They're a workers' co-operative, a mutual organisation owned by its members. You can't get much less rich toff pcuntish than that.yuuichi wrote:..... but i refuse to buy a shirt sponsored by rich toff pcunts.
We almost certainly spoke to a couple of potential new sponsors. That's how it works! TSI would want to maximise their potential revenue, but that said, relegation would have lost one or two potential clients as well. Whilst we may enjoy the current relationship with Waitrose, we would drop them at the end of the new 2-year deal if someone is prepared to pay double what they are. At the end of the day it has very little to do with values and relationships - that's just good old PR. It's all about money.Alexander Litvinenko wrote:Of course it's not true.ZacNaloen wrote:Would most likely have been the Xbox branding on the shirt (if true) rather than microsoft anyway, and that would have been ugly and a bit shit.
If Microsoft ever enter the world of football sponsorship they'd be looking for a global brand with global coverage - and their brand values and Reading's are quite different. Just because their office is local is irrelevant to who they'd sponsor.
And anyway, why would Reading go and speak to a potential new sponsor when they already have one who they love and with whom their brand values mesh so perfectly?
Seattle Sounders are a global brand with global coverage?Alexander Litvinenko wrote:If Microsoft ever enter the world of football sponsorship they'd be looking for a global brand with global coverage - and their brand values and Reading's are quite different. Just because their office is local is irrelevant to who they'd sponsor.
I suspect they weren't too keen on you either! It's funny, most people who work for them speak very highly of them. It's pretty difficult to knock an employer that shares their profits with their staff the way that they do!yuuichi wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOO ;(
My Kyocera shirt is getting a bit worn out, but i refuse to buy a shirt sponsored by rich toff pcunts. Was looking forward to getting a shirt this year. Looks like i'll have to wait a few more years. (Bet it's got something to do with SJM being a hardcore tory).
KYOCERA COME BACK!!!!
Edit: I've worked at John Lewis in Reading and Waitrose in Wokingham. I don't like them or their condescending values
Not sure whether they still do it but at one stage I believe that Microsoft had a policy of annually firing those that they perceived to be their lowest 10% performers. Would fit in well with top level professional football's values.Deadlock wrote:Seattle Sounders are a global brand with global coverage?Alexander Litvinenko wrote:If Microsoft ever enter the world of football sponsorship they'd be looking for a global brand with global coverage - and their brand values and Reading's are quite different. Just because their office is local is irrelevant to who they'd sponsor.
Was it because you were nicking their chips and putting them on your shoulder?NOOOOOOOOOOOO ;(
My Kyocera shirt is getting a bit worn out, but i refuse to buy a shirt sponsored by rich toff pcunts. Was looking forward to getting a shirt this year. Looks like i'll have to wait a few more years. (Bet it's got something to do with SJM being a hardcore tory).
KYOCERA COME BACK!!!!
Edit: I've worked at John Lewis in Reading and Waitrose in Wokingham. I don't like them or their condescending values
USA_Loyal_Royal wrote:i like the waitrose logo on our kits so i am pleased with this! i obvioiusly cant shop at a waitrose since i live in the states so i have no idea what its like.
What is The Waitrose Way?
Waitrose believes in championing British produce, treading lightly on the environment, supporting responsible sourcing and treating people fairly.
What is The Reading Way?
Reading believes in championing British produce, treading lightly on the environment, supporting responsible sourcing and treating people fairly.
winchester_royal wrote:Plus, in the Winchester one at least, they seem to exclusively hire very attractive females.
I've never worked for them but know people who do.Stuka wrote:I briefly worked for John Lewis and thought it was a good company that had lots of perks for staff.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 114 guests