Depends which league we're in & what alternatives are available.NewCorkSeth wrote:His contract is up this summer.. would you take him back?
I don't think that would be a decent midfield.LWJ wrote:I'd have him back in a heartbeat.
A decent midfield of Swift, Williams and a defensive midfielder would be pretty solid.
He was also a regular in the side that finished 7th and 3rd too. It’s very early to say Rinomhota is the better player.URZZZZ wrote:Remember he was a regular in the team when we were languishing around 19th place as well, Williams and Rinomhota are too similar to be in the same midfield, and Rinomhota is a better player. Taking into account Williams is now injury prone, taking him back is probably daft, especially with the wages he's probably sitting onZip wrote:I don’t see him as our saviour but I do feel he is better than we currently have.Snowflake Royal wrote: Absence makes the heart grow fonder... see every player who hasn't played for a while will be our saviour.
Current Rinomhota is probably comfortably better for us than current Danny Williams though.Zip wrote:He was also a regular in the side that finished 7th and 3rd too. It’s very early to say Rinomhota is the better player.URZZZZ wrote:Remember he was a regular in the team when we were languishing around 19th place as well, Williams and Rinomhota are too similar to be in the same midfield, and Rinomhota is a better player. Taking into account Williams is now injury prone, taking him back is probably daft, especially with the wages he's probably sitting onZip wrote:
I don’t see him as our saviour but I do feel he is better than we currently have.
Not in Rino’s last couple of appearances he wasn’t. There was a bit of a dip before the injury.Snowflake Royal wrote:Current Rinomhota is probably comfortably better for us than current Danny Williams though.Zip wrote:He was also a regular in the side that finished 7th and 3rd too. It’s very early to say Rinomhota is the better player.URZZZZ wrote:
Remember he was a regular in the team when we were languishing around 19th place as well, Williams and Rinomhota are too similar to be in the same midfield, and Rinomhota is a better player. Taking into account Williams is now injury prone, taking him back is probably daft, especially with the wages he's probably sitting on
If you're picking Rino's worst couple then fantasy Williams is abysmal in his hypothetical first couple of games back. So nyar.Zip wrote:Not in Rino’s last couple of appearances he wasn’t. There was a bit of a dip before the injury.Snowflake Royal wrote:Current Rinomhota is probably comfortably better for us than current Danny Williams though.Zip wrote:
He was also a regular in the side that finished 7th and 3rd too. It’s very early to say Rinomhota is the better player.
Eh? None of us know what Williams plans are. He left us to have a crack at top flight football. He can’t be blamed for that. Where he goes from here nobody knows.NewCorkSeth wrote:Isn't it a bit sad that players in situations like William's would rather go out with a paycheck than a bang. I mean any player like William's must have earned a decent amount of cash by now and should really be looking to play competitive exciting football rather than slum it in some sub par league to earn a relative fortune.
I guess with him being American he could handily grab a contract in the states and still look for international games.
Eh? I'm clearly speaking in general. Not specifically for or about Williams.Zip wrote:Eh? None of us know what Williams plans are. He left us to have a crack at top flight football. He can’t be blamed for that. Where he goes from here nobody knows.NewCorkSeth wrote:Isn't it a bit sad that players in situations like William's would rather go out with a paycheck than a bang. I mean any player like William's must have earned a decent amount of cash by now and should really be looking to play competitive exciting football rather than slum it in some sub par league to earn a relative fortune.
I guess with him being American he could handily grab a contract in the states and still look for international games.
Go out with a bang? With who, us?NewCorkSeth wrote:Isn't it a bit sad that players in situations like William's would rather go out with a paycheck than a bang.
Which was to naturally be expected, he'll pick it up after a couple of games. I'm not one for overhyping academy players in the slightest, but Rinomhota is a class above and is better than Danny "I play well on TV" WilliamsZip wrote:Not in Rino’s last couple of appearances he wasn’t. There was a bit of a dip before the injury.Snowflake Royal wrote:Current Rinomhota is probably comfortably better for us than current Danny Williams though.Zip wrote:
He was also a regular in the side that finished 7th and 3rd too. It’s very early to say Rinomhota is the better player.
He is a difficult one to classify. I would have said box to box midfielder but you make a valid point that he hasn't scored or really even had a shot yet which has me gazumped again. He doesn't sit back enough to be a holding midfielder, take Leigertwood, Joey etc, naturally holding players. Rino plays nothing like themDenver Royal wrote:Go out with a bang? With who, us?NewCorkSeth wrote:Isn't it a bit sad that players in situations like William's would rather go out with a paycheck than a bang.
Rino in mid, not defined, what system? Had ‘discussion’ in here (ended in name calling shocker). Runs around with energy. Heard in here he’s now not a def-mid cos doesn’t shield back-4 (makes sense, cos he is wasn’t a def-mid in Academy).
Bit of a tweener, nice guy, takes photos with kids?
Instead, hearing in here he’s now a Box-to-Box Midfielder (What, like Sids?)
Back in the day Lamps, Gerrard, Scholes were that. So, looking for goals, assists, etc. Does he look the part and have a shot on him? On a relative level, of course.
Yes, Academy grad, a kid, I’m harsh, wash your mouth out, etc.
Hopeful, looking to others to break down his game, where he projects in Champ (.yes, enjoy him while we can, heard he’ll be in PL/CL).
On the basis of 18 games? You really have no idea about anything to do with football do you.URZZZZ wrote: Which was to naturally be expected, he'll pick it up after a couple of games. I'm not one for overhyping academy players in the slightest, but Rinomhota is a class above and is better than Danny "I play well on TV" Williams
So 18 games isn't enough time to judge Rinomhota but 4 starts is enough for you to call McNulty useless. OK then, that makes senseJohn Smith wrote:On the basis of 18 games? You really have no idea about anything to do with football do you.URZZZZ wrote: Which was to naturally be expected, he'll pick it up after a couple of games. I'm not one for overhyping academy players in the slightest, but Rinomhota is a class above and is better than Danny "I play well on TV" Williams
So you're disagreeing with the manager then? The guy who also decided he wasn't good enough for us so shipped him out? McNulty is 26 and has never played at a level this high. Rinomhota is a very exciting prospect and looks like he will be a success but he's done nothing yet - that's all I'm saying.URZZZZ wrote: So 18 games isn't enough time to judge Rinomhota but 4 starts is enough for you to call McNulty useless. OK then, that makes sense
"one of" is pretty vagueJohn Smith wrote:Danny Williams is one of the best players to have ever played for Reading; incredible industry, desire, aggression and determination. Anyone looking for faults clearly has ideas above our station.
The only thing stopping him coming here would be wages - he can go and grab a pick up an easy bumper contract in China or Turkey instead.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], RoyalsMRR and 3 guests