Let’s be realistic here, Baldock offers absolutely fcuk all, he’s a complete waste of space.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:As I've never heard of him, I just did the usual checking him out on YouTube.
His Wolves goals mostly appear to fall into the 'picking up scraps category, i.e. others do all the work and he bundles the ball in after a save or a ricochet.
I'm not saying that's a bad trait to have, but he's no Nelson O.... and doesn't Baldock offer the above?
I love it when journos do this.Pepe the Horseman wrote:"As EXCLUSIVELY revealed by ME"Hound wrote:yep, and doesn't he like reminding everyone of itStranded wrote:
He has done a lot, lot, better than that over the past couple of weeks.
significantly taller than Sam B - similar height to NOCountryRoyal wrote:Let’s be realistic here, Baldock offers absolutely fcuk all, he’s a complete waste of space.Linden Jones' Tash wrote:As I've never heard of him, I just did the usual checking him out on YouTube.
His Wolves goals mostly appear to fall into the 'picking up scraps category, i.e. others do all the work and he bundles the ball in after a save or a ricochet.
I'm not saying that's a bad trait to have, but he's no Nelson O.... and doesn't Baldock offer the above?
Would imagine Wolves will be happy to pay the majority (if not all) his wages. He has no future there, so might as well let him get a season playing at a level he is suited too and either persuade us to sign him next summer or entice a bid from someone else.Old Man Andrews wrote:I think that would be the case with Bonatini too. There are a lot of out of favour strikers in the Premier League/at top Championship sides worth going for though, Bonatini just being one of them. We might be better off waiting until near the end of the loan window when clubs are desperate to offload, could get a better deal out of it.Hound wrote:loan fees, or big wages.Old Man Andrews wrote:
On transfer fees.
rumours are that even with the loans we have had, their parent clubs are again paying the majority, if not all
It depends if anyone else is interested. If it's just us, I agree we can get a good deal.Stranded wrote:Would imagine Wolves will be happy to pay the majority (if not all) his wages. He has no future there, so might as well let him get a season playing at a level he is suited too and either persuade us to sign him next summer or entice a bid from someone else.Old Man Andrews wrote:I think that would be the case with Bonatini too. There are a lot of out of favour strikers in the Premier League/at top Championship sides worth going for though, Bonatini just being one of them. We might be better off waiting until near the end of the loan window when clubs are desperate to offload, could get a better deal out of it.Hound wrote:
loan fees, or big wages.
rumours are that even with the loans we have had, their parent clubs are again paying the majority, if not all
If he doesn't go on loan, he is unlikely to be in the Wolves 25 so will essentially be paying for him to train.
Baldock simply isn't suited to the way we want to play a striker, so it would be quite easy to pick up someone who might be considered lesser quality, but actually performs the role we want much better.Hound wrote:Seems like Howe said in an interview that we are looking for a striker
Would genuinely be interested in who people think we are going to pick up that would be ‘better than Sam Baldock’
We’ve no money to spend. We’re basically gambling on a 19 year old prem youth Teamer or someone who has failed in recent history like a Jordan Hugill (who is prob still too expensive)
Your post makes no sense at all.Stranded wrote:Would imagine Wolves will be happy to pay the majority (if not all) his wages. He has no future there, so might as well let him get a season playing at a level he is suited too and either persuade us to sign him next summer or entice a bid from someone else.Old Man Andrews wrote:I think that would be the case with Bonatini too. There are a lot of out of favour strikers in the Premier League/at top Championship sides worth going for though, Bonatini just being one of them. We might be better off waiting until near the end of the loan window when clubs are desperate to offload, could get a better deal out of it.Hound wrote:
loan fees, or big wages.
rumours are that even with the loans we have had, their parent clubs are again paying the majority, if not all
If he doesn't go on loan, he is unlikely to be in the Wolves 25 so will essentially be paying for him to train.
Given Bury are under a transfer embargo, no.blythspartan wrote:Apparently the player has filmed himself at Gigg Lane the home of Bury. That just doesn’t make sense.
Seems to be to do with a new pair of boots.blythspartan wrote:Apparently the player has filmed himself at Gigg Lane the home of Bury. That just doesn’t make sense.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 43 guests