So are you honestly going to tell me that an HD picture is not better than SD?floyd__streete wrote:^ LOL @ HD, the Emperor's New Clothes of television. Do you get free magic beans if you buy an HD tv?
I don't think that Jacqui Oatley is all that bad tbh. Oatley > Drury > Tyldesley.Maguire wrote:Murked myself a bit here as i've just tried to watch NIG v GRE with Radio 5 commentary and it turned out to be a bird
floyd__streete wrote:^ LOL @ HD, the Emperor's New Clothes of television. Do you get free magic beans if you buy an HD tv?
I don't think that Jacqui Oatley is all that bad tbh. Oatley > Drury > Tyldesley.Maguire wrote:Murked myself a bit here as i've just tried to watch NIG v GRE with Radio 5 commentary and it turned out to be a bird
I actually meant for football - I couldn't say too much about other sports, although they do seem knowledgeable in the F1 coverage.ScottishRoyal wrote: However I disagree with Rev A in that this level of journalism is the same across all sports media, it can improve. Take the following examples;
what also grates with me is when you get a world cup match between two lesser nations, particularly on the BBC, they smugly sit around with a "who cares about this shitty game?" attitude as if it's beneath them to even discuss it. They somehow fail to grasp that even though they couldn't give a toss about the match, the people who have tuned in specifically to watch the game, might.As for the crux of the issue discussed, the lack of research, it really is quite embarrassing. In any form of consultancy, research or academic work this is a pre-requisite for good work. If you don't do it you don't get repeat business or a good grade. Sadly ITV is so bad that the BBC don't feel the need to up their game either.
The BBC are so massively smug and self-congratulatory in each and every way, how can their condescending coverage come as surprise as anyone?Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:what also grates with me is when you get a world cup match between two lesser nations, particularly on the BBC, they smugly sit around with a "who cares about this shitty game?" attitude as if it's beneath them to even discuss it. They somehow fail to grasp that even though they couldn't give a toss about the match, the people who have tuned in specifically to watch the game, might.
This is certainly true, but just adds to the argument to include people like O'Neill and Strachan to the 'expert' panel. These guys aren't part of the cosy clique currently on the TV and give their views whether they're popular or not. When someone else talks shit these guys pull them up on it.floyd__streete wrote:The BBC are so massively smug and self-congratulatory in each and every way, how can their condescending coverage come as surprise as anyone?Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:what also grates with me is when you get a world cup match between two lesser nations, particularly on the BBC, they smugly sit around with a "who cares about this shitty game?" attitude as if it's beneath them to even discuss it. They somehow fail to grasp that even though they couldn't give a toss about the match, the people who have tuned in specifically to watch the game, might.
Correct and should we get to the Semi Finals (stop sniggering....it could happenWhore Jackie wrote:BBC have got last 16 and QF I believe.
That'll be interesting - I can't imagine anyone would choose to watch ITV if they have a choice of coverage on both FTA channels.Kitsondinho wrote:Correct and should we get to the Semi Finals (stop sniggering....it could happenWhore Jackie wrote:BBC have got last 16 and QF I believe.![]()
) then BOTH channels show it......as they will the final, whoever is in it.
Maybe Drury doesn't want to play for Ghana6ft Kerplunk wrote:Why is Drury finding it so difficult to understand that by having a Ghanaian father and not having played a senior international for Germany means that he can play for Ghana?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests