Probably not, no.3points wrote:Paul Hurst to Ipswich could be a decent move for the Tractor Boys. Done well so far on l8mited budgets. Dark horse for next season maybe?
Well unlike the bore fest Clement will serve up next season, Potter has shown he's not afraid to play attacking football. Swansea have some decent players that can play that style if they can keep them. The fact Potter has started a team from scratch and won domestic trophies within 6 years of that club starting up, and had success in Europe including beating Arsenal at the Emirates, suggests to me he has fresh ideas and and a good footballing brain.paultheroyal wrote:Based on what...?Ascotexgunner wrote:If Swansea get Graham Potter I'll be highly jealous. Thought he was perfect for us and just what we were looking for.
I'll lump a load of dosh they'll go back up with him in charge. He's a good fit for that club.
Attacking football apparentlySimon's Church wrote:Not seen quite as much of ostersunds fk over the last few years as I would have liked so don't know too much about this guy.
What kind of football will he get Swansea playing?
Its not so much about the attacking, its fearless element as well. Our players look like rabbits in headlights when their on the ball most of the time. They can't wait to get rid of it.paultheroyal wrote:Attacking football apparentlySimon's Church wrote:Not seen quite as much of ostersunds fk over the last few years as I would have liked so don't know too much about this guy.
What kind of football will he get Swansea playing?
I think that’s fairly symptomatic of the division though, not a huge amount between most sides and the ones that do well are always invariably the squads who use the least amount of players and manage to string a few results together.Snowball wrote:What was interesting about the first batch of results was the tightness. Only one match with a GD of more than one, and plenty of draws.
Brentford looked good, but Rotherham were like rabbits in the headlights. Awful
Also the number of goals scored in 90 minutes plus.Snowball wrote:What was interesting about the first batch of results was the tightness.
Match fitness levels worse post break = more opportunities late on when fatiguedSpaghettiHoop wrote:Also the number of goals scored in 90 minutes plus.Snowball wrote:What was interesting about the first batch of results was the tightness.
Don't they just. Their manager maybe a lunatic but I get the feeling this guy might be the real deal for them.CountryRoyal wrote:Leeds look very good.
Yeah they've fallen back and settling for the counter attack. They've been really good. The fact they have a plan B and can look comfortable in both systems says a lot.Hound wrote:Do wonder about Stoke’s signings - I don’t really rate either of the front 3 they have spent a load on
Fact 37 year old Peter Crouch has come on and caused all sorts of problems adds to that
Presume Leeds were good in the first 70, as since I tuned in about that time they have been dog sh1t and should have had someone sent off.
No doubt they'll be on Lampard TV every week.Hound wrote:Fair enough. Be interesting to watch how they develop. I’m sure we’ll get plenty of opportunities
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], gazmandu, Google [Bot] and 63 guests