Cheers R&RRoyals and Racers wrote:"3 points" in my opinion has posted the facts succinctly and his responses to further questions have been insightful (on both threads running) so i assume you are referring to others ?Nameless wrote:There is a guy who each year does a very good analysis of the accounts for STAR, I can't recall his name and there is every chance he posts on here.
Any way, what he produces always seems very credible and usually corrects all the misconceptions, misrepresentations and misunderstandings that get posted on here as being 'facts'. I hope he is doing the same with this years's accounts and look forward to reading something on the subject which casts genuine light.
I recommend others do the same !
Daz, there's nothing in there that can help anyone draw those kind of conclusions. Unfortunately the accounts only state that the debts had been transferred to a third party lender (who, conceivably could have been Vibrac as at 30 June 2014).loyalroyaldaz wrote:Does it look like anywhere in there that the future parachute payments were mortgaged/loaned from Vibrac and that money subsequently dissapeared somewhere as i have been led to believe?
I understand the annual analysis is on its way and will be posted on the STAR website when available.3points wrote:Cheers R&RRoyals and Racers wrote:"3 points" in my opinion has posted the facts succinctly and his responses to further questions have been insightful (on both threads running) so i assume you are referring to others ?Nameless wrote:There is a guy who each year does a very good analysis of the accounts for STAR, I can't recall his name and there is every chance he posts on here.
Any way, what he produces always seems very credible and usually corrects all the misconceptions, misrepresentations and misunderstandings that get posted on here as being 'facts'. I hope he is doing the same with this years's accounts and look forward to reading something on the subject which casts genuine light.
I recommend others do the same !
Very sketchy and incomplete, but iirc the basics areHarpers So Solid Crew wrote:Can someone show how the debt has increased over the years, it is surely unsustainable now.
Are you suggesting someone's cooked the books, 2-0Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Except that is the rough profit or loss, not the debt.
The debt has changed within those figures.
Which is largely how the debt changes most years. I did say it was incomplete.Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Except that is the rough profit or loss, not the debt.
The debt has changed within those figures.
I think it's someone linked to STAR and it appears on http://star-reading.org/ but not forever as they take old news off and only keep the new news.Ian Royal wrote:Yes there's someone who writes a full breakdown article. Not on HNA although it often gets linked. At least I've seen it in the past.
The accounts are for the year ended 30 June 2014. Royston went to Wednesday in September.Reading4eva wrote:Out of interest, were Royston's wages being paid by Sheffield Wednesday or do these accounts include what we were paying him. Anyone have an idea on this front?
The latest report / analysis by a knowledgeable STAR member (aren't we all?) has just been posted on the STAR website 9th Jan 4.55pm so that should add some facts to this thread.Forbury Lion wrote:I think it's someone linked to STAR and it appears on http://star-reading.org/ but not forever as they take old news off and only keep the new news.Ian Royal wrote:Yes there's someone who writes a full breakdown article. Not on HNA although it often gets linked. At least I've seen it in the past.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests