Or Portsmouth, where the new chairman is being charged with fraud, and the holding company has gone bust so a points deduction is imminent.mr_number wrote:I LOVE the accounting threads.
In other news, at least we're not Bristol City http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15935151.stm
A total loss of about £30m in three years. Niiiiiice.
Portsmouth fans reckon they won't get a points deduction as it's not the same as Southampton as the holding company owned more businesses than just the football club.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Or Portsmouth, where the new chairman is being charged with fraud, and the holding company has gone bust so a points deduction is imminent.mr_number wrote:I LOVE the accounting threads.
In other news, at least we're not Bristol City http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15935151.stm
A total loss of about £30m in three years. Niiiiiice.
Fox Talbot wrote:The accounts say we're about +£8m on transfers since 30.6.11 which covers last year's loss and either gives us £3m to splurge in Jan or use to cover this year's losses.
Didn't look as though the Cup run and play-off final money made much impact, certainly not in comparison with the PL money.
Hmmmm, maybe. It's a moot point : http://footballmanagement.wordpress.com ... deduction/Barry the bird boggler wrote:Portsmouth fans reckon they won't get a points deduction as it's not the same as Southampton as the holding company owned more businesses than just the football club.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Or Portsmouth, where the new chairman is being charged with fraud, and the holding company has gone bust so a points deduction is imminent.mr_number wrote:I LOVE the accounting threads.
In other news, at least we're not Bristol City http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15935151.stm
A total loss of about £30m in three years. Niiiiiice.
Consider context here though. Depreciation almost certainly means contracts, for the likes of Kebe.Wycombe Royal wrote:Not necessarily, there are businesses out there that turn a loss nearly every year but which are doing quite well and continuing to grow, yet you have others who always turn a profit and go out of business. The reason is nearly always cash flow. The problem is that non-finance people always see the profit or loss as the be-all and end-all of how is business is doing yet it is probably the least important financial statement that a business produces.rhroyal wrote:Obviously cash is highly important, but you can't go discounting losses saying "It's only depreciation."Wycombe Royal wrote:You also need to understand the difference between accounting profit and the actual cash movements. If we have lost £5.3m in the year due to depreciation of assets then this is not cash that has been lost as depreciation is not a cash item.
As for players I always thought it was their contract that was the asset and that is what is depreciated. So a player with six months to go an a contract may have an asset value of practically nothing, yet he could be sold in the January transfer window for a few million. I may be wrong on that assumption though.
But we don't know which assets have been depreciated - it could be players, it could be the stadium, it could be the training ground, etc......I guess we'll have to wait and see when the accounts are published.
Ultimately losses mean the club is worse off than they were 12 months ago. End of.
I don't know who anybody in our squad we could sell for a decent amount right now, to be honest.melonhead wrote:Fox Talbot wrote:The accounts say we're about +£8m on transfers since 30.6.11 which covers last year's loss and either gives us £3m to splurge in Jan or use to cover this year's losses.
Didn't look as though the Cup run and play-off final money made much impact, certainly not in comparison with the PL money.
's what dirk said innit
hopefully, if we get kebe off the wage bill, and this extra 3 million, we may not have to sell anyone this summer..........
maybe
F//ing Spin doctor.melonhead wrote:just missed out on playoffs, playoff final, great cup runs, just outside of playoffs now
and one of the only teams to be relegated from the prem, who didnt make it straight back up who didnt go down to league 1/go into administration
yeah, awful
its amazing we have any fans at all, if thats anything to go by,
when i was watching awful football at elm park id have killed for that kind of shite football and lack of success.
No points deductions. No threat of being wound up and costly legal battles against HMRC. Actually having some integrity. No risk of assets (when I say assets I mean things like the Stadium, training ground, hotel) being flogged off on the cheap to find a bit of cash to pay the bills. You can't get a Stadium on the cheap and then flog it for a huge profit, plowing a small proportion of that money into a new stadium and go through the process again.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Forgive me for possibly regurgitating a point already addressed in our reams of accounting threads in which nobody shows any sign of actually knowing anything at all, but what is the actual benefit to being ‘well run’ as apposed to mounting debt?
I’m still waiting for the moment I’ll be able to go “See? We are the only clever team on the planet. Scrooging is what gets success, my friend!”. But all the shite football, loss of decent players, high ticket prices and shabby wages makes gloating more uncomfortable than eating in a Pizza Express with a disabled ramp. Seriously PE, get some screens or something – I’m eating here.
JM owns the training ground and rents it back to RFC according to those in the know. There is a debt on the hotel that would keep you and me and our families in luxury forever, it is a cash negative asset I think, but only just.Ian Royal wrote:No points deductions. No threat of being wound up and costly legal battles against HMRC. Actually having some integrity. No risk of assets (when I say assets I mean things like the Stadium, training ground, hotel) being flogged off on the cheap to find a bit of cash to pay the bills. You can't get a Stadium on the cheap and then flog it for a huge profit, plowing a small proportion of that money into a new stadium and go through the process again.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Forgive me for possibly regurgitating a point already addressed in our reams of accounting threads in which nobody shows any sign of actually knowing anything at all, but what is the actual benefit to being ‘well run’ as apposed to mounting debt?
I’m still waiting for the moment I’ll be able to go “See? We are the only clever team on the planet. Scrooging is what gets success, my friend!”. But all the shite football, loss of decent players, high ticket prices and shabby wages makes gloating more uncomfortable than eating in a Pizza Express with a disabled ramp. Seriously PE, get some screens or something – I’m eating here.
I don't believe we are. I think that was just the EP looking at the account and seeing £5m depreciation when in fact it was also £5m in previous seasons.rhroyal wrote:If it is just one year's account where we're making a loss due to depreciation
Extended-Phenotype wrote:F//ing Spin doctor.melonhead wrote:just missed out on playoffs, playoff final, great cup runs, just outside of playoffs now
and one of the only teams to be relegated from the prem, who didnt make it straight back up who didnt go down to league 1/go into administration
yeah, awful
its amazing we have any fans at all, if thats anything to go by,
when i was watching awful football at elm park id have killed for that kind of shite football and lack of success.
Users browsing this forum: RG30 and 50 guests