You're a pcunt.Old Man Andrews wrote:Guys, far too cordial. Call someone a pcunt or something please.
You're a pcunt.Old Man Andrews wrote:Guys, far too cordial. Call someone a pcunt or something please.
Thats better.NewCorkSeth wrote:You're a pcunt.Old Man Andrews wrote:Guys, far too cordial. Call someone a pcunt or something please.
6 in 14 games, this is on top of 18 out of 23 conceded this season in the 2nd half of games.NewCorkSeth wrote:
So how many goals is that straight after halftime now? 6? 7? That's incredible. It's like we are going for a record.
The Kelly pass summed up the lack of intelligence in the players more than an impulse to go backwards, he simply did not need to play that pass. He couldn't pass forward at that point but there was a perfectly safe pass over to Yiadom that would have opened up the game on the other flank that he simply didn't see or chose not to look at. A pass backwards can be quite attacking if it shifts the play, his pass was pointless in all circumstances.Victor Meldrew wrote:
The Kelly pass summed us up-far too concerned with going backwards rather than forwards and last night you couldn't help think that nothing has changed much from the days of Stam.
I hope Clement can patch things up with Barrow as the options of him (on form) and McCleary (fit) might mean that we get to stay in this division but otherwise there seems little can be done to make these players concentrate more and compete for 90 minutes in every game and there is the real prospect of Div 1 football next season.
It could just be that this division is a much of a muchness with no team being special but we surely need to do more when we come up against the likes of Sheffield United, Middlesborough,Swansea etc.as well as doing what we don't seem that good at, i.e. beating the lesser sides or at least not losing to them.
That's mighty impressive isn't it. We're sure to have another record come the end of the season.windermereROYAL wrote:6 in 14 games, this is on top of 18 out of 23 conceded this season in the 2nd half of games.NewCorkSeth wrote:
So how many goals is that straight after halftime now? 6? 7? That's incredible. It's like we are going for a record.
Yes, but apart from Swift the players always seem to want to pass backwards as first choice (do you remember one of our old players, Chris Gunter?)-it is a mindset which IMHO needs changing.Stranded wrote:The Kelly pass summed up the lack of intelligence in the players more than an impulse to go backwards, he simply did not need to play that pass. He couldn't pass forward at that point but there was a perfectly safe pass over to Yiadom that would have opened up the game on the other flank that he simply didn't see or chose not to look at. A pass backwards can be quite attacking if it shifts the play, his pass was pointless in all circumstances.Victor Meldrew wrote:
The Kelly pass summed us up-far too concerned with going backwards rather than forwards and last night you couldn't help think that nothing has changed much from the days of Stam.
I hope Clement can patch things up with Barrow as the options of him (on form) and McCleary (fit) might mean that we get to stay in this division but otherwise there seems little can be done to make these players concentrate more and compete for 90 minutes in every game and there is the real prospect of Div 1 football next season.
It could just be that this division is a much of a muchness with no team being special but we surely need to do more when we come up against the likes of Sheffield United, Middlesborough,Swansea etc.as well as doing what we don't seem that good at, i.e. beating the lesser sides or at least not losing to them.
The only thing that is important here is that we lost, again.John Smith wrote:I do think we had a bit of bad luck last night - that chance from a couple of yards that hit the keeper rather than him making a save, then they go up the other end and score. Also if Meite was a bit more clinical with that first chance on the half hour mark, we go in 1-0 up.
These are the margins.
Clearly some team / motivation issues in keeping up 90 mins determined attack, but I also keep seeing Swift as one showing the positive intent. Not seen a game in the flesh this season, but the patient possession at all costs tactic - an infection we caught under Stam, but I thought we'd left behind - seems to be a problem without more players (like Swift) prepared to vary the pace and bring it forward - or that dominant advancing centre-back idea.Victor Meldrew wrote:
Yes, but apart from Swift the players always seem to want to pass backwards as first choice (do you remember one of our old players, Chris Gunter?)-it is a mindset which IMHO needs changing.
It might be different if we had Beckenbauer and Bobby Moore at the back but we haven't.
My point preciselyOld Man Andrews wrote:
The only thing that is important here is that we lost, again.
Clement has arguably lost the players ....
I feel costly mistakes are the difference. We have professionals making huge mistakes all the time, gifting goals therefore always chasing games or letting the opposition get back into gamesJohn Smith wrote:I do think we had a bit of bad luck last night - that chance from a couple of yards that hit the keeper rather than him making a save, then they go up the other end and score. Also if Meite was a bit more clinical with that first chance on the half hour mark, we go in 1-0 up.
These are the margins.
Perhaps the other way of looking at it is that half time gives the opposition the opportunity to take stock and exploit our weaknesses better.stealthpapes wrote:Half time is clearly an issue - perhaps not in the managers' instructions, but in how the team use it to reset and recover. Take tonight, sure, an unforced error, but the defending was sloppy. The goalscorer was unmarked, and directed a loose ball past the keeper.
Yes which Clement singularly fails to address during that second half.Platypuss wrote:Perhaps the other way of looking at it is that half time gives the opposition the opportunity to take stock and exploit our weaknesses better.stealthpapes wrote:Half time is clearly an issue - perhaps not in the managers' instructions, but in how the team use it to reset and recover. Take tonight, sure, an unforced error, but the defending was sloppy. The goalscorer was unmarked, and directed a loose ball past the keeper.
Well, we should do the same thing to the opposition, right?Platypuss wrote:Perhaps the other way of looking at it is that half time gives the opposition the opportunity to take stock and exploit our weaknesses better.stealthpapes wrote:Half time is clearly an issue - perhaps not in the managers' instructions, but in how the team use it to reset and recover. Take tonight, sure, an unforced error, but the defending was sloppy. The goalscorer was unmarked, and directed a loose ball past the keeper.
I would not argue with that.Platypuss wrote:Perhaps the other way of looking at it is that half time gives the opposition the opportunity to take stock and exploit our weaknesses better.stealthpapes wrote:Half time is clearly an issue - perhaps not in the managers' instructions, but in how the team use it to reset and recover. Take tonight, sure, an unforced error, but the defending was sloppy. The goalscorer was unmarked, and directed a loose ball past the keeper.
Bit hard when you're normally 1 down after 5 minutes of it.Zip wrote:Yes which Clement singularly fails to address during that second half.Platypuss wrote:Perhaps the other way of looking at it is that half time gives the opposition the opportunity to take stock and exploit our weaknesses better.stealthpapes wrote:Half time is clearly an issue - perhaps not in the managers' instructions, but in how the team use it to reset and recover. Take tonight, sure, an unforced error, but the defending was sloppy. The goalscorer was unmarked, and directed a loose ball past the keeper.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Royals and Racers and 270 guests