Was anyone sitting down to start with?Tony Le Mesmer wrote:Standing up to applaud a sent off player from the pitch. If you were one of the thousands that did this, I'd love to know the thought process behind it. It's completely beyond me.
That would be the same "unfair advantage" that we get from being able to play him in league games, which nobody at all seems bothered about.WAZZOCK wrote:I'm just struggling to see the significant advantage Reading are perceived to have gained from Yann playing one of his few games of the season for Bournemouth in a 3rd round tie against Birmingham.Winchester Royal wrote:Seems a sensible rule to me.
I'm sure it dates back to the amateur days, when a club would otherwise have been able to borrow players from teams that had already been knocked out.The rule was brought in with good intentions I imagine to stop extreme cases where a club signs a load of decent players with a view to 'buying' the cup.
What the fcuk? It's lovely for you that that you can finally justifiably claim he's playing well, and boy you've had to be patient, but this is just fcuking idiotic.Ian Royal wrote:HRK 9 another good game
Sorry, are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?tmesis wrote:That would be the same "unfair advantage" that we get from being able to play him in league games, which nobody at all seems bothered about.WAZZOCK wrote:I'm just struggling to see the significant advantage Reading are perceived to have gained from Yann playing one of his few games of the season for Bournemouth in a 3rd round tie against Birmingham.Winchester Royal wrote:Seems a sensible rule to me.
Quite who it's unfair to is beyond me.
I'm sure it dates back to the amateur days, when a club would otherwise have been able to borrow players from teams that had already been knocked out.The rule was brought in with good intentions I imagine to stop extreme cases where a club signs a load of decent players with a view to 'buying' the cup.
Things have moved on a bit since then, and it serves absolutely useful purpose now.
Agreeing.WAZZOCK wrote: Sorry, are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?
It wasn't even remotely a clear goalscoring opportunity, so no.Westwood52 wrote:If that crap head Dean thought it was obstruction shouldn't have been a straight red ?
Yeah, don't blame the ref having to make a snap shot decision, blame the defender for putting his arm out and giving him a decision to make. Not that Cooper needs vilifying or anything. It's gutting, but we should take it on the chin and move on.Winston Smith wrote:Disappointed the pen was given but all players dive, including ours. We have had our fair share of dodgy pens and bad officiating over the years (phantom goal anyone?)
I'd just like to see a directive from FIFA or the FA saying that contact alone doesn't make it a penalty, even if the player falls down. They should only give it if, in their opinion, it caused the player to fall.Hendo wrote:I find it hard to liken the phantom goal to a dive or a soft penalty because not one of our players appealed for a goal, the ref just decided to give it.
Which decision was in doubt then ?tidus_mi2 wrote:All yesterday showed that we need to get with the times and bring in the use of video replays to aid decisions, thankfully it seems Infantino may well be going that way.
The penalty...Longhorn1970 wrote:Which decision was in doubt then ?tidus_mi2 wrote:All yesterday showed that we need to get with the times and bring in the use of video replays to aid decisions, thankfully it seems Infantino may well be going that way.
If it was Vydra who was taken out in their box it would be a pen right ? ..tidus_mi2 wrote:The penalty...Longhorn1970 wrote:Which decision was in doubt then ?tidus_mi2 wrote:All yesterday showed that we need to get with the times and bring in the use of video replays to aid decisions, thankfully it seems Infantino may well be going that way.
It doesn't even matter whether people think it was a penalty or not, it's the fact that it is a key decision that gave Crystal Palace a goal scoring opportunity and reduced us to 10 men, the game is stopped anyway so any decision as crucial as that should be reviewed.
leon wrote:No they didn't have a tonne of chances. And frankly even if they had after 85 mins if they hadn't scored after all of those they didn't deserve it. Shit penalty decided it.CountryRoyal wrote:It's been a long time since I've been that angry at the football.
First thing is first it was a fair result, make no mistake Palace deserved to win. Al-Habsi made so many incredible saves and they had a tonne of chances and opportunities which should have seen the game dead and buried at half time.
HOWEVER... The way we went out was so unjust. The softest, most bullshit penalty that has ever been given, even more so considering the circumstances. I don't like to blame referees but Mike Dean never had a foothold in the game, was shocking throughout.
That was the most disappointing thing, the other was the fact that beyond Al-Habsi we were pretty oxf*rd shit and deserved to lose. Palace were the best draw to get, were there for the taking and represented our best chance of getting to Wembley, and everyone knew it. It was nervy from us and we were, on many occasions "almost there", unfortunately we fluffed our lines and weren't good enough.
That was probably our most defensive set up and we were carved open time and time again. Ever since the 30th minute (probably less) we were crying out for 2 up top. So much wasted possession in the opposition third because there was no support.
I truly fcuking hate Palace now. For all the "palace fans are great" bollocks they were shit. Sang once all game before they scored and quite frankly they don't deserve it. I truly fcuking hope they go down the shitty pcunty faggoty "ultra" wvnkers.
Absolutey gutted tonight, truly gutted purely because of how we lost.
Oh well, onto next season.
Please stop following me about the board Kes. I've told you before I'm not gay and I'm really not interested.No Fixed Abode wrote:leon wrote:No they didn't have a tonne of chances. And frankly even if they had after 85 mins if they hadn't scored after all of those they didn't deserve it. Shit penalty decided it.CountryRoyal wrote:It's been a long time since I've been that angry at the football.
First thing is first it was a fair result, make no mistake Palace deserved to win. Al-Habsi made so many incredible saves and they had a tonne of chances and opportunities which should have seen the game dead and buried at half time.
HOWEVER... The way we went out was so unjust. The softest, most bullshit penalty that has ever been given, even more so considering the circumstances. I don't like to blame referees but Mike Dean never had a foothold in the game, was shocking throughout.
That was the most disappointing thing, the other was the fact that beyond Al-Habsi we were pretty oxf*rd shit and deserved to lose. Palace were the best draw to get, were there for the taking and represented our best chance of getting to Wembley, and everyone knew it. It was nervy from us and we were, on many occasions "almost there", unfortunately we fluffed our lines and weren't good enough.
That was probably our most defensive set up and we were carved open time and time again. Ever since the 30th minute (probably less) we were crying out for 2 up top. So much wasted possession in the opposition third because there was no support.
I truly fcuking hate Palace now. For all the "palace fans are great" bollocks they were shit. Sang once all game before they scored and quite frankly they don't deserve it. I truly fcuking hope they go down the shitty pcunty faggoty "ultra" wvnkers.
Absolutey gutted tonight, truly gutted purely because of how we lost.
Oh well, onto next season.![]()
Have you not seen the stats or game? Another thread where Leon embarrasses himself with this and other frothing at the mouth replies.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 478 guests