Good stats that.genome wrote:Since Peterborough away, we've won 4, drawn 2, lost 3.
1.5 PPG. If Ince continues or betters that over the last 6 games I think he's earned a chance.
Good stats that.genome wrote:Since Peterborough away, we've won 4, drawn 2, lost 3.
1.5 PPG. If Ince continues or betters that over the last 6 games I think he's earned a chance.
I can think of one. His first name was Brian. No. not Clough.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He's done well thus far, however the job isn't done yet. Certainly think he's in with a shout of being the manager full time, I just don't think interim managers that earn a permanent position ever end up being wholly successful really. Sometimes it's not always unsuccessful, but it seems to be more bad than good. Ironically, in the PL era, the 3rd best manager in the entire league ever is "No manager", meaning interims or a club without a permanent manager in charge.
I'll still stick with my thoughts of we should shake hands at the end of the season and say job well done should we get over the line, which is looking more and more likely. But I can completely understand the argument towards giving him the job where (at the moment) he has probably earned more opportunity in the role and it may give us more stability as well.
Well yeah that's actually a pretty big argument against the claim really, fair play!The Royal Forester wrote:I can think of one. His first name was Brian. No. not Clough.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He's done well thus far, however the job isn't done yet. Certainly think he's in with a shout of being the manager full time, I just don't think interim managers that earn a permanent position ever end up being wholly successful really. Sometimes it's not always unsuccessful, but it seems to be more bad than good. Ironically, in the PL era, the 3rd best manager in the entire league ever is "No manager", meaning interims or a club without a permanent manager in charge.
I'll still stick with my thoughts of we should shake hands at the end of the season and say job well done should we get over the line, which is looking more and more likely. But I can completely understand the argument towards giving him the job where (at the moment) he has probably earned more opportunity in the role and it may give us more stability as well.
The fact that only one name readily sprang to my mind, does in fact support your original thoughts, though.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Well yeah that's actually a pretty big argument against the claim really, fair play!The Royal Forester wrote:I can think of one. His first name was Brian. No. not Clough.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He's done well thus far, however the job isn't done yet. Certainly think he's in with a shout of being the manager full time, I just don't think interim managers that earn a permanent position ever end up being wholly successful really. Sometimes it's not always unsuccessful, but it seems to be more bad than good. Ironically, in the PL era, the 3rd best manager in the entire league ever is "No manager", meaning interims or a club without a permanent manager in charge.
I'll still stick with my thoughts of we should shake hands at the end of the season and say job well done should we get over the line, which is looking more and more likely. But I can completely understand the argument towards giving him the job where (at the moment) he has probably earned more opportunity in the role and it may give us more stability as well.![]()
I was more talking in general terms though. Having said that, Pardew wasn't too bad either. Maybe ourselves, as a club, are more against the grain. But then I suppose you look at other interims like Scott Marshall, Martin Kuhl and McDermott's second spell in charge and it begins to even out some more.
I guess the biggest difference here, from a Reading PoV at least, is that normally an interim/caretaker is just someone internally who can step up for a bit. With Ince, we've gone out and approached him to take over for the interim. Now he's done well, he's not "tainted" in the sense he's been at the club longer term and been part of the issues.The Royal Forester wrote:The fact that only one name readily sprang to my mind, does in fact support your original thoughts, though.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Well yeah that's actually a pretty big argument against the claim really, fair play!The Royal Forester wrote: I can think of one. His first name was Brian. No. not Clough.![]()
I was more talking in general terms though. Having said that, Pardew wasn't too bad either. Maybe ourselves, as a club, are more against the grain. But then I suppose you look at other interims like Scott Marshall, Martin Kuhl and McDermott's second spell in charge and it begins to even out some more.
You can only assume that discussions with candidates would be happening at this stage and during the off-season to discuss who they'd want to stay and if they could keep players on board. I don't doubt the club are also having discussions with our current players' agents around signing new contracts to see if that is a possibility, it definitely won't just be a decision that happens on the day, you'd expect discussions would be ongoing somewhat now as interest will be gathering from other clubs as well.Stranded wrote:I guess the biggest difference here, from a Reading PoV at least, is that normally an interim/caretaker is just someone internally who can step up for a bit. With Ince, we've gone out and approached him to take over for the interim. Now he's done well, he's not "tainted" in the sense he's been at the club longer term and been part of the issues.The Royal Forester wrote:The fact that only one name readily sprang to my mind, does in fact support your original thoughts, though.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:
Well yeah that's actually a pretty big argument against the claim really, fair play!![]()
I was more talking in general terms though. Having said that, Pardew wasn't too bad either. Maybe ourselves, as a club, are more against the grain. But then I suppose you look at other interims like Scott Marshall, Martin Kuhl and McDermott's second spell in charge and it begins to even out some more.
So cleaning house a bit and then being able to rebuild as he wants could be positive esp as he may have been able to persuade some players to stay - whereas any new manager will need to hit the ground running in getting any new deals signed and likely having to make 10 or 15 new signings, ideally by early July to have a decent size squad to prepare for opening weekend at the end of July.
Brian McDermottYorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He's done well thus far, however the job isn't done yet. Certainly think he's in with a shout of being the manager full time, I just don't think interim managers that earn a permanent position ever end up being wholly successful really. Sometimes it's not always unsuccessful, but it seems to be more bad than good. Ironically, in the PL era, the 3rd best manager in the entire league ever is "No manager", meaning interims or a club without a permanent manager in charge.
I'll still stick with my thoughts of we should shake hands at the end of the season and say job well done should we get over the line, which is looking more and more likely. But I can completely understand the argument towards giving him the job where (at the moment) he has probably earned more opportunity in the role and it may give us more stability as well.
This was already established above.Snowflake Royal wrote:Brian McDermottYorkshireRoyal99 wrote:He's done well thus far, however the job isn't done yet. Certainly think he's in with a shout of being the manager full time, I just don't think interim managers that earn a permanent position ever end up being wholly successful really. Sometimes it's not always unsuccessful, but it seems to be more bad than good. Ironically, in the PL era, the 3rd best manager in the entire league ever is "No manager", meaning interims or a club without a permanent manager in charge.
I'll still stick with my thoughts of we should shake hands at the end of the season and say job well done should we get over the line, which is looking more and more likely. But I can completely understand the argument towards giving him the job where (at the moment) he has probably earned more opportunity in the role and it may give us more stability as well.
/end
100pcNathStPaul wrote:He hasn't. He just had a very low bar set for him by the previous manager, it would have been hard to have done worse. We have a squad who based on ability alone should be at least midtable so lets not get over excited when it comes to Ince. He has done the minimum that was asked of him which is to keep us up.paultheroyal wrote:Ince has done a fantastic job.
Not necessarily, as discussed on here (or another thread), these players may be more willing to sign a new deal with the club if we stay in the league and Ince is in charge. Players always want to be secure at a club and I'd anticipate that many like Rino, Holmes, Hoilett etc may be likely to sign new deals for a certain length of time, especially if they are settled at the club and that the club is in the division they want to play in.Weymouth Royal wrote:I like Ince's attitude, and the players clearly listen to him. The dilemma is that next season most of this squad will be gone, many of the replacements will likely be kids coming in from the academy, free transfers and loans. The job next season will be far harder than this seasons. For me, in that situation, I'd rather Brian McDermott had the job. But it'll be a hell of a task for whom ever comes in.
Wrexham won again today, already a proven winner Parky would jump at the chance.Blackbag wrote:Give him the job if we’d won today he’d be manager of the month no question
Correct.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:100pcNathStPaul wrote:He hasn't. He just had a very low bar set for him by the previous manager, it would have been hard to have done worse. We have a squad who based on ability alone should be at least midtable so lets not get over excited when it comes to Ince. He has done the minimum that was asked of him which is to keep us up.paultheroyal wrote:Ince has done a fantastic job.
just about scabbed a win against the 19th placed team in the ‘Non-League’ with a 95th minute penalty.karbota wrote:Wrexham won again today, already a proven winner Parky would jump at the chance.Blackbag wrote:Give him the job if we’d won today he’d be manager of the month no question
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Clyde1998, Fox Talbot, Google [Bot], Jammy Dodger, Semrush [Bot], Sutekh and 158 guests