by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 21 Oct 2010 18:58
21 Oct 2010 18:58Look, I don't care much for rugby and know the square root of f all about itRev Algenon Stickleback H wrote:East stand tickets for Sale are quoted as £28 on the official site.
And highest quality of rugby in Europe? How many countries even play the game seriously? How many casual spectators would even know the difference between top level and lower level rugby anyway?
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 22 Oct 2010 09:36
22 Oct 2010 09:36Possibly because Irish are always an Exiled team, as are London Welsh, and London Scottish.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
Didn't Reading have a couple of rugby teams before London Irish came along?
It's Rugby for starters so it doesn't matter anywhere near so much!Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
Do you mean Richmond?Svlad Cjelli wrote:Didn't Reading have a couple of rugby teams before London Irish came along?
We're brewing our own beer now are we?Svlad Cjelli wrote:It's a fairly esoteric and academic point, really....
Just that any hops reading RFC had of growing and going up through the leagues has been as firmly squashed as any hopes of Milton Keynes City FC had of doing the same.
Any local people who enjoy the sport will naturally gravitate to the biggrr club, at the expense of the smaller one which was here before, and which now won't develop naturally. It might not have done anyway, but that's not the point - parachuting in a club from elsewhere takes away its opportunity.
I guess I just have a natural aversion to franchising in sport.
Sorry, mine was a tongue in check response really.Svlad Cjelli wrote:It's a fairly esoteric and academic point, really....
Just that any hops reading RFC had of growing and going up through the leagues has been as firmly squashed as any hopes of Milton Keynes City FC had of doing the same.
Any local people who enjoy the sport will naturally gravitate to the biggrr club, at the expense of the smaller one which was here before, and which now won't develop naturally. It might not have done anyway, but that's not the point - parachuting in a club from elsewhere takes away its opportunity.
I guess I just have a natural aversion to franchising in sport.
by SHORT AND CURLY » 22 Oct 2010 20:52
22 Oct 2010 20:52
Reading RFC did grow as big as it could, probably bigger - it was one of the top 30 clubs in the country in the early 90s. Poor management (some of the stories I know beggar belief) has led the club to where it is now and due to that they have lost a lot of people who cared about the club along the way. Some do now go to Irish as a result. Reading would never get back to that level even without Irish in town.Svlad Cjelli wrote:It's a fairly esoteric and academic point, really....
Just that any hops reading RFC had of growing and going up through the leagues has been as firmly squashed as any hopes of Milton Keynes City FC had of doing the same.
Any local people who enjoy the sport will naturally gravitate to the biggrr club, at the expense of the smaller one which was here before, and which now won't develop naturally. It might not have done anyway, but that's not the point - parachuting in a club from elsewhere takes away its opportunity.
I guess I just have a natural aversion to franchising in sport.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Oct 2010 10:47
23 Oct 2010 10:47What sort of crowds did they get though? Being in the top 30 (in playing terms) doesn't mean a great deal as the game is still very weak once you drop below the top division, and would have been far more so in the early 90s. Bracknell RFC reached the equivalent of the championship a few years back, and crowds were still pretty much Blue Square Southern level. Their "stadium" doesn't even have a fence round it.Stranded wrote:Reading RFC did grow as big as it could, probably bigger - it was one of the top 30 clubs in the country in the early 90s. Poor management (some of the stories I know beggar belief) has led the club to where it is now and due to that they have lost a lot of people who cared about the club along the way. Some do now go to Irish as a result. Reading would never get back to that level even without Irish in town.Svlad Cjelli wrote:It's a fairly esoteric and academic point, really....
Just that any hops reading RFC had of growing and going up through the leagues has been as firmly squashed as any hopes of Milton Keynes City FC had of doing the same.
Any local people who enjoy the sport will naturally gravitate to the biggrr club, at the expense of the smaller one which was here before, and which now won't develop naturally. It might not have done anyway, but that's not the point - parachuting in a club from elsewhere takes away its opportunity.
I guess I just have a natural aversion to franchising in sport.
Can you really not see the massive difference?Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Oct 2010 12:32
23 Oct 2010 12:32So if Wimbledon's owners had just moved the club to Milton Keynes or Dublin (as was mooted a one point) that would have been OK?RoyalBlue wrote:Can you really not see the massive difference?Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
The owner of MK Dons bought another club and relocated it, then changed its name in order to buy a place in league football for Milton Keynes. That should never have been allowed by the spineless football authorities. London Irish remained the same club playing at the same level and merely relocated their base.
Had Reading Rugby Club had an extremely wealthy backer, they could perhaps have done the same to London Irish!
Surely the ownership is irrelevant. It's taking a club away from it's base and supporters and parachuting it somewhere else.RoyalBlue wrote:Can you really not see the massive difference?Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
The owner of MK Dons bought another club and relocated it, then changed its name in order to buy a place in league football for Milton Keynes. That should never have been allowed by the spineless football authorities. London Irish remained the same club playing at the same level and merely relocated their base.
Had Reading Rugby Club had an extremely wealthy backer, they could perhaps have done the same to London Irish!
Wimbledon had been nomads for some time prior to the sale of the club to Winkelman but at least they'd maintained their name/identity. I don't believe Winkelman intended anything other than to use the club to buy a league presence for Milton Keynes.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Surely the ownership is irrelevant. It's taking a club away from it's base and supporters and parachuting it somewhere else.RoyalBlue wrote:Can you really not see the massive difference?Svlad Cjelli wrote:Can someone tell me what is the difference between London Irish upping sticks at their traditional location and setting up home somewhere else for purely commercial reasons .... and Mk Dons?
The owner of MK Dons bought another club and relocated it, then changed its name in order to buy a place in league football for Milton Keynes. That should never have been allowed by the spineless football authorities. London Irish remained the same club playing at the same level and merely relocated their base.
Had Reading Rugby Club had an extremely wealthy backer, they could perhaps have done the same to London Irish!
Are you really saying that Wimbledon being taken to Mk by its owners (without selling it to someone else) would have been acceptable?
Correct on both counts, but they'd been nomads within easy travelling distance for their supporters.RoyalBlue wrote:Wimbledon had been nomads for some time prior to the sale of the club to Winkelman but at least they'd maintained their name/identity. I don't believe Winkelman intended anything other than to use the club to buy a league presence for Milton Keynes.
I remember an article at the time that the move to MK was mooted, which quoted several Dons fans saying that they and a number of others were travelling into Selhurst from north of London, so actually MK would be as easy, if not easier, for them anyway.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Correct on both counts, but they'd been nomads within easy travelling distance for their supporters.RoyalBlue wrote:Wimbledon had been nomads for some time prior to the sale of the club to Winkelman but at least they'd maintained their name/identity. I don't believe Winkelman intended anything other than to use the club to buy a league presence for Milton Keynes.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 34 guests