Royal Rother wrote:Or looking after No 207 in the case of the Cook Islands.
That's the key, Blatter just has to say "I'll authorise the money for 2 pitches, wink, wink, nudge, nudge" and when you multiply that across the bulk of the AFC, CAF, OFC and CONCACAF and you've got 140+ member associations where $100,000 can go a long way. £20m is nothin all in modern football and that can secure the support of three quarters of the members, old Sepp can keep it all at arms length and go on about helping grass roots football in developing nations.PieEater wrote:I think that's the point, it's much easier for Blatter to buy the Cook Island vote with a new $50k pitch than other larger countries.
I've never seen the numbers split, they just quote total/regional bribes/investment
I think some of FIFA's support for the "lesser" nations goes further than that. Believe in some cases they'll help cover expenses and insurance for players on international duty e.g. flying players from their clubs to meet up with their internationals squadsFrom Despair To Where? wrote:That's the key, Blatter just has to say "I'll authorise the money for 2 pitches, wink, wink, nudge, nudge" and when you multiply that across the bulk of the AFC, CAF, OFC and CONCACAF and you've got 140+ member associations where $100,000 can go a long way. £20m is nothin all in modern football and that can secure the support of three quarters of the members, old Sepp can keep it all at arms length and go on about helping grass roots football in developing nations.PieEater wrote:I think that's the point, it's much easier for Blatter to buy the Cook Island vote with a new $50k pitch than other larger countries.
I've never seen the numbers split, they just quote total/regional bribes/investment
I think we can safely say that all of UEFA will not support boycotting the Russian world cup.Kitsondinho wrote:2018 seems to be the one they are threatening to boycott. Platini seems fairly keen on driving something through.....but will he get the support for all of UEFA? I'm not so sure.
I dunno, Putin is fairly unpredictable!!Bandini wrote:I think we can safely say that all of UEFA will not support boycotting the Russian world cup.Kitsondinho wrote:2018 seems to be the one they are threatening to boycott. Platini seems fairly keen on driving something through.....but will he get the support for all of UEFA? I'm not so sure.
I realise that, my point was more that the revenue required to curry favour with 140 members is in the sort of range that can be raised by a 30 second advert break during the World Cup final. If you are inclined to "buy" these organisations, it's easy to divert relatively small funds. Clearly for Blatter it's a means by which to limit the influence of the money rich Confederations.Sutekh wrote:I think some of FIFA's support for the "lesser" nations goes further than that. Believe in some cases they'll help cover expenses and insurance for players on international duty e.g. flying players from their clubs to meet up with their internationals squadsFrom Despair To Where? wrote:That's the key, Blatter just has to say "I'll authorise the money for 2 pitches, wink, wink, nudge, nudge" and when you multiply that across the bulk of the AFC, CAF, OFC and CONCACAF and you've got 140+ member associations where $100,000 can go a long way. £20m is nothin all in modern football and that can secure the support of three quarters of the members, old Sepp can keep it all at arms length and go on about helping grass roots football in developing nations.PieEater wrote:I think that's the point, it's much easier for Blatter to buy the Cook Island vote with a new $50k pitch than other larger countries.
I've never seen the numbers split, they just quote total/regional bribes/investment
Them and many others....Pseud O'Nym wrote:Looks like Barclays, Standard Chartered and HSBC were the conduits for the illegal payments. Why does the involvement of British banks not surprise me?
The Industrial & Commercial Bank of China was involved?AthleticoSpizz wrote:No big shocker really, the the worlds biggest banks being used to pigeon hole money into.
A defence line that seems oh so familiar, i.e. everyone was doing it and the lead came from the top. Proving illegal activity shall be difficult and in circumstances such Teflon leaders never seem to be called to account for their actions.ZacNaloen wrote:“Nothing I have done within Fifa has been inconsistent with the international culture of Fifa.”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests