I'm saving this one.Thaumagurist* wrote:We need an emoticon for short-sightedness as that's what Schards seems to be.
As long as we can be sure of getting back into the Premier League (*) then possibly - I'm not as certain now as I was when this scheme was first announced, and personally I'm convinced that if we'd been able to build this when first announced and when first planned then the visible vote of confidence in the club's future would have been that little psychological boost to everyone that would have made a difference to where we ended up last season. I have absolutely nothing quantifiable to base that on except for my own feelings and intuition - and, of course, no way of proving it.Thaumagurist* wrote:Yep, absolutely, Dirk, but what about when we do actually get back into the Premiership? Wouldn't it be better to get ready for the next time we're in the Premiership rather than worry about filling the stadium this season?
The bid has to won, first - it's by no means a foregone conclusion.ZacNaloen wrote:If we can get it done in time for the World Cup, with our proximity to London we could host a few games.
Wouldn't that be awesome?
That's a shame, sure they don't count us as the south?Dirk Gently wrote:The bid has to won, first - it's by no means a foregone conclusion.ZacNaloen wrote:If we can get it done in time for the World Cup, with our proximity to London we could host a few games.
Wouldn't that be awesome?
And the bid organisers are looking to have a group in the West/South - or possibly one in each, which would involve money being invested in the Bristol/Exeter/Plymouth area and possibly also the Portsmouth/Southampton area.
I fear we're just a little too close to London to benefit from any WC investment.
Dirk Gently wrote:And the bid organisers are looking to have a group in the West/South - or possibly one in each, which would involve money being invested in the Bristol/Exeter/Plymouth area and possibly also the Portsmouth/Southampton area.
1. I agree with DG on this one. Reading is just too close to London for it to be a realistic choice for any WC games.The 17 Bus wrote:And if the stadium was ready, why would we get any investment??
St Marys is ready tho
Agreed, but you could see a strong case for Plymouth getting in on the act if they could show a demand from the locals. Maybe siting the French/Spanish teams there might do it (with the sea and air links available to both for their fans to come across).Thaumagurist* wrote:Dirk Gently wrote:And the bid organisers are looking to have a group in the West/South - or possibly one in each, which would involve money being invested in the Bristol/Exeter/Plymouth area and possibly also the Portsmouth/Southampton area.at it being in Exeter.
Not quite true. For our first season in the top flight – 2006/07 – it was the Barclays Premiership. It rebranded to the Barclays Premier League for 2007/08.Dirk Gently wrote:There is no such thing as the "Premiership" and there hasn't been for about 10 years since Carling's sponsorship ended.
And that, in a nutshell, is why it's a daft idea.Dirk Gently wrote:I can't believe that this has been dredged up again, and that people are arguing about it even though the whole situation has been changed!
Of course it's a ludicrous idea to increase capacity when we're not in the PL - so what this season's attendances have to do with the argument is completely beyond me!
The fact is that the whole scheme was based upon the assumption that we'd remain in the PL and so have PL-level demand, which includes a number of matches each season which are guaranteed sell-outs and a number of others for which demand would be substantially increased - it also includes PL-level ST sales.
So to use current attendances to argue for or against anything is sheer madness!
Frankly, no. It would only be worth it for week-in/week-out high attendences.Thaumagurist* wrote:Wouldn't it be better to have a bigger stadium for those games to accomodate the obviously bigger demand for tickets?
Thaumagurist* wrote:And what about the possibility of drawing a big team in the FA Cup? Wouldn't it be better to have a bigger stadium for those games to accomodate the obviously bigger demand for tickets?
And also the point that if we're not going to spend Premiership profits on players (Schards' other bete noir), surely the extension is the next best thing?rabidbee wrote:But - to reiterate a point that's been made countless times - isn't that the kind of argument that was made against leaving EP? Aside from the second season at the Mad Stad - when it dropped to around the same level as it had been at EP - our average attendance has risen steadily.
Bradford play at the same ground they have done for donkey's years and developed it in stages, partly as a result of a largish chunk having burned down.....Wimb wrote:I seem to remember Bradford went pretty much bust from investing in a brand new stand on the back of their Premiership survival, now look where they are....
*random aside*
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests