Yeah Arsenal gave us 3,000 i think. However Arsenal has a bigger stadium than their N. London rivals.SpaceCruiser wrote:Only 2,801 tickets?!?!? That's less than Arsenal, isn't it?
Yeah Arsenal gave us 3,000 i think. However Arsenal has a bigger stadium than their N. London rivals.SpaceCruiser wrote:Only 2,801 tickets?!?!? That's less than Arsenal, isn't it?
15 quid, happy days.RG30 wrote:On a slighty seperate issue, while doing a bit of fishing on the net last night, I discovered that for Charlton away, ticket prices should be as;
£20
£15 Over 60's and Under 21's
£10 Under 16's
http://www.cafc.co.uk/newsview.ink?nid=30474
Fairplay to Charlton, £15 for me for a Premiership game is an absolute bargin. Bolton also offer a Student rate which helps me but no news as to what price band fixture the game will be classified as.
I never had you down as being over 60?RG30 wrote:£20
£15 Over 60's and Under 21's
£10 Under 16's
Fairplay to Charlton, £15 for me for a Premiership game is an absolute bargin.
How is this allowed. They should have to change the way they segregate the away fans from the home fans to give the "3000 or 10% which ever is the lowest"!AJ~ wrote:2801 is the standard "maximum" away Premiership allocation at The Lane with the way it's segregated.
It does make life so much easier and less tense...never any danger of missing out and tickets dropping gently onto your doormat...1871 Royal wrote:Day one for me = Away season ticket holder
I've been and understand what you are saying. Argument is; why is it our allocation that should suffer?Huntley & Palmer wrote:Have you ever been to White Hart Lane? The segregation is stewards either side of the away support in the top tier and a line to the right of the away fans in the lower tier. There is no official barriers or netting between the fans. Just like at Newcastle and hence why just under 200 seats are lost
Because there is not set segregation at White Hart Lane, apart from a visitors entrance. It's under 200 seats, I can't see why RFC fans get so steamed over such trivial matters. The home club always wants as many of it's own fans in as possible, they have probably justified the small reduction in tickets on safety grounds.roland* wrote:I've been and understand what you are saying. Argument is; why is it our allocation that should suffer?Huntley & Palmer wrote:Have you ever been to White Hart Lane? The segregation is stewards either side of the away support in the top tier and a line to the right of the away fans in the lower tier. There is no official barriers or netting between the fans. Just like at Newcastle and hence why just under 200 seats are lost
Alongside your credit card statement. Which plummets like a stone onto your doormat.3 veesinarow wrote:It does make life so much easier and less tense...never any danger of missing out and tickets dropping gently onto your doormat...1871 Royal wrote:Day one for me = Away season ticket holder
Unless the bailiffs have taken it.Im Spartacus wrote:Alongside your credit card statement. Which plummets like a stone onto your doormat.3 veesinarow wrote:It does make life so much easier and less tense...never any danger of missing out and tickets dropping gently onto your doormat...1871 Royal wrote:Day one for me = Away season ticket holder
I'd be grateful if you could explain as to who has now been disadvantaged by the way the Spurs ticket sales have been handled.Spirit of Elm Park wrote:So the club buckle to the will of those not willing to put themselves out in the previous system?, ticket office give themselves an easy life IMO
To those that did complain and think you have aminor victory, you still have to get to the ticket office or through on the phones on a particular day, and there is still no guarantee of a ticket if you miss that day.
Be interesting to see what happens with this one.....but then its spurs....on Sky.......So obviously massive demand?
bolted door the horse the after has closed (rearrange at will)
IMO
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 104 guests