Sums it up well.Garry Baldy wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 19:42 For me, definitely out.
I can take winning a few, losing a few but our football is dire and it's not because our players are not good enough. It's because of the manager. Apparently our owner is disappointed with our attendances. Surely he must realise our brand of sterile unattractive football has something to do with it.
Indeed it does.scumbag wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 21:20Sums it up well.Garry Baldy wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 19:42 For me, definitely out.
I can take winning a few, losing a few but our football is dire and it's not because our players are not good enough. It's because of the manager. Apparently our owner is disappointed with our attendances. Surely he must realise our brand of sterile unattractive football has something to do with it.
I really don’t know. Just somebody who encourages and coaches players to pass the ball forward constructively, to control the ball confidently, to know where your team mates need to receive the ball, to move into space where you know you can be available to receive the ball and how to beat a man, rather than just go backwards / sideways or hoof it aimlessly forward every time an opposition player is within 5 yards of you.AthleticoSpizz wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 22:01 Agree that it’s turgid, agree that it will have an effect
Who should manage Reading Rothers?
Pards, Coppell and McDermott were all bootroom appointments. There is a common football strategic ethos they all followed.WestYorksRoyal wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 22:44 This "who would replace" question is bothering me a bit. Pardew and McDermott had no managerial experience and did a great job for us. Coppell obviously had some big previous success, but it was >10 years before he managed us which no doubt many would have written off as belonging to a different era. Lincoln was Skubala's first managerial job apart from a few interim games for Leeds.
We're not trying to find a candidate to manage Real Madrid or England.
I was one of the minority who voted "in" earlier for reasons already articulated, but this "who would replace him?" is a non-argument for me.
What our successful managers all had in common is they were right for the team and the club. We had a clear cultural identity in those days and clear roles and responsibilities. We don't currently have that which is a bigger problem than Leam. So let's say the owners have a big reset and try to think about what the identity of the club is, how a manager fits in with that and ultimately conclude Richardson is not the right choice. In that case, get rid of him, as replacement options will be available.
If only there was already a (premature and pointless) thread on this already.WestYorksRoyal wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026 17:12I mean, the whole purpose of this place is to allow people to debate their opinions on Reading FC which is what he's asking us to do.![]()
Are you suggesting he shouldn't start the debate because you don't agree with him?
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Mr Angry and 36 guests