1 odd shaped developed stand etc.

I still can't comprehend what it must have been like standing on such large banks of terracing. Must have been awesome yet frightening at times!


Inglis has written three books on British football grounds and in the first, published in 1983, he described Elm Park as being the least interesting ground in the Football League. For large banks of terracing, they didn't come much bigger than the old East Terrace at The Valley. The picture I posted earlier shows it in its "glory" :shock:


The second of his books was more or less the same as the first, but with Scottish Grounds added.

He also did one about European Football grounds, as well as a slightly odd one featuring big chapters on just a few grounds wordwide, as well as trying to get round all the football grounds in Buenos Aires in one day (there's something like 21 of them).


He also did a book all about Archibald Leitch and his grounds. Sadly old Archie doesn't make the most interesting of subjects himself, but loads of great pictures of how grounds looked in the old days.

It's amazing how much larger grounds look with terracing than with seating, even when both are the same size. Think back to St Andrews for example. That two-side stand curving round from opposite the away end to opposite the main stand doesn't look all that much now, but when it used to be terracing, and the same size, it looked huge.

User avatar
Deadlock
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2948
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:07
Location: There's nothing of value there and the people make very poor slaves.

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Deadlock » 17 May 2012 15:31

Terminal Boardom
Deadlock It's a shame that a stadium with such character as the old Molineux has been replaced by such an identikit construction. Leitch's old Molineux St stand with its seven peaked roofs was unique!

Not sure if that last bit is right unless you are referring to the number of spans then I would probably concur.

No, it was apparently just ignorance :oops:

What became known as the John Ireland Stand (and later the Steve Bull Stand) was built behind Molineux St while the latter was still in use. They then pulled down the old stand and ran out of money, leaving a huge gap to the pitch.
OldMolineux26.jpg
OldMolineux26.jpg (43.06 KiB) Viewed 3478 times

Later they redeveloped the opposite side, leading to this:-

Wouldn't like to be sitting at the wrong side of the South Bank at that time.

Apparently the 1960-61 plans for Molineux were for a capacity of 80,000, with 30,000 seats; all on the original footprint. Before the latest change it was 28,500 all seater on a much bigger area. I guess people were expected to need less room in 1960.

User avatar
Fox Talbot
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1191
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 16:07
Location: Left Back.

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Fox Talbot » 17 May 2012 18:09

There was a plan for 140,000 at Villa Park - Holte End stretching back half way to the moon.

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4399
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Wimb » 18 May 2012 06:56

Were there many ground that had two tiers of terracing? i.e ones where it was overhanging the people below? Suppose large banks made more sense.


Big Foot
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8336
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 15:19
Location: #MagicOfTheCup #RoadToWembley

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Big Foot » 18 May 2012 08:00

Wimb Were there many ground that had two tiers of terracing? i.e ones where it was overhanging the people below? Suppose large banks made more sense.

Think I've read before that Goodison Park had the first 3 tier stand - not sure if it was all terraced though?

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Terminal Boardom » 18 May 2012 08:49

Big Foot
Wimb Were there many ground that had two tiers of terracing? i.e ones where it was overhanging the people below? Suppose large banks made more sense.

Think I've read before that Goodison Park had the first 3 tier stand - not sure if it was all terraced though?


The middle and top tiers were seated and the "paddock" was terraced. Part of the terracing was later taken up with executive boxes.

The only ground I can immediately think of with two tiers of standing was The Dell. Up to the 1970s, they had, at the Archers End, a strange construction referred to as the Chocolate Boxes. These were removed and a larger wedge shaped upper tier built in its place. These were the chocolate boxes:

And this is what they were replaced with:


Do we need a thread specifically for discussing football grounds - past and present?

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4399
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Wimb » 18 May 2012 08:57

Terminal Boardom
Big Foot
Wimb Were there many ground that had two tiers of terracing? i.e ones where it was overhanging the people below? Suppose large banks made more sense.

Think I've read before that Goodison Park had the first 3 tier stand - not sure if it was all terraced though?


The middle and top tiers were seated and the "paddock" was terraced. Part of the terracing was later taken up with executive boxes.

The only ground I can immediately think of with two tiers of standing was The Dell. Up to the 1970s, they had, at the Archers End, a strange construction referred to as the Chocolate Boxes. These were removed and a larger wedge shaped upper tier built in its place. These were the chocolate boxes:

And this is what they were replaced with:


Do we need a thread specifically for discussing football grounds - past and present?


I'd be IN for that, WoLOLves fans probably think we're rabid about their failures :D

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Royal With Cheese » 18 May 2012 12:50

Terminal Boardom
Royal With Cheese
Terminal Boardom Not sure if that last bit is right unless you are referring to the number of spans then I would probably concur. Multi span roofs, whereas not commonplace did, and still do exist. For example, The Valley had a 4 span version; Highbury certainly had one before making way for the art deco style of the East Stand. Both of these stands were designed and built by Humphreys who also built the main stand at Elm Park in 1926. Even Prenton Park had one. And... there is still a 3 multi span version at Brunton Park.

I believe the one at Carlisle is the original Prenton Park stand.


Sorry, but the Prenton Park one was staggered in height and in use until the early 1990s whereas the Brunton Park one was installed in 1965.

I can't recall how I came to that conclusion. I'm sure that the roof was sold and used somewhere else. thought it was Brunton Park.


User avatar
Fox Talbot
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1191
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 16:07
Location: Left Back.

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Fox Talbot » 18 May 2012 15:25

Terminal Boardom
Big Foot
Wimb Were there many ground that had two tiers of terracing? i.e ones where it was overhanging the people below? Suppose large banks made more sense.

Think I've read before that Goodison Park had the first 3 tier stand - not sure if it was all terraced though?


The middle and top tiers were seated and the "paddock" was terraced. Part of the terracing was later taken up with executive boxes.

The only ground I can immediately think of with two tiers of standing was The Dell. Up to the 1970s, they had, at the Archers End, a strange construction referred to as the Chocolate Boxes. These were removed and a larger wedge shaped upper tier built in its place. These were the chocolate boxes:

And this is what they were replaced with:


Do we need a thread specifically for discussing football grounds - past and present?



What about The Shelf at Spurs?

User avatar
frimmers3
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7242
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 20:46
Location: a thorn in the flesh.............

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by frimmers3 » 19 May 2012 19:30

indeed.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 19 May 2012 20:03

The shelf didn't overhang the tier below.

User avatar
frimmers3
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7242
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 20:46
Location: a thorn in the flesh.............

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by frimmers3 » 19 May 2012 20:06

Rev Algenon Stickleback H The shelf didn't overhang the tier below.

it did if you were at the front.


Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 19 May 2012 20:23

frimmers3
Rev Algenon Stickleback H The shelf didn't overhang the tier below.

it did if you were at the front.


No it didn't.

Have you ever actually been to White Hart Lane?


AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25234
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by AthleticoSpizz » 19 May 2012 20:25

^ beautiful

The stereotypical subbuteo ground

User avatar
frimmers3
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7242
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 20:46
Location: a thorn in the flesh.............

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by frimmers3 » 19 May 2012 20:26

if i were in the front of the shelf i would overhang those at the rear below. fact.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 19 May 2012 20:39

frimmers3 if i were in the front of the shelf i would overhang those at the rear below. fact.


No you wouldn't, as the rear of the tier below was further forward than the front of the shelf.

Here's another pic.



There is no "overhang"

User avatar
Avon Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4652
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 10:54
Location: Diggs. Sideline. Touchdown. Unbelievable.

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Avon Royal » 19 May 2012 21:21

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
frimmers3 if i were in the front of the shelf i would overhang those at the rear below. fact.


No you wouldn't, as the rear of the tier below was further forward than the front of the shelf.

Here's another pic.



There is no "overhang"


But there clearly is........

User avatar
Stooper
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1153
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 02:07

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Stooper » 19 May 2012 23:53

Compo's Hat Another view of it. Skip to 1.36

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoEBFwRbFZs


Actually lost what little respect I had for Wigan in that....and I oxf*rd hate Wolves

When Reading have gone down, or sent someone down, there's been commiserations etc.

Fans gathered in front of a line of stewards on their own ground chanting 'We are staying up' is just a bit oxf*rd wrong.

User avatar
Deadlock
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2948
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:07
Location: There's nothing of value there and the people make very poor slaves.

Re: Wolves - You've Let us down again

by Deadlock » 20 May 2012 12:05

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
frimmers3 if i were in the front of the shelf i would overhang those at the rear below. fact.


No you wouldn't, as the rear of the tier below was further forward than the front of the shelf.

Here's another pic.



There is no "overhang"

I think Frimmers might actually believe The Shelf was the top tier.

513 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ascotexgunner, BRO_BOT and 169 guests

It is currently 21 May 2025 20:00