Why?West Stand Man wrote:Where is the option for 'nowhere'?
"if the club were to agree to introducing terraced areas where would be the preferred location? "West Stand Man wrote:Where is the option for 'nowhere'?
Maybe West Stand Man thinks that fans shouldn't have the choice to stand or sit?Platypuss wrote:"if the club were to agree to introducing terraced areas where would be the preferred location? "West Stand Man wrote:Where is the option for 'nowhere'?
HTH.
Labour said exactly the same thing pre-1997, nothing happened.Mr Irascible wrote:There is a momentum behind the campaigns to get terraces returned to football with David Cameron now including it as prospective future Conservative government policy. Leaving aside any political comment please...if the club were to agree to introducing terraced areas where would be the preferred location? I am assuming on the grounds of safety that the West Upper is excluded along with any proposed stadium extensions.
GeniusDirk Gently wrote:![]()
majority rules perhaps?Harps stay sharp wrote:If the majority are voting for the South East corner to be the area set aside for Standing, why should me and my two sons have to relocate to another part of the ground? We quite like it where we are thanks!
Nobody's saying you would have to move.Harps stay sharp wrote:If the majority are voting for the South East corner to be the area set aside for Standing, why should me and my two sons have to relocate to another part of the ground? We quite like it where we are thanks!
After seeing that, I really can't see why club's can't do this in England.URZZZZZZZZ wrote:GeniusDirk Gently wrote:![]()
Totally not grasping the concept. Well done for triyng though....Harps stay sharp wrote:If majority rules.
Do a poll (I am pretty sure it's been done before) Standing Vs Sitting. As I recall the majority prefer to sit.
End of discussion.
You taking the piss?Schards#2 wrote: Can STAR organise a campaign?
Well the majority can sit in thier seats, and the rest of us can be provided with a safe standing area.Harps stay sharp wrote:If majority rules.
Do a poll (I am pretty sure it's been done before) Standing Vs Sitting. As I recall the majority prefer to sit.
End of discussion.
No, I think you will find that he is fully grasping the conceptroland* wrote:Totally not grasping the concept. Well done for triyng though....Harps stay sharp wrote:If majority rules.
Do a poll (I am pretty sure it's been done before) Standing Vs Sitting. As I recall the majority prefer to sit.
End of discussion.
Surely there's room for both - and that is what this is all about - choice.Harps stay sharp wrote:If majority rules.
Do a poll (I am pretty sure it's been done before) Standing Vs Sitting. As I recall the majority prefer to sit.
End of discussion.
I think having 38,000 seats we can't sell out each week will help.dean horrix legend wrote:What happens if more people want to stand then places available? Those who can't stand in the designated area then stand anyway as happens now,thus running the risk of getting banned.
I am sure Mr Mad is already planning the changes. The momentum of 69 votes will hae swayed him.There is a momentum behind the campaigns
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], RG30 and 70 guests