Based on what exactly?CountryRoyal wrote:Barnsley therefore favorites for the drop but they've probably got a lot more fight in then us.
Based on what exactly?CountryRoyal wrote:Barnsley therefore favorites for the drop but they've probably got a lot more fight in then us.
Less talented players. Northern.Silver Fox wrote:Based on what exactly?CountryRoyal wrote:Barnsley therefore favorites for the drop but they've probably got a lot more fight in then us.
It’s the sort of game we need. Leeds in mid table with very little to play for and in poor form. The atmosphere will be much livelier on Saturday. That will help. We have a very decent record against them (much like Derby)tidus_mi2 wrote:On a more related to us note, Wolves are making Leeds look like complete pushovers, hopefully that will be positive for us when we play Leeds at the weekend, not forgetting they've only won once since Boxing Day.
If only they'd sold a dozen more piestidus_mi2 wrote:... and they lost £23 ...
Don't know about Wolves' position but given the investment gets spread over the length of the contract, I've been wondering if our contract extensions this season were to lighten up our FFP position a little. Or have I got that totally wrong?tidus_mi2 wrote: ... are they really going to stay within the FFP figure?
I think that would only apply if they were signings. ie Aluko's fee would be spread over the 4 (Horsham Royal wrote:If only they'd sold a dozen more piestidus_mi2 wrote:... and they lost £23 ...
Don't know about Wolves' position but given the investment gets spread over the length of the contract, I've been wondering if our contract extensions this season were to lighten up our FFP position a little. Or have I got that totally wrong?tidus_mi2 wrote: ... are they really going to stay within the FFP figure?
Yes, that's true. Essentially, apart from wages, a player is "free" in FFP terms if he keeps extending a contract. the only case where the FFP would be affected by a contract extension is if there was an "option to extend" built into the original contract - as I understand it, whether FFP per year cost is spread over the initial length or the "extended length" boils down to who has control over the extension - the player or the club.Hound wrote:I think that would only apply if they were signings. ie Aluko's fee would be spread over the 4 ( : ( ) years of his contractHorsham Royal wrote:If only they'd sold a dozen more piestidus_mi2 wrote:... and they lost £23 ...
Don't know about Wolves' position but given the investment gets spread over the length of the contract, I've been wondering if our contract extensions this season were to lighten up our FFP position a little. Or have I got that totally wrong?tidus_mi2 wrote: ... are they really going to stay within the FFP figure?
I think they are fairly safe so my guess is they will wait until the end of the season and then go after Mick McCarthy who is out of contract in June. They want him anyway and won't have to pay compo if they wait.John Smith wrote:Sheffield Wednesday since Carvahal's departure:
- lost the last 5 games
- taken just 7 points from the last possible 30
- new all time low record for consecutive games lost
- host Bolton on Saturday.
Should they not pick up maximum points vs. Bolton, does Luhukay go?
I just don't trust that moustache at all, deeply questionable.genome wrote:I always think Luhukay looks like a Bond villain
I think you're probably right as I've heard the same thing. I think they are now where they belong and I'm glad to see them in the mire because they have ideas above their station.Old Man Andrews wrote:I think they are fairly safe so my guess is they will wait until the end of the season and then go after Mick McCarthy who is out of contract in June. They want him anyway and won't have to pay compo if they wait.John Smith wrote:Sheffield Wednesday since Carvahal's departure:
- lost the last 5 games
- taken just 7 points from the last possible 30
- new all time low record for consecutive games lost
- host Bolton on Saturday.
Should they not pick up maximum points vs. Bolton, does Luhukay go?
Tell you what, why don't you create a poll on Owls.com?John Smith wrote:I think you're probably right as I've heard the same thing. I think they are now where they belong and I'm glad to see them in the mire because they have ideas above their station.Old Man Andrews wrote:I think they are fairly safe so my guess is they will wait until the end of the season and then go after Mick McCarthy who is out of contract in June. They want him anyway and won't have to pay compo if they wait.John Smith wrote:Sheffield Wednesday since Carvahal's departure:
- lost the last 5 games
- taken just 7 points from the last possible 30
- new all time low record for consecutive games lost
- host Bolton on Saturday.
Should they not pick up maximum points vs. Bolton, does Luhukay go?
IF they lose against Bolton, the following game is away to Leeds United. They then play PNE at home.
If they lose all three - does Luhukay go?
Not FFP but interesting*muirinho wrote:Yes, that's true. Essentially, apart from wages, a player is "free" in FFP terms if he keeps extending a contract. the only case where the FFP would be affected by a contract extension is if there was an "option to extend" built into the original contract - as I understand it, whether FFP per year cost is spread over the initial length or the "extended length" boils down to who has control over the extension - the player or the club.Hound wrote:I think that would only apply if they were signings. ie Aluko's fee would be spread over the 4 ( : ( ) years of his contractHorsham Royal wrote:If only they'd sold a dozen more pies
Don't know about Wolves' position but given the investment gets spread over the length of the contract, I've been wondering if our contract extensions this season were to lighten up our FFP position a little. Or have I got that totally wrong?
It's worth noting of course that actual losses and FFP losses aren't the same thing. If some of those losses arise from subsidising an academy, etc, they won't count.
If they lose and we win on Saturday, they will be 19th. Will they still be fairly safe?Old Man Andrews wrote:I think they are fairly safe so my guess is they will wait until the end of the season and then go after Mick McCarthy who is out of contract in June. They want him anyway and won't have to pay compo if they wait.John Smith wrote:Sheffield Wednesday since Carvahal's departure:
- lost the last 5 games
- taken just 7 points from the last possible 30
- new all time low record for consecutive games lost
- host Bolton on Saturday.
Should they not pick up maximum points vs. Bolton, does Luhukay go?
I'm 90% sure they will be. However they still have Bolton, Sunderland, Hull and us to play. Lose all of them and they're in huge troubleStranded wrote: If they [Sheffield Wednesday] lose and we win on Saturday, they will be 19th. Will they still be fairly safe?
Could be a massive game when we visit there next month, so hopefully they keep hold of Luhukay.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 46 guests