it’s gone on for years (Ipswich ‘87 anyone?)Winston Biscuit wrote:I think the media have tried to make a bigger deal of it than happened tbh.
The Forest incident was an absolute disgrace, and the media have taken that and run with it.
Maybe I have genuinely missed one of two of them, but apart from the Billy Sharpe one I am struggling to see anything newsworthy from fans running on the pitchAthleticoSpizz wrote:it’s gone on for years (Ipswich ‘87 anyone?)Winston Biscuit wrote:I think the media have tried to make a bigger deal of it than happened tbh.
The Forest incident was an absolute disgrace, and the media have taken that and run with it.
However, three events within the last week is actually newsworthy.
Is there a badge of honour to be gained for the mongskulls?
This one?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Swindon Player(s) being physically assaulted at Port Vale, Villa goalkeeper being assaulted at Citeh….catch -up
Heaven forbid somebody disagrees with you eh, genome?genome wrote:Just Green doing his whole contrarian thing
Seen a lot of speculation linking the rise in aggression and loutish behaviour to the rise of cocaine use at matches.genome wrote:I don't get it. Pitch invasions have been fine for years. Why are fans suddenly assaulting players?
Post-pandemic bellendry?
+1Green wrote:Heaven forbid somebody disagrees with you eh, genome?genome wrote:Just Green doing his whole contrarian thing
Although you must get that a lot.
+1Dirk Gently wrote:Seen a lot of speculation linking the rise in aggression and loutish behaviour to the rise of cocaine use at matches.genome wrote:I don't get it. Pitch invasions have been fine for years. Why are fans suddenly assaulting players?
Post-pandemic bellendry?
Not sure how true it actually is, but i do think there's something in it - so maybe the old-skool hoolies have been priced out, but some of the affluent casuals who've replaced them might be coked up to the eyeballs
I can think of some players whom carrying a water cannon around for 90 minutes wouldn't make them any less mobile...Loafer wrote:Options for me are (in order):
It is - that's the law now, it renders you liable to a 3-year FBO. But there's strength in numbers - how do you do that to 2,00 who come on the pitch simultaneously.Loafer wrote:Ban fans from games. Not just people who attack but everybody who steps foot on a pitch. Shouldn't be hard to get seat numbers. Stepping foot on a pitch should be an offence.
So punish the 10,000 who stayed in their seats for the behaviour of a much smaller number? And how many need to come on the pitch to trigger it? That's simply a terrible policy.Loafer wrote:Ban fans and go behind closed doors.
See above point. And what if the invasion comes from the away end? Leads to a potential scenario of Peterborough sending a couple of hundred to the MadStad and invading the pitch a few games ago - that might have kept them up.Loafer wrote:Points removed.
Why not go the whole hog and have fences up to keep supporters in place?Loafer wrote:Netting up, and section off seats so they cannot get down.
Loafer wrote:Water cannons or weapons given to players.
If you're just here for petty squabbles try AE.NathStPaul wrote:Green having a mare.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests