The tannoy

Stranded · by **Stranded** » 13 Aug 2006 11:52

Billy The Fish wrote:Maybe they felt if the crowd couldn't be bothered to turn up then they couldn't be bothered with the tannoy. Anyone know what the attendance was? Oh, it's on the OS. 9,267. Poor show.

Looks like the bribe didn't work then.

Tony Le Mesmer · by **Tony Le Mesmer** » 13 Aug 2006 12:13

Stranded wrote:
Billy The Fish wrote:Maybe they felt if the crowd couldn't be bothered to turn up then they couldn't be bothered with the tannoy. Anyone know what the attendance was? Oh, it's on the OS. 9,267. Poor show.
Looks like the bribe didn't work then.

Poor show indeed. I was expecting a lot more people not to fall for the bribe than that.

Royalshow · by **Royalshow** » 13 Aug 2006 20:22

Row Z Royal wrote:Surprisingly, the PA is working even less well than it was at the back end of last season. They need to turn it up a big so that we can here what's being said over the noise of our fans ( )

Don't be daft

The Cube · by **The Cube** » 13 Aug 2006 20:53

I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.

The_Cat · by **The_Cat** » 13 Aug 2006 21:29

The Cube wrote:I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.

It's sunday.

earley_royals · by **earley_royals** » 13 Aug 2006 23:47

The_Cat wrote:
The Cube wrote:I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
It's sunday.

And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.

Problem?

The_Cat · by **The_Cat** » 13 Aug 2006 23:59

earley_royals wrote:
The_Cat wrote:
The Cube wrote:I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
It's sunday.
And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.

Problem?

I was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".

earley_royals · by **earley_royals** » 14 Aug 2006 00:06

The_Cat wrote:
earley_royals wrote:
The_Cat wrote:It's sunday.
And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.

Problem?
I was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".

I'd imagine he was being sarcastic.

ellpryjon · by **ellpryjon** » 14 Aug 2006 09:46

Tony Le Mesmer wrote:IT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME.

pa system i believe

The_Cat · by **The_Cat** » 14 Aug 2006 11:27

earley_royals wrote:
The_Cat wrote:
earley_royals wrote: And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.

Problem?
I was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".
I'd imagine he was being sarcastic.

Or not.

biscuitman · by **biscuitman** » 14 Aug 2006 12:35

IT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME

Who the hell calls it the speaker system???!

purleyroyal · by **purleyroyal** » 14 Aug 2006 12:46

It's probably stuck together with sellotape

Tony Le Mesmer · by **Tony Le Mesmer** » 14 Aug 2006 13:15

biscuitman wrote:
IT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME
Who the hell calls it the speaker system???!

A HA!

The Cube · by **The Cube** » 14 Aug 2006 13:25

The_Cat wrote:
The Cube wrote:I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
It's sunday. :roll:

Can someone point me in the direction of a board where there are no children?

Links

Forums

The tannoy

Who is online