Obviously after one game.tidus_mi2 wrote:So are Luton dark horses this season or are Peterborough shit?
PAUNO OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SouthDownsRoyal wrote:You can’t keep this reading side down!
Top shelf Pauno
Pauno IN
3-0 is a big scoreline though so it is an early indicator.windermereROYAL wrote:Obviously after one game.tidus_mi2 wrote:So are Luton dark horses this season or are Peterborough shit?
are you now Pauno OUT?genome wrote:3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
It's our fault for overspending for nigh on a decade and doing the bare minimum to get wages down.RoyalBlue wrote:It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.Brogue wrote:RoyalBlue wrote:
Agreed. They must be drinking/smoking something very strong. If they want to go for the culprits they should be targeting the EFL for leaving us in a situation where we can only realistically name 5 subs.Yes it’s the EFL’s fault we broke the rules.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
Auto post - Bowen would get pelters for that.genome wrote:3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
Grow up.Simmops wrote:are you now Pauno OUT?genome wrote:3-2 down, 5 minutes to go, take off a striker and bring on a defender
Classic Pauno sub
Maybe, but as has been pointed out by others, effectively forcing clubs to release their most valuable assets for pretty much bugger all, thus significantly worsening their financial situation, demonstrates the stupidity of the current EFL approach to FFP. And can the EFL really be excused for sitting on the fence, not reaching/communicating decisions/punishments and leaving clubs in a dangerous damaging limbo?Snowflake Royal wrote:It's our fault for overspending for nigh on a decade and doing the bare minimum to get wages down.RoyalBlue wrote:It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.Brogue wrote:
Yes it’s the EFL’s fault we broke the rules.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
It's our fault for giving cup and league debuts to players we didn't want as part of our senior squad knowing the financial position we were in and the rules around them.
It's our fault for handing out long contracts to punts we decide we don't want, can't get rid of and refuse to use.
I think the men’s game is too complicated for you. You should stick to the women’s’ game…RoyalBlue wrote:Maybe, but as has been pointed out by others, effectively forcing clubs to release their most valuable assets for pretty much bugger all, thus significantly worsening their financial situation, demonstrates the stupidity of the current EFL approach to FFP. And can the EFL really be excused for sitting on the fence, not reaching/communicating decisions/punishments and leaving clubs in a dangerous damaging limbo?Snowflake Royal wrote:It's our fault for overspending for nigh on a decade and doing the bare minimum to get wages down.RoyalBlue wrote:
It's the EFL's fault for creating ridiculous rules and then sitting on the fence and not giving us any proper form of definitive decision/ruling. It's the EFL's fault that the application of the rules and consequential sanctions appears to be so inconsistent.
And our current situation very certainly isn't the manager's fault which was the main point being made.
It's our fault for giving cup and league debuts to players we didn't want as part of our senior squad knowing the financial position we were in and the rules around them.
It's our fault for handing out long contracts to punts we decide we don't want, can't get rid of and refuse to use.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 141 guests