It's a point though. Many fans were moaning last season when we were linked with players with underwhelming/poor stats. It's almost as if if it fits the narrative of what the fans want, rather than what is actually needed, then it passes.BraisingsteakRoyal wrote:His stats are sh1t. Apparently Derby and Huddersfield were also interested in him.
Hope he's better than his stats suggest he is.
EDIT: cos they're sh1t.
Stats are for geeks and paedophiles.BraisingsteakRoyal wrote:His stats are sh1t. Apparently Derby and Huddersfield were also interested in him.
Hope he's better than his stats suggest he is.
EDIT: cos they're sh1t.
Stats are dependant on what the player has been asked to do: if you've been told not to press - you're pressing stats are going to be lower than someone who's been asked to press, etc. Also Knibbs was playing for a rather poor Cambridge side last season, so that will have a bearing on his stats.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:It's a point though. Many fans were moaning last season when we were linked with players with underwhelming/poor stats. It's almost as if if it fits the narrative of what the fans want, rather than what is actually needed, then it passes.BraisingsteakRoyal wrote:His stats are sh1t. Apparently Derby and Huddersfield were also interested in him.
Hope he's better than his stats suggest he is.
EDIT: cos they're sh1t.
Not being negative, I'm always of the idea that it's not about what someone has done before but what they can do for you and if the recruitment team think that Knibbs can thrive and improve in our team then I'm happy enough with that. But there is a view that some fans seem happy with this because it fits the narrative of young player, when his stats at this level aren't too dissimilar to others we've been linked with that were more experienced, but never really stood out.
you dont need to put a 1 in shit btw its not filtered on hereBraisingsteakRoyal wrote:His stats are sh1t. Apparently Derby and Huddersfield were also interested in him.
Hope he's better than his stats suggest he is.
EDIT: cos they're sh1t.
Agree and that's sort of my point as to why I don't always take previous stats into account, because if we are looking at players who are potentially more suited to our system and their best qualities can be brought out with us then obviously you'd anticipate an improvement.Clyde1998 wrote:Stats are dependant on what the player has been asked to do: if you've been told not to press - you're pressing stats are going to be lower than someone who's been asked to press, etc. Also Knibbs was playing for a rather poor Cambridge side last season, so that will have a bearing on his stats.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:It's a point though. Many fans were moaning last season when we were linked with players with underwhelming/poor stats. It's almost as if if it fits the narrative of what the fans want, rather than what is actually needed, then it passes.BraisingsteakRoyal wrote:His stats are sh1t. Apparently Derby and Huddersfield were also interested in him.
Hope he's better than his stats suggest he is.
EDIT: cos they're sh1t.
Not being negative, I'm always of the idea that it's not about what someone has done before but what they can do for you and if the recruitment team think that Knibbs can thrive and improve in our team then I'm happy enough with that. But there is a view that some fans seem happy with this because it fits the narrative of young player, when his stats at this level aren't too dissimilar to others we've been linked with that were more experienced, but never really stood out.
We won't know how we intend to use him until he plays - will he be a lone striker, played in strike partnership, used as a wide forward or as an attacking midfielder? What stats are even relevant will depend on this.
Both almost had a 1in2 goal scoring record.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Last 2 strikers signed from Cambridge worked out ok, Butler & Kitson
You can probably take the waterproof sheet offwindermereROYAL wrote:Does this mean I can officially stop pissing the bed?
Better hope we aren't trying to use him as a striker given he's never scored more than 5 league goals in a season.Hound wrote:He is a midfielder rather than a striker I think. 5 goals and 5 assists is ok
But he is basically young, reasonably experienced, probably cheap enough. He’ll come and be a solid squad player who is prob sub or substituted more often than not
He is a solid enough signing, don’t think anyone is pretending he is much more than that
I think he was top scorer in his first L1 season (2021-22): it was four in the league, two in the FA Cup and three in the League Trophy. Scored five (all in the league) last season.Snowflake Royal wrote:Better hope we aren't trying to use him as a striker given he's never scored more than 5 league goals in a season.Hound wrote:He is a midfielder rather than a striker I think. 5 goals and 5 assists is ok
But he is basically young, reasonably experienced, probably cheap enough. He’ll come and be a solid squad player who is prob sub or substituted more often than not
He is a solid enough signing, don’t think anyone is pretending he is much more than that
OS says he was top scorer for Cambridge in L2 with 9 goals. Must have done well in the cup because whoscored has 2 for L2 that year.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests