I've not seen any moaning. I've seen a lot of posts with concerns about the team and the season. But they are very valid.tidus_mi2 wrote:Most expected us to be dominated by Villa and would take a point before the match, that very scenario happens and people moan.LUX wrote:Great result, hope it turns a corner.
Dismayed, but not surprised, by the moaning on here.
I'm used to Reading fans by now.
A: i was being facetious I was fairly certain you didn’t go.LUX wrote:A. No. I am on the other side of the world. With Green.
B. It’s a results business. I guess you would rather we played brillliantly and lose. Me, no, I’m happy with the fighting, no doubt fortunate, point. We could easily have scored three, mind you.
C. I never like the slagging on here. Ditto booing the team. You carry on, it’s your right.
Hopefully. It felt like a big goal to me. Can’t really explain it but really felt at the time had we lost that it would have been hard to recover mentally and confidence wise. We really, really need to build on this. Got to get a win from somewhere though!genome wrote:CR - I think what they are saying is, despite fluking the result, grabbing a last minute equaliser will hopefully change our fortunes going forward. It's always good for a squad low on morale.
3 out of our next 4 matches are winnable home games. We must have at least 1 victory by the end of that run.CountryRoyal wrote:Hopefully. It felt like a big goal to me. Can’t really explain it but really felt at the time had we lost that it would have been hard to recover mentally and confidence wise. We really, really need to build on this. Got to get a win from somewhere though!genome wrote:CR - I think what they are saying is, despite fluking the result, grabbing a last minute equaliser will hopefully change our fortunes going forward. It's always good for a squad low on morale.
1. First half corner could easily have been bundled in.CountryRoyal wrote:A: i was being facetious I was fairly certain you didn’t go.LUX wrote:A. No. I am on the other side of the world. With Green.
B. It’s a results business. I guess you would rather we played brillliantly and lose. Me, no, I’m happy with the fighting, no doubt fortunate, point. We could easily have scored three, mind you.
C. I never like the slagging on here. Ditto booing the team. You carry on, it’s your right.
B: I know it’s a results business, and I more than most accept that. Under Stam in first season I was happy because we were winning even if the football was shit. I’d still say it how I saw it though. How could we have “easily scored three”? The double chance could only ever have culminated in 1 goal, but that goes without saying.
C: I’m sorry you got offended by someone “slagging off” a performance, on an Internet forum. Wow.
You’re not surprised by people “moaning”? The only thing I’m not surprised at is people who didn’t even go to the game, or didn’t even watch it, come on here and criticise someone’s view because we got a good point and maybe they saw 30 second highlights and we had a good chance.You couldn’t make it up.
I absolutely would have taken a point before the game and I’m delighted we got it, but that doesn’t change a lot especially given how the goal really came about. It want through any degree of mounted pressure, it never looked likely it was a shit ball and somehow Sims who was never favourite to get to the ball, did and Chester did a McShane.
Had Chester just picked up the ball in his own half and walked into his goal himself would you be just as happy?
The result was excellent, the performance in the first half was ok, the performance in the second half was a million miles below the level required to be competitive. Draw or not.
You posted in the minutes after we scored and got the draw:CountryRoyal wrote:A: i was being facetious I was fairly certain you didn’t go.LUX wrote:A. No. I am on the other side of the world. With Green.
B. It’s a results business. I guess you would rather we played brillliantly and lose. Me, no, I’m happy with the fighting, no doubt fortunate, point. We could easily have scored three, mind you.
C. I never like the slagging on here. Ditto booing the team. You carry on, it’s your right.
B: I know it’s a results business, and I more than most accept that. Under Stam in first season I was happy because we were winning even if the football was shit. I’d still say it how I saw it though. How could we have “easily scored three”? The double chance could only ever have culminated in 1 goal, but that goes without saying.
C: I’m sorry you got offended by someone “slagging off” a performance, on an Internet forum. Wow.
You’re not surprised by people “moaning”? The only thing I’m not surprised at is people who didn’t even go to the game, or didn’t even watch it, come on here and criticise someone’s view because we got a good point and maybe they saw 30 second highlights and we had a good chance.You couldn’t make it up.
I absolutely would have taken a point before the game and I’m delighted we got it, but that doesn’t change a lot especially given how the goal really came about. It want through any degree of mounted pressure, it never looked likely it was a shit ball and somehow Sims who was never favourite to get to the ball, did and Chester did a McShane.
Had Chester just picked up the ball in his own half and walked into his goal himself would you be just as happy?
The result was excellent, the performance in the first half was ok, the performance in the second half was a million miles below the level required to be competitive. Draw or not.
And? I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove here? That I thought the performance was dreadful? Have I not accurately portrayed that enough in this thread?LUX wrote: You posted in the minutes after we scored and got the draw:
« That. Was. Fcking. Dreadful ».
Check out page 6 of the match thread.
Yeah that’s fair enough. On a performance basis I wasn’t happy, but I’d still take playing shit and winning over playing well and losing. I remember saying that a few times as well.genome wrote:BTW CR, I think the assertion that you were happy because we were winning under Stam is slightly revisionist, I remember having several arguments with you on here in the 16/17 season because you were very much unhappy
Well then I’m not sure what your point is here. Anyway enjoy your time on the other side of the world. Anywhere nice?LUX wrote:You certainly have
I think whoever said turning points was referring to last season. As in we’ve seen enough times moments which might spur the team on, but that never materialised and it was more of the same shit that followed.Snowflake Royal wrote:1. First half corner could easily have been bundled in.CountryRoyal wrote:A: i was being facetious I was fairly certain you didn’t go.LUX wrote:A. No. I am on the other side of the world. With Green.
B. It’s a results business. I guess you would rather we played brillliantly and lose. Me, no, I’m happy with the fighting, no doubt fortunate, point. We could easily have scored three, mind you.
C. I never like the slagging on here. Ditto booing the team. You carry on, it’s your right.
B: I know it’s a results business, and I more than most accept that. Under Stam in first season I was happy because we were winning even if the football was shit. I’d still say it how I saw it though. How could we have “easily scored three”? The double chance could only ever have culminated in 1 goal, but that goes without saying.
C: I’m sorry you got offended by someone “slagging off” a performance, on an Internet forum. Wow.
You’re not surprised by people “moaning”? The only thing I’m not surprised at is people who didn’t even go to the game, or didn’t even watch it, come on here and criticise someone’s view because we got a good point and maybe they saw 30 second highlights and we had a good chance.You couldn’t make it up.
I absolutely would have taken a point before the game and I’m delighted we got it, but that doesn’t change a lot especially given how the goal really came about. It want through any degree of mounted pressure, it never looked likely it was a shit ball and somehow Sims who was never favourite to get to the ball, did and Chester did a McShane.
Had Chester just picked up the ball in his own half and walked into his goal himself would you be just as happy?
The result was excellent, the performance in the first half was ok, the performance in the second half was a million miles below the level required to be competitive. Draw or not.
2. But for an incredible save Baldock had a tap in.
3. The penalty we scored.
I'd assume that's what Lux was referring to for three goals.
The encouraging things about this game are that. We expected it to be tough, and it was. But we largely stood up to and kept Villa out, they only scored once. We kept playing to the final whistle and didn't give up. That persistence salvaged a result from being behind.
I don't see how the penalty can be considered flukey. Sims used his pace to get to the ball first and the defender went to ground, making contact with Sims and failing to clear the ball.
I'm not sure how anyone can say we've talked about turning points before either. We haven't had any. We finished badly against Derby. We finished badly against Forest. We just downright played badly against Bolton and finishec badly against Blackburn. This is the first chink of light and posituve to take from a league game this season. Yeah we won in the cup, I suppose we can include that as a possible turning point, but then we've only lost one game since then (two before).
Just from watching the highlights it looks like we could have won 3:1 - two guilt edge chances than we some how conspired to miss.CountryRoyal wrote:No, what is happening is that a fluky last minute penalty has completely changed people’s view of the game. Win or lose or draw I look at it as a performance and I would have said by and large the exact same things had the game finished 1-0.
LUX and tidus did you even go?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal, zaskar and 102 guests