Its only 3-1 ffsCountryRoyal wrote:No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.Zip wrote:This is embarrassing
Hardly embarrassing or a massive defeat. Lopsided yeah, but of course it is.
Its only 3-1 ffsCountryRoyal wrote:No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.Zip wrote:This is embarrassing
We're losing by 2 goals you massive melt.CountryRoyal wrote:We played 2 strikers but they definitely weren’t “up top”.Tails wrote:100% correct.Hound wrote:
We had ambition - 2 up top etc. can’t magic up possession in decent areas. They are just far far better than us
Formation was basically 5-6-0 and still got hammered. Pathetic.
By trying to have the ball?Hound wrote:How do we go for it if we don’t have the ball?CountryRoyal wrote:No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.Zip wrote:This is embarrassing
There seems to be a superfluous "r" in your user nameCountryRoyal wrote:We played 2 strikers but they definitely weren’t “up top”.Tails wrote:100% correct.Hound wrote:
We had ambition - 2 up top etc. can’t magic up possession in decent areas. They are just far far better than us
Formation was basically 5-6-0 and still got hammered. Pathetic.
That makes a lot sense.Jinx wrote:There seems to be a superfluous "r" in your user nameCountryRoyal wrote:We played 2 strikers but they definitely weren’t “up top”.Tails wrote:
100% correct.
Formation was basically 5-6-0 and still got hammered. Pathetic.
Think he took a poor touch so delayed the shot, then fell over.Hound wrote:Wtf was that from Fornah?
We’ve been better with 10
Just naming 2 strikers isn’t “going for it” when they’re seemingly played in midfield. “Going for it” would involve creating more than 2 shots in 45 minutes.Hound wrote:How do we go for it if we don’t have the ball?CountryRoyal wrote:No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.Zip wrote:This is embarrassing
+10000000000000Sutekh wrote:Just naming 2 strikers isn’t “going for it” when they’re seemingly played in midfield. “Going for it” would involve creating more than 2 shots in 45 minutes.Hound wrote:How do we go for it if we don’t have the ball?CountryRoyal wrote:
No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.
So we didn't create many chances against Stoke, Rotherham, Sheff utd etc - how do you propose we should have done it at Old trafford?Sutekh wrote:Just naming 2 strikers isn’t “going for it” when they’re seemingly played in midfield. “Going for it” would involve creating more than 2 shots in 45 minutes.Hound wrote:How do we go for it if we don’t have the ball?CountryRoyal wrote:
No complaints getting hammered, we’ve really gone for it and tried to win the game. These things happen.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], biscuitman26, Google Adsense [Bot], zaskar and 278 guests