I disagree. Liverpool's season should be written off in my opinion. They should've brought in Suarez for the £23million they paid which is a fairer sum than that paid for Carroll, and kept the £50million in the bank ready for the summer.Stranded wrote:Does anyone seriously think Liverpool would have spent £35m on Carroll if they hadn't just pocketed £50m? The price tag is pretty irrelevant in this case.
I think that everyone agrees that Liverpool have paid over the odds/taken a risk. Lets say that they have paid £15M-20M too much. In the mad world of those trying to break (back) into the top four that isn't staggering and the money was there to spend. Any other purchase was likely to carry its own risks and would definitely be overpriced. Doing nothing would have carried its own risks.Thomas L'Heureux wrote:I disagree. Liverpool's season should be written off in my opinion. They should've brought in Suarez for the £23million they paid which is a fairer sum than that paid for Carroll, and kept the £50million in the bank ready for the summer.Stranded wrote:Does anyone seriously think Liverpool would have spent £35m on Carroll if they hadn't just pocketed £50m? The price tag is pretty irrelevant in this case.
With £50million in what would be more of a buyer's market they could've replaced Torres for cheaper leaving them enough funds to bring in another player of decent ability.
Newcastle knew how desperate they were and got the most they could for Carroll, but I'm pretty sure he would not have gone for more than £20million during July or August.
^This. BBC said this morning that it was only admin at Blackpool's end that stopped the deal going through. Had Redknapp not tried to be cute, he might have got the player.paultheroyal wrote:Someone needs to tell him though that transfer day is not like EBay!! Put in a last minute bis and hope!!
I wonder how much of that was deliberate on Blackpool's behalf ?cmonurz wrote:^This. BBC said this morning that it was only admin at Blackpool's end that stopped the deal going through. Had Redknapp not tried to be cute, he might have got the player.paultheroyal wrote:Someone needs to tell him though that transfer day is not like EBay!! Put in a last minute bis and hope!!
I take it that you're not off to Bolton any time soon then. Or you're black?prostak wrote:People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
But only if he could perform like Steve Sidwell did for us after he refused a new contract. I personally doubt that.Ideal wrote:Adam should shut the fcuk up. He was happy enough to sign the contract, then he should be prepared to see it through.
Blackpool clearly in the right, they can demand whatever they want for their player who is under contract for another 18 months.
In my opinion they should just keep him until the contract expires. He is clearly more valuable to them than what they would recoup through a sale.
If relegation would cost them £30M-40M, then that's what he's worth to them.
So that's not Sturridge then I assume?prostak wrote:People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
No, it's obviously Bill CosbySilver Fox wrote:So that's not Sturridge then I assume?prostak wrote:People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
Well, it's not is it. Please though, who is it?prostak wrote:No, it's obviously Bill CosbySilver Fox wrote:So that's not Sturridge then I assume?prostak wrote:People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
That they have more money than sense. We know that, they are a football club.Ideal wrote:Even if he never plays for them again, they should make him stay until the end of his contract just to prove a point.Royal With Cheese wrote:But only if he could perform like Steve Sidwell did for us after he refused a new contract. I personally doubt that.
Its WellbeckSilver Fox wrote:So that's not Sturridge then I assume?prostak wrote:People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...

Users browsing this forum: Fluff, Google [Bot] and 28 guests