I feel like I've been OMA'ed.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
^ agree with ALL this.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
TBF, a lot of them have done as well as we might expect. Rino has broken through (though stalled a bit), Richards, Olise. Loader has played loads but not really done too well. And the likes of Barrett, Howe have moved to L1 and Watson and Smith have had some success out on loan.Zammo wrote:^ agree with ALL this.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
The only thing that makes me ☹ is that we have had a crack team of youngsters over the last few years and they haven’t broken through for reasons that are never disclosed (or they are all not good enough). Shame.
file under - thats youth players for yaZammo wrote:^ agree with ALL this.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
The only thing that makes me ☹ is that we have had a crack team of youngsters over the last few years and they haven’t broken through for reasons that are never disclosed (or they are all not good enough). Shame.
Yeah I guess it's the - we'd quite like you to stay, but we're not desperate - type of move. Bit disappointed this is a move rather than a loan, as I don't think Watson is going to cut it at this level.Maneki Neko wrote:thought he looked half decent whenever ive seen him.maybe shortsighted with our current options, though i still think he is at least a season and a half away from getting any decent go/significant number of games, so i can see its probably a good move for him, and wouldnt expect us to stand in his way if he wanted to go.
hope we have another option lined up at some point, but its not a priority, especially if gunter is getting an extension
As of August he could very conceivably have been 1 injury or loss of form away from being a first team regular. And from a finances stand point bound to be a cheaper option than Gunter.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
Tom McIntyre has done quite well !Hound wrote:TBF, a lot of them have done as well as we might expect. Rino has broken through (though stalled a bit), Richards, Olise. Loader has played loads but not really done too well. And the likes of Barrett, Howe have moved to L1 and Watson and Smith have had some success out on loan.Zammo wrote:^ agree with ALL this.WoodleyRoyal wrote:
he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
The only thing that makes me ☹ is that we have had a crack team of youngsters over the last few years and they haven’t broken through for reasons that are never disclosed (or they are all not good enough). Shame.
Its a fairly decent return, the one thing missing is someone really coming through and smashing it - hopefully Olise is that player
Tom McIntyre has done quite well !Hound wrote:TBF, a lot of them have done as well as we might expect. Rino has broken through (though stalled a bit), Richards, Olise. Loader has played loads but not really done too well. And the likes of Barrett, Howe have moved to L1 and Watson and Smith have had some success out on loan.Zammo wrote:^ agree with ALL this.WoodleyRoyal wrote:
he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
The only thing that makes me ☹ is that we have had a crack team of youngsters over the last few years and they haven’t broken through for reasons that are never disclosed (or they are all not good enough). Shame.
Its a fairly decent return, the one thing missing is someone really coming through and smashing it - hopefully Olise is that player
Big step up from U23 football to top level Championship, let alone premiership. Look at Blackett. Once had huge potential. Drifted along. With maturity comes real application. Some players have it and some don't. At least having a good academy will benefit the club financially. That's the model both City and Chelsea have adopted.Zammo wrote: The only thing that makes me ☹ is that we have had a crack team of youngsters over the last few years and they haven’t broken through for reasons that are never disclosed (or they are all not good enough). Shame.
Admittedly I've only seen him twice but I tend to agree with youSnowflake Royal wrote:As of August he could very conceivably have been 1 injury or loss of form away from being a first team regular. And from a finances stand point bound to be a cheaper option than Gunter.WoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
I think this is a missed opportunity for us but a good move for him. Still think a loan would have suited us and him better though.
The absolute state of this postWoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird
Agree with you SCIAG. I have watched a lot of U23 games over the past couple of years and Howe was nearly always the stand out player and was very consistent. Far more so than Loader & Barrett who seem to have had more opportunities in the first team.SCIAG wrote:The absolute state of this postWoodleyRoyal wrote:he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?The Royal Forester wrote:For him, it is a good move which will help him in the future. For us, a bad move, I feel that in a few years (or less) we will view him as someone who we wished we had kept.How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird![]()
The highlight is finding a really convoluted way to suggest a player who has just turned 21 is nearly 22.
Would you like to hazard a guess what sort of age our young players tend to establish themselves in the first team?
We’re going to lose Yiadom for at least a month next season (and let’s face it, he hasn’t exactly demanded selection even when fit this season). We have a young full back here who already looks comfortable at this level. Should we use him as cover for Yiadom, keep Gunter in our “prison” on much more money, or gamble on a new player unfamiliar with the club?
It’s a fairly trivial decision, Teddy Howe probably isn’t going to play for England, but it’s still an utterly bizarre decision and no amount of innuendo will change that.
Mmmm, i’ve also watched a lot of U23 and U18 games and frankly Howe was never a standout player. It was only really last season (IMHO) that he really kicked on and went from being very much a squad player to someone who looked a bit closer to stepping up. In terms of being standout he was never even the standout defender - Tom Mc and Osho have been ahead of him in that respect although Osho plateaued.Spud Gun wrote:Agree with you SCIAG. I have watched a lot of U23 games over the past couple of years and Howe was nearly always the stand out player and was very consistent. Far more so than Loader & Barrett who seem to have had more opportunities in the first team.SCIAG wrote:The absolute state of this postWoodleyRoyal wrote:
he's 21 will nearly be 22 by the start of next season and still nowhere near displacing first-team players. he's played what? 1 game?How long are we supposed to keep youngsters for, for goodness sake? it's an Acadamy not a prison. Would he be displacing Yiadom in two years time? doubtful, in fact I would even hang my hat on it and say no. It's quite strange this weird obsession our fans have with our academy products that we never want them to leave.
This isn't a mistake we will not live to regret this. It's a good move for both him and the club and anyone else who thinks differently is just a bit weird![]()
The highlight is finding a really convoluted way to suggest a player who has just turned 21 is nearly 22.
Would you like to hazard a guess what sort of age our young players tend to establish themselves in the first team?
We’re going to lose Yiadom for at least a month next season (and let’s face it, he hasn’t exactly demanded selection even when fit this season). We have a young full back here who already looks comfortable at this level. Should we use him as cover for Yiadom, keep Gunter in our “prison” on much more money, or gamble on a new player unfamiliar with the club?
It’s a fairly trivial decision, Teddy Howe probably isn’t going to play for England, but it’s still an utterly bizarre decision and no amount of innuendo will change that.
Howe has the potential to be a very good full back at this level and was just starting to show what he could do in the first team. I thought he played well against Blackpool and was going to kick on from there. It seems a very strange decision to sell a young player with potential when Gunter’s contract is running down.
CoughStaceycoughNewCorkSeth wrote:If I have learned one thing from HNA? it is that everytime the majority of people think it is a mistake to let a young player leave they never make it and the players that people think the club made the correct decision to let go are the ones who make it.
Users browsing this forum: Polonia, South Coast Royal, southcote89 and 207 guests