After signing a five year contract in the summer, no chance. Would take big bucksNewCorkSeth wrote:Swift - 7 - A player we have missed badly. Can see him leaving in January for a smaller fee than we would like to see. MOTM.
After signing a five year contract in the summer, no chance. Would take big bucksNewCorkSeth wrote:Swift - 7 - A player we have missed badly. Can see him leaving in January for a smaller fee than we would like to see. MOTM.
I think that Stam needs someone to advise him. He's a young manager - he'll make mistakes. What he needs is someone to point this out and help him get it right.Woodcote Royal wrote:Thought we’d turned a corner last week but now it appears it’s back to square one.
My bottom line was don’t start without a striker whilst having one fit and ready to go on the bench or sat in the stand.
Well, fair enough, Bod was injured, but last week was also about a defence that didn’t leak like a sieve. So, having stumbled upon such a rare beast thanks to our mounting injury crisis, more of the same should surely been the order of the day.
Don’t be silly. All that seemed clear about yesterday’s defence on Radio Berks was that it wasn’t the same as last weeks. Tim and Kev seemed to spend much of the afternoon trying to work out who was playing where.
Frankly, I feel like saying a big FFS![]()
If yesterday’s match day squad and tactics are the best he could achieve from an uninterrupted week of training with this talented and expensively assembled squad, what is there left to say![]()
In every walk of life management is about getting the most out of the resources at your disposal and whereas Stam did extremely well last season this one is turning into a disaster all of his own making.
What we really needed this summer was a keeper and a striker and he was given enough resources to acquire the required quality in both departments. Instead we got enough midfielders to prevent the highly talented Kelly and Swift playing a full role (I could handle some initial failure in order to sacrifice for the future)
He also sold/loaned out existing strike options before acquiring replacements. No one will tell me, at the very least, that Dominic Samuel would not have been a welcome addition for the cup games nor that, given our huge summer outlay, giving him another year to prove himself would not have been a comparately cheap and worthwhile punt.
I know our national game is littered with prematurely off loaded managers but surely those who are given more time need to be barking up the right tree. Nothing I’ve seen from Stam this season suggests this is still the case and every week that passes the whole he’s digging gets deeper.
Thanks for all the match reports
Why the hell didn't he play Smith?Sutekh wrote:Dont need to be a professional to know that plan A (i.e. dont play strikers but play a load of wingers) does not work and makes for nothing more than utterly pathetic football and zero threat. We all knew what to expect as soon as the lack of Bod was revealed yesterday.strap wrote:Not me, my boy who was scouting Sheff Utd for upcoming game v LUFC, (he's an RFC fan and former ST holder)
"Woeful. Men against boys. Only shining light was Swift who made a huge difference. No other positives whatsoever. Pathetic."
Rather think I trust a professional's view on the performance rather than the cr@p Stam spouts.
Wonder if itll be the same next week or will there be an experienced striker available?
Just a bit worried that some of our better players and even some of our good players not getting much game time will be thinking about jumping ship.genome wrote:After signing a five year contract in the summer, no chance. Would take big bucksNewCorkSeth wrote:Swift - 7 - A player we have missed badly. Can see him leaving in January for a smaller fee than we would like to see. MOTM.
Because clearly he feels he's not ready yet. He did take a goal well (almost two hours into a game against Millwall's second string), but aside from that he got absolutely bullied in his limited appearances this season.RG7Fan wrote:Why the hell didn't he play Smith?Sutekh wrote:Dont need to be a professional to know that plan A (i.e. dont play strikers but play a load of wingers) does not work and makes for nothing more than utterly pathetic football and zero threat. We all knew what to expect as soon as the lack of Bod was revealed yesterday.strap wrote:Not me, my boy who was scouting Sheff Utd for upcoming game v LUFC, (he's an RFC fan and former ST holder)
"Woeful. Men against boys. Only shining light was Swift who made a huge difference. No other positives whatsoever. Pathetic."
Rather think I trust a professional's view on the performance rather than the cr@p Stam spouts.
Wonder if itll be the same next week or will there be an experienced striker available?
That was always the danger bringing so many midfielders in.NewCorkSeth wrote:Just a bit worried that some of our better players and even some of our good players not getting much game time will be thinking about jumping ship.genome wrote:After signing a five year contract in the summer, no chance. Would take big bucksNewCorkSeth wrote:Swift - 7 - A player we have missed badly. Can see him leaving in January for a smaller fee than we would like to see. MOTM.
I was thinking the same thing this morning. He may get advice from the Director of football, Brian Tevreden and from what I've been told Steven Reid often spoke his mind. But I get the feeling Stam's an emotional person beneath his hard exterior and spikes when questioned. I also know that that following the team's 3rd place finish everyone at the club moved heaven and earth to support him ahead of this season. I think Stam pretty much called the shots so far.leon wrote:I think that Stam needs someone to advise him. He's a young manager - he'll make mistakes. What he needs is someone to point this out and help him get it right.Woodcote Royal wrote:Thought we’d turned a corner last week but now it appears it’s back to square one.
My bottom line was don’t start without a striker whilst having one fit and ready to go on the bench or sat in the stand.
Well, fair enough, Bod was injured, but last week was also about a defence that didn’t leak like a sieve. So, having stumbled upon such a rare beast thanks to our mounting injury crisis, more of the same should surely been the order of the day.
Don’t be silly. All that seemed clear about yesterday’s defence on Radio Berks was that it wasn’t the same as last weeks. Tim and Kev seemed to spend much of the afternoon trying to work out who was playing where.
Frankly, I feel like saying a big FFS![]()
If yesterday’s match day squad and tactics are the best he could achieve from an uninterrupted week of training with this talented and expensively assembled squad, what is there left to say![]()
In every walk of life management is about getting the most out of the resources at your disposal and whereas Stam did extremely well last season this one is turning into a disaster all of his own making.
What we really needed this summer was a keeper and a striker and he was given enough resources to acquire the required quality in both departments. Instead we got enough midfielders to prevent the highly talented Kelly and Swift playing a full role (I could handle some initial failure in order to sacrifice for the future)
He also sold/loaned out existing strike options before acquiring replacements. No one will tell me, at the very least, that Dominic Samuel would not have been a welcome addition for the cup games nor that, given our huge summer outlay, giving him another year to prove himself would not have been a comparately cheap and worthwhile punt.
I know our national game is littered with prematurely off loaded managers but surely those who are given more time need to be barking up the right tree. Nothing I’ve seen from Stam this season suggests this is still the case and every week that passes the whole he’s digging gets deeper.
Thanks for all the match reports
At the moment we are doing the same (wrong) things expecting a different outcome.
Probably re-Reading the BFTG threads for Millwall and Gillingham in the cup would tell you whyRG7Fan wrote:
Why the hell didn't he play Smith?
So basically all round fvcking useless.Hound wrote:
Simple thing is we just need to play better. Tactics going forward need to be better, movement needs to be better and we need to stop conceding every bloody game
Well yeah. But also all things we got right one game ago against Leeds in a very good winPandoras Box wrote:So basically all round fvcking useless.Hound wrote:
Simple thing is we just need to play better. Tactics going forward need to be better, movement needs to be better and we need to stop conceding every bloody game
So why do you think Stam changed that winning formation? He could have used Smith to replace Bod but instead chose to go back to his old ways and most of us not being able to make out a formation at all. I've read the posts saying Smith isn't good enough so please explain why Stam put the lad on the bench?Hound wrote:Well yeah. But also all things we got right one game ago against Leeds in a very good winPandoras Box wrote:So basically all round fvcking useless.Hound wrote:
Simple thing is we just need to play better. Tactics going forward need to be better, movement needs to be better and we need to stop conceding every bloody game
Because he thinks Smith is less good than Beerens, Aluko or Barrow being the obvious answer.RG7Fan wrote:Why the hell didn't he play Smith?Sutekh wrote:Dont need to be a professional to know that plan A (i.e. dont play strikers but play a load of wingers) does not work and makes for nothing more than utterly pathetic football and zero threat. We all knew what to expect as soon as the lack of Bod was revealed yesterday.strap wrote:Not me, my boy who was scouting Sheff Utd for upcoming game v LUFC, (he's an RFC fan and former ST holder)
"Woeful. Men against boys. Only shining light was Swift who made a huge difference. No other positives whatsoever. Pathetic."
Rather think I trust a professional's view on the performance rather than the cr@p Stam spouts.
Wonder if itll be the same next week or will there be an experienced striker available?
I don't agree with the subs Stam makes in general.Oilroyal wrote:So why do you think Stam changed that winning formation? He could have used Smith to replace Bod but instead chose to go back to his old ways and most of us not being able to make out a formation at all. I've read the posts saying Smith isn't good enough so please explain why Stam put the lad on the bench?Hound wrote:Well yeah. But also all things we got right one game ago against Leeds in a very good winPandoras Box wrote:
So basically all round fvcking useless.
Hound, I do admire you plugging away in Stam's defence but come on mate, run with the facts, things have been complete pants and another 3 games of this shit and we'll be in real bother.
Agreed. Stam also leaves it way too late to pull that rabbit out.Oilroyal wrote:I was thinking the same thing this morning. He may get advice from the Director of football, Brian Tevreden and from what I've been told Steven Reid often spoke his mind. But I get the feeling Stam's an emotional person beneath his hard exterior and spikes when questioned. I also know that that following the team's 3rd place finish everyone at the club moved heaven and earth to support him ahead of this season. I think Stam pretty much called the shots so far.leon wrote:I think that Stam needs someone to advise him. He's a young manager - he'll make mistakes. What he needs is someone to point this out and help him get it right.Woodcote Royal wrote:Thought we’d turned a corner last week but now it appears it’s back to square one.
My bottom line was don’t start without a striker whilst having one fit and ready to go on the bench or sat in the stand.
Well, fair enough, Bod was injured, but last week was also about a defence that didn’t leak like a sieve. So, having stumbled upon such a rare beast thanks to our mounting injury crisis, more of the same should surely been the order of the day.
Don’t be silly. All that seemed clear about yesterday’s defence on Radio Berks was that it wasn’t the same as last weeks. Tim and Kev seemed to spend much of the afternoon trying to work out who was playing where.
Frankly, I feel like saying a big FFS![]()
If yesterday’s match day squad and tactics are the best he could achieve from an uninterrupted week of training with this talented and expensively assembled squad, what is there left to say![]()
In every walk of life management is about getting the most out of the resources at your disposal and whereas Stam did extremely well last season this one is turning into a disaster all of his own making.
What we really needed this summer was a keeper and a striker and he was given enough resources to acquire the required quality in both departments. Instead we got enough midfielders to prevent the highly talented Kelly and Swift playing a full role (I could handle some initial failure in order to sacrifice for the future)
He also sold/loaned out existing strike options before acquiring replacements. No one will tell me, at the very least, that Dominic Samuel would not have been a welcome addition for the cup games nor that, given our huge summer outlay, giving him another year to prove himself would not have been a comparately cheap and worthwhile punt.
I know our national game is littered with prematurely off loaded managers but surely those who are given more time need to be barking up the right tree. Nothing I’ve seen from Stam this season suggests this is still the case and every week that passes the whole he’s digging gets deeper.
Thanks for all the match reports
At the moment we are doing the same (wrong) things expecting a different outcome.
After 3 wins in 12, Stam needs some serious help but I fear he's not one for advice from others on matters of his own doing. In his mind he wants to pull the rabbit from the hat all by himself.
Nah. Striker like certain other roles are specialist positions. The runs you need to make, where you need to be to receive the ball, being able to react to half chances all different to being a midfielder. Playing a small winger who isn't even quick is ridiculous. Ridiculous.Snowflake Royal wrote:Because he thinks Smith is less good than Beerens, Aluko or Barrow being the obvious answer.RG7Fan wrote:Why the hell didn't he play Smith?Sutekh wrote:
Dont need to be a professional to know that plan A (i.e. dont play strikers but play a load of wingers) does not work and makes for nothing more than utterly pathetic football and zero threat. We all knew what to expect as soon as the lack of Bod was revealed yesterday.
Wonder if itll be the same next week or will there be an experienced striker available?
Clamour for Smith is very much a case of putting faith in someone purely because they're someone different who's not really been seen. Any striker, no matter their experience, quality or goalscoring record is not automatically superior to senior forwards. There's this weird obssession with football fans that it's better the devil you don't know.
Smith's had a couple of chances in the first team and not impressed. It's not even like he's scored loads in the Academy, a decent amount for sure, but the step up is huge.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers and 473 guests