they are really poor at home recently so i am pretty confident
Yeah, f*cking Reading. Who do they think they are criticising other teams' support?Row Z Royal wrote:The most ironic thread in Hobnob history.
I would be happy with that but why settle for just 8 ?Elliott wrote:Early prediction:
Saints 0 - 8 Royals
Doyle, Nhunt, Shunt, Doyle, Nhunt, Kebe, Cisse, Doyle!
another early prediction: Not that ^^^^Elliott wrote:Early prediction:
Saints 0 - 8 Royals
Doyle, Nhunt, Shunt, Doyle, Nhunt, Kebe, Cisse, Doyle!
And what is our average for this season?rg6royal wrote:Only 19,000 odd there today
Granted.. its not far off that. However in percentage terms of how many seats are filled compared to the grounds capacity..JC wrote:And what is our average for this season?rg6royal wrote:Only 19,000 odd there today
Still don't see why they haven't given us some more tickets - we could and would have sold them and it's "guaranteed revenue" for them.Saints website wrote:certainly this game.....will not only bring some much needed revenue into the club, but also give supporters the pleasurable experience of seeing a St Mary's with many more supporters than empty seats."
maybe the want the 3 points miore than the money and feel that giving us a bigger crowd to get behind our team would tunr it into more of an advantage for usT.R.O.L.I. wrote:Still don't see why they haven't given us some more tickets - we could and would have sold them and it's "guaranteed revenue" for them.Saints website wrote:certainly this game.....will not only bring some much needed revenue into the club, but also give supporters the pleasurable experience of seeing a St Mary's with many more supporters than empty seats."
And I bet we would get more than 19k for a top of the table big game clash at home. Even if it was on sky and an early kick off.bb0118 wrote:Granted.. its not far off that. However in percentage terms of how many seats are filled compared to the grounds capacity..JC wrote:And what is our average for this season?rg6royal wrote:Only 19,000 odd there today
Reading's so far average is 19,077 from a 24,200 capacity. This is 78.8%
Birmingham's is 18,744 from a 30,009 capacity. This is 62.4%
For what its worth, Norwich are top with an average 93.1% full for every home game
Lowest is Shef Wednesday with 48.1%
...and Reading was the second biggest city in the country.Ian Royal wrote: And I bet we would get more than 19k for a top of the table big game clash at home. Even if it was on sky and an early kick off.
Size of Reading has little to do with it.Rev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:...and Reading was the second biggest city in the country.Ian Royal wrote: And I bet we would get more than 19k for a top of the table big game clash at home. Even if it was on sky and an early kick off.
It was £30 for us to get in, so maybe they've kept premier league prices and a lot of fans have told them to get stuffed after two relegations in 3 seasons.
bb0118 wrote:Granted.. its not far off that. However in percentage terms of how many seats are filled compared to the grounds capacity..JC wrote:And what is our average for this season?rg6royal wrote:Only 19,000 odd there today
Reading's so far average is 19,077 from a 24,200 capacity. This is 78.8%
Birmingham's is 18,744 from a 30,009 capacity. This is 62.4%
For what its worth, Norwich are top with an average 93.1% full for every home game
Lowest is Shef Wednesday with 48.1%
Which would still be preferable to having 38,000 seats.Sun Tzu wrote:We could have built a ground with one deckchair on the half way line and claimed 100% sell outs every week.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests